Nielo TM
Prominent Member
Hey guys
I have some few complex questions I would like to ask (hope you don't mind).
Few days ago, I though I fully understood cause of motion blur in interlaced sources but, I'm not quite sure anymore.
This is an image of what I thought to be the cause of motion blur in interlaced sources.
That image makes scene to me because I saw a great deal of commercials and programs in the past containing animated videos without any sign of motion blur.
When I played games that are rendered at 50/60fps (Call of Duty, PGR1, Timesplitters etc…, I failed to notice any motion blur and I'm pretty sure you haven't either.
Am I right in thinking that, when a full motion video (50/60fps) is converted from progressive to interlaced, the motion blur is eliminated? If the answer is yes, does my image represent the correct answer?
I have some few complex questions I would like to ask (hope you don't mind).
Few days ago, I though I fully understood cause of motion blur in interlaced sources but, I'm not quite sure anymore.
This is an image of what I thought to be the cause of motion blur in interlaced sources.
That image makes scene to me because I saw a great deal of commercials and programs in the past containing animated videos without any sign of motion blur.
When I played games that are rendered at 50/60fps (Call of Duty, PGR1, Timesplitters etc…, I failed to notice any motion blur and I'm pretty sure you haven't either.
Am I right in thinking that, when a full motion video (50/60fps) is converted from progressive to interlaced, the motion blur is eliminated? If the answer is yes, does my image represent the correct answer?