The ones that use English and not infantile taunts that grown ups have to look up in an Urban slang dictionary?
Good post.OK, not hatred, but:
For me Corbyn is an old idealistic fool.
I do like the idea of nationalising Water & Energy industry infrastructure but operated by private, none profit companies. Don't want to go back to state employees in large numbers able to hold country to ransom with wages, terms & conditions etc.
- A history of supporting undesirables, IRA, Hezbollha & even Russia
- Anti-Israel (no idea if anti-Jew but doubt it, he's not racist IMO)
- Can't seem to make a decision
- No charisma, poor public image
- Wants to unilaterally get rid of our nuclear deterrent (this alone is a no-no for me)
- Wants strong Unions to hold country to ransom again as per 70's
- Doesn't understand that if you tax wealthy too much they will just leave & take their business & job creation activities with them. Needs to be done world over and no chance.
When Ed Miliband stabbed his brother Dave Miliband in the back by getting unions & members to back him (not elected MP's) he then changed labour voting system in their favour to give more power to Unions/Membership and away from the elected MP's.
When MP's wanted to get rid of Corbyn they couldn't because the militant Momentum membership & Unions now had more power to block what the elected MP's wanted which is why he is still here even though he as nearly the lowest rating of any potential leader.
From the electorate (my) perspective it is the MP's that should have the main power over selecting the Labour leadership. They are the ones we can vote in & out. Any idiot with extreme views can pay their few quid to join the Labour Party diluting the sensible membership and the Union leaders that hold large sway are normally just the biggest gobsh*te that has worked his way through the union representing a membership that just pays their weekly/monthly fee with little interest who heads it (from my experience in industry in Big Lens union).
So, Labour has some serious issues that even getting rid of team Corbyn might not solve while Momentum has their claws into the running of it. (was Militant in 70's & 80's)
I've voted Labour more than any party in my life but I couldn't vote for them now. When my 80 yo mother who must have been born with a red stripe through her spine and has blindly voted labour all her life isn't voting Labour that says it all really. I live in Miners & steelworkers backyard in South Yorkshire and have never heard as many Labour supporters looking at alternatives to voting Labour.
They should get money and lobbying out of politics, with recognised/approved parties funded by taxation. We could then have a Labour type party not controlled by Unions & a Conservative type party not controlled by big money/corporations.
Ah I shall start posting idiot memes about right wing politicians and slag them off and get my political news from Jonathan pie and then I will be a grown upThe ones that use English and not infantile taunts that grown ups have to look up in an Urban slang dictionary?
0.06% of the membership has been reported as being anti-Semitic I'm not condoning it far from it.Primark Lenin is a joke and, as a labour member, I'd never consider voting Labour again. Unless Tumnus buggers off back to Narnia.
The whole anti-Semitism is racisim-lite is disgusting.
Perspective is how the Labour leadership has dealt with those reported and those that have reported them. Just saying.0.06% of the membership has been reported as being anti-Semitic I'm not condoning it far from it.
But a bit of perspective is needed with the whole anti semitism affair.
^^^^Is little "high tax" more agreeable than moderate "low tax"... Hong Kong thrives on an even lower tax economy than the UK as far I understand it...as everyone pays it - there is less impetus to avoid paying it... this in theory should equal a more stable tax revenue.
For myself they are now little more than a protest uni movement more than the opposition party they should be .^^^^
This. Is what we should be moving our tax system towards.
I really don't think any left winger (certainly not Corby or McD) gets the above at all though.
Most are too full of hatred and jealousy of the rich.
Wow. I thought it was rife. You'd think so according to the press. But if only 0.06% have been reported...0.06% of the membership has been reported as being anti-Semitic I'm not condoning it far from it.
But a bit of perspective is needed with the whole anti semitism affair.
More have been reported iirc.Wow. I thought it was rife. You'd think so according to the press. But if only 0.06% have been reported...
There is absolutely no issue with critiquing Israel. Not when it’s done in a non anti Semitic manner. Please don’t that conflating and deflecting. Interestingly doing that can make it anti Semitic againMore have been reported iirc.
People have an issue rightly or wrongly with the criticism of the state of Israel.
Some believe that to be antisemetic others believe that criticism of Israel for the way it handles it's foreign policy is justified.
I long to live in a world where when I watch or read the news, it's not all people dying here there and everywhere.
Crisis all over the world especially in the middle east.
Is it to much to ask for people just to get along with each other.
The 'internationally accepted definition' you refer to is part of a misinformation narrative. Basically it is not internationally accepted...There is absolutely no issue with critiquing Israel. Not when it’s done in a non anti Semitic manner. Please don’t that conflating and deflecting. Interestingly doing that can make it anti Semitic again
If you can’t see that the problem is with the leadership and their inaction and just talk down the issue, than you are exactly part of the problem.
for example, why did Labour find it necessary to play silly little games like not adhering to the internationally accepted definition of what anti semitische is? It’s the entirety of their behaviour that was and continues to be appalling.
This is an example of Momentum labour. Kevin has represented my ward for a couple decades now and seat has always had a local MP to represent but now parachute Corbynistas into place.Like others, I wouldn't say I hate Corbyn. I'm sure he is a nice guy.
I just don't want him as the leader of the Labour party.
He has taken the Labour party from a close main opposition party to one that could even drop down to become only the third biggest party.
He has done absolutely nothing to combat antisemitism that is rife in the party.
