cableman
Established Member
Cableman,
ENOUGH.
Lets deal with this straightaway.
I assume that this is the statement you are NOT happy about:
In no way have I stated that I am AWARE of any actual ties between your two companies and I certainly have made any attempt to state that this is a fact.
Just so you FULLY understand my intent, this was as a QUESTION, allowing you to actually confirm that you genuinely have no ties.
Taking this forward.
Libel is the written method to "reduce the standing or reputation of the person to whom the words are applied".
Links here:
Moderators and defamation - UK Business Forums
UK Law, UK Law forum, Defamation - What are Defamatory Words, , def, , , [email protected], David Swarbrick
Now, I've qualified my statement FULLY, such that you can understand where I'm coming from.
This is a two way street however, and you have made a DIRECT accusation of slander (which as it happens would need to verbal, but let's not get overtly technical eh).
So, I'll ask politely, back off or I'll raise a second report to the mods about your behaviour.
wheres the question mark then? what i FULLY understand is your accusatory inference- i still dont see a genuine apology for the obvious er, 'misunderstandng'
anytime Sir......
Last edited: