Sony KD-55AF9 (AF9/A9F) OLED TV Review & Comments

Discussion in 'Sony TVs Forum' started by Phil Hinton, Nov 6, 2018.


    1. Phil Hinton

      Phil Hinton
      Editor Staff Member

      Joined:
      Jan 18, 2001
      Messages:
      10,260
      Products Owned:
      3
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Location:
      AVForums
      Ratings:
      +8,480
      The MASTER SERIES AF9 OLED from Sony boasts picture quality that gets you closer to what the creator intended with support for Dolby Vision, HDR10 and featuring a form of Dynamic Tone Mapping and the Acoustic Surface+.
      Read the review.


      Write your own review for Sony KD-55AF9

      This review would not have been possible without the support of

      [​IMG]
      If you are thinking about buying a new TV and want to support our reviews, you can give Richard a call on 01302 365760 or email [email protected] and mention AVForums.
       
      • Thanks Thanks x 8
      • Like Like x 3
      • List
    2. Ripsnorter

      Ripsnorter
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Jan 17, 2015
      Messages:
      335
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      64
      Location:
      UK
      Ratings:
      +354
      Unlike Phil I was unable to overlook the lean back, although this could be down to us viewing the set at different heights. The price is also a negative, especially when there are so many great OLEDs on the market now, and not forgetting Samsung's Q9 either.
       
      • Agree Agree x 3
      • Thanks Thanks x 1
      • List
    3. stevebk

      stevebk
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Apr 14, 2013
      Messages:
      554
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      66
      Location:
      Dorset
      Ratings:
      +423
      As always very thankful for the reviews from AV Forums, and thanks to Crampton & Moore.

      As you have had hands on with Sony AF9 when compared to the Panasonic Oled "Picture Quality Only" my question is:
      I am finding it hard to understand how Sony can justify such a high price tag. I can'thelp thinking they try to fool the public and say "it cost more because it'd a better picture" is it a better picture ??
       
    4. Ripsnorter

      Ripsnorter
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Jan 17, 2015
      Messages:
      335
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      64
      Location:
      UK
      Ratings:
      +354
      Sony has always considered itself not only a top brand but also the top tier one. In the past it was first out of the gate with technology and features and charged a premium for it (I vaguely recall a then head of Panasonic joking that his company's test lab was called Sony!). But that also brought arrogance, hubris and then hard times. Leaving aside the AF9's qualities, I think this is Sony seeking to regain the, in its own eyes, position it feels it lost (rightly so) and wishes to reoccupy (undeservedly: times have moved on). In short: the 'Sony Price Premium' is back and consumers need to take this down a peg.
       
    5. stevebk

      stevebk
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Apr 14, 2013
      Messages:
      554
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      66
      Location:
      Dorset
      Ratings:
      +423
      I agree what wat you are saying, in the past Sony did put them selfs on that pedestal, and I think they still do...
      I am a person that says you get you you pay for, and if the price is justified on the product then so be it. Spend and enjoy..

      It's fantastic to see Sony bring the AF9 and to include DV, and the other features good on them. Also a different direction with the design, and sound from the screen doesn't distort the picture quality, thats brilliant.. I personally love the Sony.
      If all these features are where Sony say the price is justified, then ok.

      This year we have had tv's & quality sound in one unit, the Panasonic FZ £1999, Phillips 903 £2499 & Sony AF9 £2999 !!! all have gone the route of stepping up the quality of the sound. Sound is important and it's good to see this direction from manufacturers, but the (picture quality) is what I watch a tv for.
      Is £2999 justified ?
      Difficult question I think..:thumbsdow
       
      • Like Like x 1
      • Agree Agree x 1
      • List
    6. IsaacJDean

      IsaacJDean
      Standard Member

      Joined:
      Jan 28, 2017
      Messages:
      24
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      6
      Location:
      Cheshire, UK
      Ratings:
      +16
      Vincent Teoh of HDTVTest found the autocal feature to introduce posterization as well so probably best to mention that to whoever will be calibrating your TV
       
    7. Venrith

      Venrith
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Nov 17, 2012
      Messages:
      269
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      43
      Location:
      Loughborough
      Ratings:
      +108
      Nice review, I still cannot decide between the AF9 and the Panasonic Fz802 though.. Both seem like excellent tv's
       
    8. Ripsnorter

      Ripsnorter
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Jan 17, 2015
      Messages:
      335
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      64
      Location:
      UK
      Ratings:
      +354
      I'm the same: the price has to be justified. There will be some who find the Sony price no obstacle because they are swayed by the design, features, picture, sound etc. Or even just by the company name itself. Due to previous experience with Sony I am not a fan and so won't be going down their route. In the end we pay our money and make our choices, but here there is still too large a gap between price and performance. As you write: "Is £2999 justified?" For some it is a no-brainer, for others a no-sale.
       
