1. Join Now

    AVForums.com uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

The Thing

Discussion in 'Movie Forum' started by drunkenmaster, Apr 6, 2005.

  1. drunkenmaster

    drunkenmaster
    Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,567
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    51
    Location:
    The Shaolin Temple
    Ratings:
    +44
    I was reading the posts on the best horror film thread and this film is mentioned quite a few times.

    So the obvious follow up to this is there a definitive version of this available on dvd?
     
  2. Kryters74

    Kryters74
    Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    239
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    21
    Location:
    London
    Ratings:
    +7
  3. markymark34

    markymark34
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2002
    Messages:
    3,241
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Location:
    Northern Ireland
    Ratings:
    +327
    seems like a good price! and a fantastic film, still looks good today. I bought it at xmas.

    mark
     
  4. Marc

    Marc
    Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2004
    Messages:
    11,610
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Location:
    Portsmouth
    Ratings:
    +1,081
    thats not the best version to get, as its non anamorphic. The new R1 collectors edition is the best since the picture is anamorphic for the first time. Only downside is you lose the isolated score, if thats something that interests you.
     
  5. Cloysterpeteuk

    Cloysterpeteuk
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2005
    Messages:
    4,262
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Location:
    Whitby, North Yorkshire
    Ratings:
    +836
    Don't buy the R2 2.35:1 non anamorphic is a joke!, I bought it and was gutted because I didn't do my homework :(. I got the R1 from Dvdsoon a while back so my brother got the R2.
     
  6. drunkenmaster

    drunkenmaster
    Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,567
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    51
    Location:
    The Shaolin Temple
    Ratings:
    +44
    Isolated score?? hmm enlighten me!!
     
  7. Marc

    Marc
    Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2004
    Messages:
    11,610
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Location:
    Portsmouth
    Ratings:
    +1,081
    well the original region 1, which you can get for a few quid off ebay sometimes was non anamorphic, but it did have a 2.0 stereo isolated score. The music in the movie is pretty good, so it'd be reason to choose this over the R2 non anamorphic version.

    edit: ive found out that the isolated score MIGHT be on the documentary rather than the movie.. not sure, and that sounds rather dumb, but that's what it looks like according to dvdcompare

    With regards to choosing anamorphic over non anamorphic, apparently the image quality on the anamorphic one isn't all that good and you can only really tell the difference on fairly large screens. if you've got a 28" or below i would say the non anamorphic one is probably ok.

    Unfortunately theres still no definitive version, but just you wait, i bet there will be another release for the 2007 25th Anniversary.
     
  8. Cloysterpeteuk

    Cloysterpeteuk
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2005
    Messages:
    4,262
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Location:
    Whitby, North Yorkshire
    Ratings:
    +836
    Can't tell the differance? Well what about the extra inches of screen you get with the anamorphic title!. Trying to view a 2.35:1 non anarmorphic title on a 28" widescreen is complete torture, most of the screen is taken up by black borders which gives you less image than borders. I also had the R2 Leon with these horrendous borders, thank god for the new R1 deluxe edition I can upgrade to.
     
  9. PJTX100

    PJTX100
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2004
    Messages:
    8,129
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Ratings:
    +562
    The Thing now available on an anamorphic transfer?

    I hate reading these forums, they keep costing me money! ;)

    Ah well, another film I'll have on vid and twice on DVD!

    ...PJ :)
     
  10. CrispyXUK

    CrispyXUK
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2003
    Messages:
    3,714
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Location:
    Land of the Living, Essex
    Ratings:
    +33
    you could use 16:9 zoom (not stretch)
     
  11. Indiana Jones

    Indiana Jones
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2003
    Messages:
    31,422
    Products Owned:
    1
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Location:
    Bristol
    Ratings:
    +6,178
    I had the R2 version for along time and having to use the zoom function to make it fill up as much of the screen as possible really did make the quality suffer so when the R1 Anamorphic version was released I upgraded and it is so much better so if you dont have The Thing and are thinking about buying it, defently go for the R1 Anamorphic release :thumbsup:
     
  12. FoxyMulder

    FoxyMulder
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    If you don't own it and want the best version go for the anamorphic region 1 edition, and if you want the soundtrack then hey buy the extremely cheap region 1 or 2 edition and that way you get best of both worlds.
     
  13. drunkenmaster

    drunkenmaster
    Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,567
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    51
    Location:
    The Shaolin Temple
    Ratings:
    +44
    Thanks for all the info I think I'll go for the R1
     
  14. the_pauley

    the_pauley
    Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2002
    Messages:
    4,066
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    86
    Ratings:
    +198
    Customers purchasing the above title may also enjoy the following feature... :D

    Watched it the other night - still a gem!
     
  15. videonasty

    videonasty
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2004
    Messages:
    2,259
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    51
    Location:
    West Midlands
    Ratings:
    +39
    What is the Region 1 packaging like?
     
  16. drunkenmaster

    drunkenmaster
    Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,567
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    51
    Location:
    The Shaolin Temple
    Ratings:
    +44
    Yes a classic as well - I know some prople who prefer the older version to John Carpenters retelling.
     
  17. Strangerer

    Strangerer
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    It doesn't make any difference if it's anamorphic or non-anamorphic it'll still have borders if the ratio is 2.35:1
     
  18. the_pauley

    the_pauley
    Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2002
    Messages:
    4,066
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    86
    Ratings:
    +198
    Yes, including Mr Carpenter. :)
     
  19. Markmw

    Markmw
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    Indeed - I think it's about time I got this. However, Amazon says its P&S. Is that true, or is the OAR 4:3 (which I wouldn't be surprised at)?? Snapper case tho - yuk!
     
