ozzzy189
Distinguished Member
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2006
- Messages
- 12,384
- Reaction score
- 4,239
- Points
- 2,244
- Age
- 53
- Location
- North Lincolnshire
Can't live with that!the colour shift is due to having a va panel all va panels do it
Can't live with that!the colour shift is due to having a va panel all va panels do it
Can't live with that!
Screen burn is not a worry with modern oled.thats ultimately you’re choice but I would live with colour shift then screen burn as least one is not permanent damage To a tv
Screen burn is not a worry with modern oled.
Possibly because some people are using inappropriate settings, don't vary content and aren't being sensible.threads all over the forums disagree
and if it wasn’t a problem any more why do John Lewis sell a warranty for screen burn
Possibly because some people are using inappropriate settings, don't vary content and aren't being sensible.
Rtings and HDTV test have both done tests that equate to 20 years use without any issue. You believe what you want but none of my friends or indeed me myself have had any issues.
I might keep this, I might not.
We shall see.
I don't understand what you are trying to say. I have an oled, I've gamed on it pretty heavily, I bought an lcd for my ps5 and I foolishly expected it to be relatively on a par. Its not. Its not even close. If I can get the thing looking better after Andy has had a look at it I'll keep it because the bx isn't perfect with vrr etc anyway. All the videos from ratings and HDTV recommend the guidelines I mentioned if you want to play games in an oled, I only repeated what they said. The fact that you seem to have a beef with people like me who don't have any issues gaming on oled insinuate that you've spent a lot of money on a vastly inferior technology.why is it when a oled user/owner is confronted with screenburn It’s always “inappropriate settings” or misuse of the unit
and as for keeping the Sony we all know What’s going to happen there as well “Can't live with that!”
I don't understand what you are trying to say. I have an oled, I've gamed on it pretty heavily, I bought an lcd for my ps5 and I foolishly expected it to be relatively on a par. Its not. Its not even close. If I can get the thing looking better after Andy has had a look at it I'll keep it because the bx isn't perfect with vrr etc anyway. All the videos from ratings and HDTV recommend the guidelines I mentioned if you want to play games in an oled, I only repeated what they said. The fact that you seem to have a beef with people like me who don't have any issues gaming on oled insinuate that you've spent a lot of money on a vastly inferior technology.
If you abuse it you might have issues, there are people who have had issues, I'm not one and I don't know any.
I bought a mid range TV for the ps5 and a TV for gaming that costs over a grand is a bit OTT imo but I'd spend in that region if one ticked a lot of the boxes.
Lcd has its pros, well maybe 2 at most but the tech is still vastly flawed as display technology. It always will be. The fact that I prefer the flaws of oled really shouldn't upset you so much.
If I hadn't come from an oled it might not be such a big deal, but I have, so it is.
Please refrain form engaging your nonsense with me, it's boring and isn't helping anyone else choose a ps5 display.
@ozzzy189 I would return the XH9005 mate. I would either get the XH9505 and be happy with 4K 60fps with really good HDR or, wait until the XH9505 successor next year which will very likely included HDMI 2.1 but still have very good HDR handling. Whether or not the gamma issues that are affecting all VRR displays atm will be fixed is another matter...
Which is exactly why I have been advising people to go for the XH9505 over the XH9005 however, some people just can't see past the HDMI 2.1 vs HDM0 2.0. These people probably, unfortunately for them, don't understand what HDR is either.what I’ve seen they can’t be fixed its a hardware issue according to a hdtvtest video I’ve seen
Definitely should have given the XH9505 a go. Ah well.Obviously the camera doesn't do the lcd any favours, and it washes out the colours on the oled, so much for Huawei p30 Pro being a good camera, but you can plainly see one looks good, and one really doesn't.
It's personal choice at the end of the day but if you want blue blacks, colour shift, blurred movement and NO risk of screen burn then go ahead, knock yourself out buy one of these over rated pieces of rubbish.
If you want stunning blacks and fantastic contrast with solid looking colours that don't shift when you turn your head, smooth motion and a miniscule risk of screen burn but only if you're a total doob, then buy an oled.
Replacement proper TV coming Saturday.
Sorry, I gave it a chance and it wasn't bad for clouding or dse but I'm taking my chance with tint and uniformity and going for a bx, even knowing about the vrr bug.
Definitely should have given the XH9505 a go. Ah well.
Did you even try the XH9005 with the PS5 with HDR OFF?
No, no point I like HDR as long as its not too much.Definitely should have given the XH9505 a go. Ah well.
Did you even try the XH9005 with the PS5 with HDR OFF?
Whatever, I tried to give it a chance.
yeah i cant see the point in turning HDR offNo, no point I like HDR as long as its not too much.
@ozzzy189 I would return the XH9005 mate. I would either get the XH9505 and be happy with 4K 60fps with really good HDR or, wait until the XH9505 successor next year which will very likely included HDMI 2.1 but still have very good HDR handling. Whether or not the gamma issues that are affecting all VRR displays atm will be fixed is another matter...
Whatever, I tried to give it a chance.
The video 'CX vs x90h (xh90) it shouldn't be this close' don't believe it, it really isn't.
If you have to spend a lot of money to get a reasonable lcd then why bother? They're just not worth it.
What's fundamentally different between the XH9005 and 9505 that would fix the bluey blacks / colour shift issue he's seeing? They're both fald leds at the the of the day. I'm very surprised the 9005 blacks look like bad given it's a fald, ok granted it doesn't have loads of dimming zones but I've been very impressed with previous fald led TVs I've had in terms of the blacks at least. The pics of the 9005 posted don't look good at all but I'm struggling to work out why the 9505 would be a lot better as far as blacks are concerned really? I appreciate the 9505 is definitely more highly regarded as a TV and I probably wouldn't put having hdmi 2.1 above that myself personally as I don't see hdmi 2.1 as being that important but I'm interested in what sets the 9005 and 9505 apart when it comes to black level performance , does the 9505 have more zones?
The 55" XH9505 is only £100 more than the 55" XH9005 and is a much better TV for HDR and general viewing due to more dimming zones.Whatever, I tried to give it a chance.
The video 'CX vs x90h (xh90) it shouldn't be this close' don't believe it, it really isn't.
If you have to spend a lot of money to get a reasonable lcd then why bother? They're just not worth it.
But the XH9005 has very poor HDR. It's USP is that it has HDMI 2.1 to do 4K 120hz with vrr (lol, don't need that at a stable 4K - native or dynamic - 60fps).No, no point I like HDR as long as its not too much.