1. Join Now

    AVForums.com uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

What are your main concerns when buying home cinema technology?

Discussion in 'News' started by Stuart Wright, May 18, 2005.

?
  1. Performance

    259 vote(s)
    62.0%
  2. Price

    38 vote(s)
    9.1%
  3. Retailer knowledge

    2 vote(s)
    0.5%
  4. Look

    1 vote(s)
    0.2%
  5. Reliability

    22 vote(s)
    5.3%
  6. Value

    62 vote(s)
    14.8%
  7. Features

    22 vote(s)
    5.3%
  8. Compatibility

    12 vote(s)
    2.9%
  1. Stuart Wright

    Stuart Wright
    AVForums Founder Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2000
    Messages:
    13,818
    Products Owned:
    6
    Products Wanted:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    167
    Location:
    Birmingham, UK
    Ratings:
    +9,551
    What are your main concerns when buying home cinema technology?
     
  2. Rasczak

    Rasczak
    Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2002
    Messages:
    21,204
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Location:
    Argyll
    Ratings:
    +2,261
    Most play a factor for me: features, compatibility (with existing and potentially future kit) and - to a much lesser extent - looks are all important elements depending on what is being brought. However I would have to say that the core issue for me is Performance. I always take time to demo equipment prior to buying it - if it isn't good enough to do what is required then the rest isn't important.

    Reliability is not really a big concern for me. Invariably buying new home cinema products they haven't been around long enough for such issues to arise. I would generally try to avoid some brands though...

    Price, value and retailer knowledge aren't really of any concern - although I won't buy products I think are vastly overpriced (IMHO Sky+ 160).
     
  3. eviljohn2

    eviljohn2
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2002
    Messages:
    7,529
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    86
    Location:
    Near London.
    Ratings:
    +208
    Value for me, I want the best I can get for the money I pay. That's why a lot of my equipment is second hand. :)
     
  4. LicensedTaximan

    LicensedTaximan
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2004
    Messages:
    2,344
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    86
    Location:
    London....City of contrast.
    Ratings:
    +499
    Quality of performance has to be the priority, but within the context of ones personal price range. Looks do come into it but that would not be a number one high factor, reliability would. :)
     
  5. Gary D

    Gary D
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2002
    Messages:
    7,770
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Ratings:
    +826
    Performance for me everytime. when i bought my new display i was after a top picture, the sound was secondary - in short i want it to be good at what its purpose is, not because it can play MP3's or make the tea and walk the dog. if a display retails at 2 grand then i want 95% percent of its budget spent on the picture.

    Looks aren't important but should never be underestimated. Value, thats always a tricky one and totally subjective. hey if i like it can afford it then hey its value for money.

    Gary
     
  6. lenny

    lenny
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2004
    Messages:
    429
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Paris
    Ratings:
    +6
    Value and then performance. I have always applied these two rules in sequence.

    Lenny
     
  7. Marc

    Marc
    Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2004
    Messages:
    11,610
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Location:
    Portsmouth
    Ratings:
    +1,081
    i think performance for me, although i don't claim to be an expert with AV equipment, i just try and get stuff that has good reviews, but value is definitely important to me too, i wouldnt spend £5000 on a plasma if a £2000 one was almost as good.
     
  8. rockhard

    rockhard
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    I try to get the best preformance at the budget I can afford which equals the best value ...

    I strive to upgrade whenever there is newer technology that improves on the previous but still maintains the value principle ..
     
  9. oxygenuk

    oxygenuk
    Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2004
    Messages:
    1,644
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Ratings:
    +13
    I Chose performance as thats priority, after that comes price then looks...
     
  10. Supra

    Supra
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2002
    Messages:
    430
    Products Owned:
    1
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    21
    Location:
    Kent
    Ratings:
    +14
    Fo rme it has to be performance, the best I can get for my budget :thumbsup:
     
  11. eviljohn2

    eviljohn2
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2002
    Messages:
    7,529
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    86
    Location:
    Near London.
    Ratings:
    +208
    I consider that to be value. :blush:
     
  12. twin_decks

    twin_decks
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    For me, Performance is the most desirable, but value was my main concern...

    I agree with previous posts too, that looks comes in pretty close, because sometimes it also has to sit there on standby, just lookin' good. :cool:
     
  13. AMc

    AMc
    Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2000
    Messages:
    5,626
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Location:
    Near Norwich
    Ratings:
    +2,184
    Has to be value for me - I could afford to spend more money on my kit (i.e. 'Performance' as a primary concern) but there is a balance between what it costs and how I use it. There is no point in shelling out £1000's for a set of speakers that for domestic reasons will only get used to their full potential for 2 hours a week. I consider the balance between performance, features and price to be a good definition of 'value'.
    YMMV
     
  14. Eddy Boy

    Eddy Boy
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    937
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    London
    Ratings:
    +27
    Performane matters to me with relability as well. Features is not so important beacuse I'll pick the best performing model with the features I am looking for.
     
  15. ahin4114

    ahin4114
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2004
    Messages:
    1,066
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    51
    Location:
    Reading
    Ratings:
    +48
    Ditto to Eddy Boy. There's no point having the greatest sounding amp on earth if it will only play on the second sunday after pentecost :)
     
  16. Zephyrius

    Zephyrius
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    Compatibility - seems to be a complete knightmare when purchasing a new display. Does one go for RGB SCART, component, DVI or HDMI. Does it support HDTV, HDCP, at what resolution, frequency, NTSC or PAL, ... aargh! Thank goodness I've got avforums to help!
     
  17. FazerThou

    FazerThou
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2003
    Messages:
    1,809
    Products Owned:
    1
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Location:
    Bath
    Ratings:
    +138
    Has to be price or we would all have the very best there is to offer. If your budget is £1K then you find the best for that and if its £50 K then the best for that.
     

Share This Page

Loading...