I'm not sure about that, it might be backwards compatible with HDMI 2.0 rather than 2.0a but 1.4 seems unlikely. The real question is can Dolby Vision deliver dynamic metadata without needing HDMI 2.1?Thanks Steve.
I have read that Dolby Vision was also designed to be delivered over HDMI 1.4, which is another reason why widespread adoption by the TV manufacturers would have been nice. Edit: By that I mean to be backwardly compatible with HDMI 1.4.
I'm not sure about that, it might be backwards compatible with HDMI 2.0 rather than 2.0a but 1.4 seems unlikely. The real question is can Dolby Vision deliver dynamic metadata without needing HDMI 2.1?
I'm not sure about that, it might be backwards compatible with HDMI 2.0 rather than 2.0a but 1.4 seems unlikely. The real question is can Dolby Vision deliver dynamic metadata without needing HDMI 2.1?
I asked a number of manufacturers at IFA about dynamic metadata but I got conflicting answers with some saying that it would require HDMI 2.1 and other saying they might be able to do it with 2.0a. I got the general impression that dynamic metadata wasn't a priority as far as the manufacturers were concerned and that HLG (Hybrid Log Gamma) and HFR (High Frame Rate) were more important now that the UHD broadcast standards are nearing completion. Is dynamic metadata really important at the moment? I also spoke to the BDA who said that dynamic metadata wasn't even included in the specifications for Ultra HD Blu-ray. So if dynamic metadata is introduced on HDR10 it might be primarily for streaming in which case HDMI 2.0a/2.1 would be less of an issue because the TV could decode it internally. If you're waiting to buy a TV, I think the more important aspect is going to higher frame rates because 100p makes a huge difference to watching sport.
I find the manufacturers' response somewhat alarming. There a lot of people ( myself included ) wanting to upgrade their displays. We need to be certain about future proofing our purchases if we are going to spend a considerable amount of money. I also want to upgrade my AVR and have the Denon AVR-X4300H in my sights. Do I need to review its spec' as well?I asked a number of manufacturers at IFA about dynamic metadata but I got conflicting answers with some saying that it would require HDMI 2.1 and other saying they might be able to do it with 2.0a. I got the general impression that dynamic metadata wasn't a priority as far as the manufacturers were concerned and that HLG (Hybrid Log Gamma) and HFR (High Frame Rate) were more important now that the UHD broadcast standards are nearing completion. Is dynamic metadata really important at the moment? I also spoke to the BDA who said that dynamic metadata wasn't even included in the specifications for Ultra HD Blu-ray. So if dynamic metadata is introduced on HDR10 it might be primarily for streaming in which case HDMI 2.0a/2.1 would be less of an issue because the TV could decode it internally. If you're waiting to buy a TV, I think the more important aspect is going to higher frame rates because 100p makes a huge difference to watching sport.
Is that an up to date comment? I've not heard anyone say that about 2016 OLEDsNot to mention the guys at Spectracal (Stacey Spears) pointed out that the LG OLED'S Not being True 4k 3840 across pertaining to WRGB/RGB. Ok he did add that it may not be visible as alot of content is Upscaled 1080p... but nevertheless when you pay £4,5,6000 for a 4k Display then you expect it is 4k across the whole of the screen. I wonder if Samsung, Sony and Panasonic's TV's are 3840 across?
Yes 2 weeks ago.Is that an up to date comment? I've not heard anyone say that about 2016 OLEDs
Thanks, Steve. This and your post at #11 have helped me reach a decision. I've been wavering over whether to buy an OLED now the prices have dropped, and have come so close several times, but it's a no for now. I know I definitely want an OLED - I've literally never seen a better picture - but I'll wait until next year and see what gets announced at CES, pick up a 2017 model.Yes you will, if it becomes necessary to use HDMI 2.1 then the receivers will also need to support that version. We're in the middle of the biggest upheaval in TV technology in the last two decades, so unless you absolutely have to buy a TV now, I'd wait to see what gets announced at CES.