Do you think that when the Queen dies we should ditch the monarchy and become a Republic with an elected head of state?
Now that would end the monarchy!I find it strange that sone people in favour of the monarchy want to skip Charles - that's not how hereditary monarchy works I'm afraid, you've no say in the matter, no matter how awful they might be.
I don't see the point of a royal family, don't see them as being hard working. They do come across as being not particularly bright.
It would be amusing if we had some sort of freak "king Ralph" esque accident and Andrew ended up being king
I think Charles could as well.Now that would end the monarchy!
He’s not committed any crimes. Unless you count divorce as a crime.I think Charles could as well.
I am going to sound like Jacob Rees mogg here. I don't think it's acceptable for the future head of the church of England to be divorced and remarried. I'm not religious at all, but it goes against the teachings of the Bible.He’s not committed any crimes. Unless you count divorce as a crime.
On balance I think a stream lined monarchy is a positive thing for Britain. I don’t see how becoming a republic would change things for ordinary people given that the monarch has few real powers any longer. I’d prefer to see the abolition or major reform of the House of Lords first.
When was the Bible written? Weren’t people lucky to get beyond 40 years of age back then?I am going to sound like Jacob Rees mogg here. I don't think it's acceptable for the future head of the church of England to be divorced and remarried. I'm not religious at all, but it goes against the teachings of the Bible.
It's also ridiculous that the head of the church is an inherited title.
Wasn't the CoE founded especially to enable divorce?I am going to sound like Jacob Rees mogg here. I don't think it's acceptable for the future head of the church of England to be divorced and remarried. I'm not religious at all, but it goes against the teachings of the Bible.
It's also ridiculous that the head of the church is an inherited title.
God's opinion doesn't change as we are told.When was the Bible written? Weren’t people lucky to get beyond 40 years of age back then?
The Church of England was founded on divorce, only Cromwell made divorce within the monarchy an anathema again. Blame Mountbatten for Charles being forced into a marriage he did not really want, causing many people to be unhappy.I am going to sound like Jacob Rees mogg here. I don't think it's acceptable for the future head of the church of England to be divorced and remarried. I'm not religious at all, but it goes against the teachings of the Bible.
It's also ridiculous that the head of the church is an inherited title.
Depends who you listen to. I’ve asked her, she said it’s fine.God's opinion doesn't change as we are told.
Committing adultery is fairly high up in her no no lists too. I'm not religious at all, just find Charles being head of the church hypocritical.Depends who you listen to. I’ve asked her, she said it’s fine.
“Live long and prosper.”
Well I agree with her but most people, the ones who do it, don’t.Committing adultery is fairly high up in her no no lists too. I'm not religious at all, just find Charles being head of the church hypocritical.
I'd say he will be a very short lived monarch