The Labour policies on so many issues are complete nonsense.
Momentum are a terrible group and need dumping.
He is unable to make a decision on Brexit which will cost Labour a lot of votes.
One good thing is that when Labour lose heavily in the December election, Corbyn will have no choice but to go. Whether he wants to or not.
By the way, I was a life long Labour voter, so this isn't the words of a Tory just bashing Corbyn again.
Yet they have now accepted it. The fact that they made an issue where there should be no issue is one of the signed. It really doesn’t have to be so hard.The 'internationally accepted definition' you refer to is part of a misinformation narrative. Basically it is not internationally accepted...
In mid-July, an unprecedented joint statement signed by more than 40 Jewish organisations around the world (including seven in the UK) was published critiquing the IHRA definition.
What has happened though is that the media has distorted and misreported Labour especially in relation to the 'universally' and 'global' adoption of the IHRA defintion. The MRC found 27 examples of misleading and 28 examples of inaccurate reporting made in regard to the IHRA definition.
- although the IHRA is an international body with representatives from 31 countries, only six of those countries have, to date, formally adopted the definition themselves
- In spite of a call for local authorities to adopt the definition by the UK’s central government in early 2017, less than a third of councils have responded and several of those have chosen not to include any of the controversial examples contained within the working definition
- Several high-profile bodies have rejected or distanced themselves from the working definition, including the EU’s Fundamental Rights Agency (a successor to the body that drafted the original wording on which the definition is based) and academic institutions including the London School of Economics and the School of Oriental and African Studies.
- Mainstream academic and legal opinion has been overwhelmingly critical of the IHRA definition, including formal opinions produced by three senior UK barristersand one former appeals court judge
The Media Reform Coalition has conducted in-depth research on the controversy surrounding antisemitism in the Labour Party, focusing on media coverage of the crisis during the summer of 2018. Following extensive case study research, we identified myriad inaccuracies and distortions in online and television news including marked skews in sourcing, omission of essential context or right of reply, misquotation, and false assertions made either by journalists themselves or sources whose contentious claims were neither challenged nor countered. Overall, our findings were consistent with a disinformation paradigm.
....we can say with some certainty that there have been prevalent errors, omissions and skews in the mainstream coverage. This was no anomaly: almost all of the problems observed in both the framing and sourcing of stories were in favour of a particular recurrent narrative: that the Labour Party has been or is being lost to extremists, racists and the ‘hard left’.
New MRC research finds inaccuracies and distortions in media coverage of antisemitism and the Labour Party - Media Reform Coalition
It's a difficult one.One good thing is that when Labour lose heavily in the December election, Corbyn will have no choice but to go. Whether he wants to or not.
Labour adopted the IHRA definition in 2016. It was the four examples given along with IHRA which it ammended/changed. It has now adopted the full examples list.Yet they have now accepted it. The fact that they made an issue where there should be no issue is one of the signed. It really doesn’t have to be so hard.
It became an issue because the media wanted it to become an issue. The media didn't report the IHRA definitions situation with the Conservative Party in the same way and also downplayed the Conservative Party's Islamophobia Islamophobia in the UK Conservative Party (1997–present) - WikipediaFurthermore If they dealt swiftly and decisive with the issues raised in the party that part wouldn’t have become such an issue.
Labour won't rebuild into anything electable unless Lansman/Momentum get their claws out of the Labour Executive.Labour rebuilds, then manages to win another election before the trade agreement is signed off, allowing us to sign up to a labour inspired free trade agreement with Freedom of Movement
As I said, If they acted decisively and with immediacy on the issues in the Labour Party it would not have had to be a problem. But they didn’t and they don’t.Labour adopted the IHRA definition in 2016. It was the four examples given along with IHRA which it ammended/changed. It has now adopted the full examples list.
However the Conservatives at the same period of time had not even adopted the IHRA definition.
Labour’s rulebook makes three references to antisemitism, whereas the Conservative code of conduct from December 2017 does not use the word once. But as it stands, we’ve yet to see any documents that make explicit reference to antisemitism or the IHRA definition of antisemitism. The Conservative party code of conduct does not expressly mention antisemitism once – let alone define it.
FactCheck: Conservative party rulebook doesn’t mention antisemitism
In July, we reported that the Conservative rulebook didn’t use the term antisemitism, despite Theresa May’s assertion that the party had adopted the IHRA definition. Just hours after we published our article, the Conservative party webpage seemed to have been quietly updated to include a mention of the IHRA that wasn’t there before.
FactCheck: Labour rulebook doesn’t mention IHRA antisemitism definition or examples
It became an issue because the media wanted it to become an issue. The media didn't report the IHRA definitions situation with the Conservative Party in the same way and also downplayed the Conservative Party's Islamophobia Islamophobia in the UK Conservative Party (1997–present) - Wikipedia
No comment on your post but I love your username - brings back many happy memories of watching the great man from the North Bank.Hate is too strong a word..but while at the helm he has made Labour un- electable... his Nationalise this that and everything is a throw back to a policy that were rejected in the 70's by the Electorate .. which lead to decades of Tory rule. I could go on forever on what is wrong about a Labour party lead by Corbyn..
But the single biggest fact for my dislike of him .. from 1979-2017 i had voted Labour at a General Election .. but in 2017 i voted Liberal to my shame.. and with him and his like still there, will more than likely do so again.. thinking about it maybe hate is indeed not too strong. .