Can someone cuck themself? Don't you let someone cuck you? How would you go cuck yourself?Sweden cucks itself again
Can someone cuck themself? Don't you let someone cuck you? How would you go cuck yourself?
Says smart meter conspiracy boy
I never said anything directly about this "clamp down", just about that particular YouTube sheep. None of the dots are joining up over that smart meter conspiracy you copied and pasted.And yet all the dots are joining up, this being the latest clamp down on the internet as we know it...
I never said anything directly about this "clamp down", just about that particular YouTube sheep. None of the dots are joining up over that smart meter conspiracy you copied and pasted.
Sweden cucks itself again,
Article 13: Swedish MEPs allow directive to pass by mistake | TheINQUIRER
"
AFTER THE European Parliament voted on Tuesday to pass the Copyright Directive, including the much-criticised Article 13, some MEPs are now claiming that they voted for it by mistake.
It passed by just five votes, and European MPs from Sweden have now said that they didn't mean to support the motion."
Do the free ones make much money?VPN's about to get a sharp rise in profits
Opera has it built in.Do the free ones make much money?
BBC News - Article 13: Memes exempt as EU backs controversial copyright law
EU backs controversial copyright law
High-profile figures who have campaigned against the EU Copyright Directive include Wyclef Jean and web inventor Sir Tim Berners Lee, while Debbie Harry and Sir Paul McCartney have been among its supporters.
Big corporation controlling free speech.
Save the Internet
YouTube creators are currently bricking themselves with the "Is your content created with children viewers in mind" policy.
Especially when Youtube are using some pretty flakey algorithms to determine “what is for children”.
One of my hobbies is plastic modelling (panes, tanks, Airfix, Tamiya etc.). This is a dying hobby because children are not really interested in it these days. But the Youtube algorithm is commonly determining that plastic models are toys and that the military nature is not suitable for children so many if the creators are getting shut down notices.
Basically, the algorithm seems to work like this. The creator is making a model of a Heinkel He-111. This is about toys for children. That is a military aircraft, worse one that was used by Nazi Germany. The creator is trying to radicalise children with right wing Nazi beliefs. Shut the channel down
Cheers,
Nigel
It seems that what many might have enjoyed doing as kids is no longer deemed appropriate today by adults representing kids.
I'm now considering what to do with this on my channel as I will have video's coming from European WWII German fortifications, but will also be covering other European countries fortifications.
Would they serve me a shut down notification for including Nazi material, but ignore other defences that may have been built at other times of dubious history by the country concerned.
Would it not just be a case of the content and it's possible message, rather than a simple video showing the building of a Nazi era plane being the cause of a channel being shut down??? How would this work if the channel also showed the building of a Zero, Spitfire, Mustang & T34??
In the modelling community, it has been a long source of irritation that manufacturers are no longer allowed to supply Swastika decals for WWII Luftwaffe planes. This has been the case for many years.
It has pointed out that Swastikas regularly appear in TV and films and the response is that this is okay as it is portraying historical accuracy. So a perfect scale model is not historically accurate but films like Indiana Jone and Iron Sky are?
Essentially, the real reason is that someone has decided that models are toys and we can’t let children see Swastikas. This is why children are not allowed to Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark - oh, hang on, apparently they are allowed to see those Swastikas.
Just to add to the inconsistency, anyone, including children, can buy after-market Swastika decals to complete their models - go figure.
Cheers,
Nigel
Especially when Youtube are using some pretty flakey algorithms to determine “what is for children”.
One of my hobbies is plastic modelling (panes, tanks, Airfix, Tamiya etc.). This is a dying hobby because children are not really interested in it these days. But the Youtube algorithm is commonly determining that plastic models are toys and that the military nature is not suitable for children so many if the creators are getting shut down notices.
Basically, the algorithm seems to work like this. The creator is making a model of a Heinkel He-111. This is about toys for children. That is a military aircraft, worse one that was used by Nazi Germany. The creator is trying to radicalise children with right wing Nazi beliefs. Shut the channel down
I’m also into radio control aircraft and one model retailer posted a video that he had received a shut down warning. He reviews products, mostly fictitious sports planes but the algorithm had triggered a risk because occasionally there are reviews of military aircraft, regardless of the fact that these cost hundreds of pounds to get into the air, Youtube regards them as toys for young children. The guy got it sorted but it meant a lit if slog and personal contact with Youtube whereas to shut him down just needed the dodgy algorithm in a blink of an eye.
Cheers,
Nigel