AirCooledHeaven
Standard Member
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2005
- Messages
- 85
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 38
I'm agonising over whether to go for a 50hz or 100hz TV, I understand this is a subjective decision, but one I've still been unable to make, despite looking at many 50/100Hz sets.
I can find one set that looks great in one store and yet looks awful in another. I'm coming to the conclusion that it's impossible to make an objective comparison when places like Currys/comet/etc clearly have no idea how to display sets to demonstrate their true potential.
Looking through this forum for advice I see comments like "100hz/digital processing chews up a poor source (sky)" I don't have sky so I'd like to understand what a "poor source" really is. Is freeview a "poor source"? My new set will mainly be used for freeview, so if this is likely to be "chewed up" by 100Hz/digital processing then my decision becomes easier.
Thanks
I can find one set that looks great in one store and yet looks awful in another. I'm coming to the conclusion that it's impossible to make an objective comparison when places like Currys/comet/etc clearly have no idea how to display sets to demonstrate their true potential.
Looking through this forum for advice I see comments like "100hz/digital processing chews up a poor source (sky)" I don't have sky so I'd like to understand what a "poor source" really is. Is freeview a "poor source"? My new set will mainly be used for freeview, so if this is likely to be "chewed up" by 100Hz/digital processing then my decision becomes easier.
Thanks