  20. expat

    expat
    Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2003
    Messages:
    498
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Location:
    Berlin
    Ratings:
    +41
    The OAR is 1.37:1 (i.e. 4:3) -- not surprising for a film from 1951! :lesson:
     
  21. CrispyXUK

    CrispyXUK
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2003
    Messages:
    3,714
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Location:
    Land of the Living, Essex
    Ratings:
    +33
    I prefer carpenters version personally
     
  22. Cloysterpeteuk

    Cloysterpeteuk
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2005
    Messages:
    4,262
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Location:
    Whitby, North Yorkshire
    Ratings:
    +836
    Why do you say it won't make a difference?. A non anamorphic 2.35:1 title has far bigger borders than an anamorphic one!. That's a huge difference seeing as you only get half the screen visible with the non-anarmorphic one.
     
  23. PJTX100

    PJTX100
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2004
    Messages:
    8,129
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Ratings:
    +562
    This is deja-vu isn't it?

    Expect Smith to appear in the matrix any second! :)

    You are right, non anamorphic films should never see the light of day, there's more border than actual picture.

    Non anamorphic is :thumbsdow

    And I wish they'd make more releases in 1.78:1!! :lesson:

    All these 2.35:1 releases are getting tiresome.

    rant over!...PJ
     
  24. Cloysterpeteuk

    Cloysterpeteuk
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2005
    Messages:
    4,262
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Location:
    Whitby, North Yorkshire
    Ratings:
    +836
    Isn't it about time those dvd suppliers came out with an Anamorphic plus technique?, with 2.40:1 ratios and wider becoming ever more popular soon we'll be back to viewing more black than screen. Personally I would love everything to be optomized for 1.85:1 (the widest you can get without borders), I mean they give people 4:3 versions, but no version for people who actually want image to fill all of their widescreen, luncay I tell ya!. Thank god all the tv shows on disc are 1.85:1 or below, the day they start using movie style ratios is the day I explore with annoyance.
     
  25. PJTX100

    PJTX100
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2004
    Messages:
    8,129
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Ratings:
    +562
    Yep.

    Just one slight point, 16:9 is 1.78:1 not 1.85:1. Most widescreen TV's seem to make light of this and not show a gap for 1.85:1, some PJ's however still show a small gap top/bottom. The only true 1.78:1 DVD I have is Saving Private Ryan. Why more DVD's aren't produced like this I don't really know.

    I've just bought the R1 Apollo 13 disc with the IMAX version which is 1.66:1 I think - hence I'll get vertical borders, but much better than the 2.35:1 borders... must try it out tonight!...PJ :)
     
  26. Stuart Wright

    Stuart Wright
    AVForums Founder Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2000
    Messages:
    13,809
    Products Owned:
    6
    Products Wanted:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    167
    Location:
    Birmingham, UK
    Ratings:
    +9,528
    Sounds like your DVD player and/or display is not set up correctly.
    Whether it is anomorphic or not, the movie picture should have EXACTLY the same size on your display.
    Nice to see the old 'black borders' complaint is now 5 years old on these forums and still going strong.
    Your TV is 16:9 widescreen meaning that 16:9 TV transmissions will completely fill it, 1.85:1 movies will give you small borders top and bottom and 2.35:1 will give you bigger borders. Don't complain about the aspect the director chose to shoot the movie in, complain about the small size of your TV.
    Or even better, don't complain about it - go buy a projector.
     
  27. PJTX100

    PJTX100
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2004
    Messages:
    8,129
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Ratings:
    +562
    Hi Stuart.

    That's what I did! But you know what it's like, even when it's big there's still room for it to be bigger! ;)

    I watched Robot's at the cimena the other day - the AR was definitely not 2.35:1, more like 1.85:1.

    If Robots comes out on DVD as 2.35:1 there's summat funny going on!!

    ...PJ
     
  28. Stuart Wright

    Stuart Wright
    AVForums Founder Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2000
    Messages:
    13,809
    Products Owned:
    6
    Products Wanted:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    167
    Location:
    Birmingham, UK
    Ratings:
    +9,528
    Won't happen. Modern 'blockbusters' just wouldn't come out in the wrong AR.
     
  29. Blondie

    Blondie
    Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2005
    Messages:
    294
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Land of the Dead
    Ratings:
    +0
    Still all editions of this quality film do have the best commentry, from the man himself Mr C :clap:
     
  30. Cloysterpeteuk

    Cloysterpeteuk
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2005
    Messages:
    4,262
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Location:
    Whitby, North Yorkshire
    Ratings:
    +836
    I cannot afford that kind of equipment, nor do I have a room capable of supporting it due to strange dimensions.

    My tv is set up correctly as is the player (both Sony) and they both result in non-anamorphic titles having huge borders for 2.35:1 titles compared to there anamorphic counterparts, 1.85:1 ratios don't give me any borders at all. I've tried all the different viewing modes on two 28" tele's, all four of the players i've had over the years and the two non anamorphic discs (Leon, The Thing) that I mistakenly bought. All results were the same so why would you say that they were set up incorrectly?. If you do not get the same results on a 28" could you please tell me what settings I could possibly change that I have not tried. When watching such non-anamorphic titles I have to use the zoom option on the tele (instead of the standard 'wide') which just stretches the picture top and bottom, looks ghastly though.
     

Share This Page

Loading...