      • Like Like x 1
      • Agree Agree x 1
      • List
    9. stevebk

      stevebk
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Apr 14, 2013
      Messages:
      554
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      66
      Location:
      Dorset
      Ratings:
      +423
      Spending £2999 I am expecting it not to need calibrating :lesson:
       
      • Funny Funny x 3
      • Like Like x 1
      • List
    10. SPINO

      SPINO
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Sep 29, 2008
      Messages:
      1,687
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      66
      Ratings:
      +183
      Shame about the remote , it’s the same as I have for my XE 900 .. what happened to progress ..
       
    11. dave1956a

      dave1956a
      Active Member

      Joined:
      May 21, 2011
      Messages:
      916
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      66
      Ratings:
      +493
      Now I get very confused here, in the review it says "They openly state that the aim is to get image quality that gets incredibly close to that of their studio OLED monitor."

      Ok I get that and that's fine, but as I understand it the AF9 comes with a white point that is not D65 cos the pro Sony monitor does not have D65.

      So if the AF9 OOTB looks like the pro monitor and the studio used the pro monitor when colour grading the film then the AF9 will look as close as poss to what the colourist saw with his/her eyes when grading the film.

      So why would anyone have the AF9 set to D65 if after doing so it will no longer look as close as poss to the pro monitor ?

      BTW good to read full disclosure on where the review set came from
       
    12. steviedr

      steviedr
      Distinguished Member

      Joined:
      May 23, 2006
      Messages:
      5,625
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Ratings:
      +3,502
      While Sony don't tend to have too many price drops and are expensive, I think its unfair comparing a brand new oled price with oleds from 5 months ago (5 months is a long time in AV land :) )
       
      Last edited: Nov 6, 2018
    13. diesel72

      diesel72
      Standard Member

      Joined:
      Feb 9, 2016
      Messages:
      17
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      3
      Location:
      Belfast
      Ratings:
      +3
      Thanks for the excellent review @Phil Hinton. Given that you had the AF8 on long term test recently, can I ask how the HDR10 performance compares and how much of a difference the dynamic tone mapping makes?
       
    14. Diagnosticz

      Diagnosticz
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Jul 17, 2012
      Messages:
      3,215
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      136
      Ratings:
      +866
      I think the high price tag is due to the manufacture costs of the speakers and the stand design.

      Sony should have like other brands given us an option not to include the speaker system and in turn reduce the price for those who like me would never use tv speakers regardless of how good they compared to other manufactures.

      I have seen this tv in action in a dark room in with Numerous HDR disks SDR 1080p content and it is as good or betters the Panasonic FZ range. Look wise the tv looks amazing i think the LG E8 in ots price range is the only tv that when you see it for the first time you know its a premium set.

      The tone mapping is outstanding on this set. It is in my opinion the most detailed image i have seen on A tv. Sony have opted for more details over a brighter image but how bright does one want it, it goes bright enough.

      Compared to say a LG C8 which to many gives the opinion of having the best HDR image due to the brighter impactful Image don't be be fooled its a great set i own one. I did not need a side by side comparison. i watched content i am familiar with The Sony is Superior in every aspect it just looks so natural. There is a reason why it has a high price tag but i ma sure that will come down in the the next few months
       
      • Agree Agree x 3
      • Like Like x 1
      • Thanks Thanks x 1
      • List
    15. raduv1

      raduv1
      Distinguished Member

      Joined:
      Mar 24, 2006
      Messages:
      13,755
      Products Owned:
      1
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      167
      Location:
      kent
      Ratings:
      +9,200
      I really do not want a Sony OLED display due to its price point . It is however the only OLED ( due to its unique footprint ) where I can upgrade to a 65" from my 58" , even the upward tilt works for us as our current display sits just a tad below our seating position. It would still take some 're jiggling but all other manufacturer OLEDs would mean going from 58" to 55" .
       
    16. Diagnosticz

      Diagnosticz
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Jul 17, 2012
      Messages:
      3,215
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      136
      Ratings:
      +866
      Wall mount it if possible
       
    17. raduv1

      raduv1
      Distinguished Member

      Joined:
      Mar 24, 2006
      Messages:
      13,755
      Products Owned:
      1
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      167
      Location:
      kent
      Ratings:
      +9,200
      Not possible I'm afraid .
       
    18. Joe C

      Joe C
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Dec 4, 2014
      Messages:
      1,612
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      116
      Location:
      London
      Ratings:
      +792

      They don’t include DV. They include half-baked DV where external devices take on the processing.

      I’ve owned Sony TV’s for longer than I can remember, but went LG for my current cinema room TV as I’m not paying £1k more for something that won’t be compatible with some of my DV capable stuff because Sony can’t be bothered
       
      • Agree Agree x 2
      • Like Like x 1
      • Useful Useful x 1
      • List
    19. Phil Hinton

      Phil Hinton
      Editor Staff Member

      Joined:
      Jan 18, 2001
      Messages:
      10,260
      Products Owned:
      3
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Location:
      AVForums
      Ratings:
      +8,480
      Yes, there is a difference that I personally think is better with the AF9. But be aware that both the AF8 and AF9 still struggle to provide a decent Dolby Vision image.
       
    20. Diagnosticz

      Diagnosticz
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Jul 17, 2012
      Messages:
      3,215
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      136
      Ratings:
      +866
      I owned a LG B7 and the DV was not good it was dark just like the Sony, it was one of the earlier TV to have DV and there where some issues. i now own a LGC8 and the DV is very impressive indeed. A huge improvement so it can be sorted out. I am sure Sony will fix this it was just surprising that Sony got it wrong in the first place. It's not only Sony's reputation on the line its its Dolby so i have no doubt they are both working on a fix. But saying all that Sony's' own tone mapping is so impressive it makes up for it
       
    21. clydebest

      clydebest
      Distinguished Member

      Joined:
      May 25, 2011
      Messages:
      8,859
      Products Owned:
      1
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Location:
      Bristol
      Ratings:
      +4,537
      About pricing at the Weekend the AF9 65 inch was £3499 and the 55 inch £2599 but not from Crapton and Moore..wish i had submitted a PM with JL now .
       
      • Like Like x 1
      • Useful Useful x 1
      • List
    22. Dixie4

      Dixie4
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Nov 23, 2006
      Messages:
      833
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      96
      Ratings:
      +551
      Is this just with the apps ? How is DV watching 4K discs ?
       
    23. zeppelino

      zeppelino
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Jan 24, 2018
      Messages:
      2,288
      Products Owned:
      1
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      114
      Location:
      UK
      Ratings:
      +549
      Says in the review that he couldn’t test discs due to player not supporting Sony’s DV profile.
       
    24. steviedr

      steviedr
      Distinguished Member

      Joined:
      May 23, 2006
      Messages:
      5,625
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Ratings:
      +3,502
      I had always assumed Sony decided to go with DV a few days before CES’17 and surprised many including their engineers :) that was the reason for their lite version.
      This isn’t factual but that’s the impression I got.
       
    25. clydebest

      clydebest
      Distinguished Member

      Joined:
      May 25, 2011
      Messages:
      8,859
      Products Owned:
      1
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Location:
      Bristol
      Ratings:
      +4,537
      Yes a A8 1/2 Without the fancy sound and a drop in price would have hit the sweet spot.
       
      • Like Like x 1
      • Agree Agree x 1
      • List
    26. zeppelino

      zeppelino
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Jan 24, 2018
      Messages:
      2,288
      Products Owned:
      1
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      114
      Location:
      UK
      Ratings:
      +549
      Well, they’ve had a lot of time since but still their DV remains the same.
       
    27. Goldorak

      Goldorak
      Distinguished Member

      Joined:
      Jul 30, 2011
      Messages:
      5,387
      Products Owned:
      1
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Location:
      Kent uk
      Ratings:
      +4,286
      Superb review and confirms how good this set is. However, and I am going to surprise many including Phil. I don’t believe this set deserves a 9 until Sony sort the DV issue.
      This half backed DV implementation should be called out. Sony is being lazy and can do full blown dv with latest SOC.
      If LG can do it, so can Sony and they bl**dy should at this price!!!
       
    28. stevebk

      stevebk
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Apr 14, 2013
      Messages:
      554
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      66
      Location:
      Dorset
      Ratings:
      +423
      Full price at JL
       
    29. xfilian

      xfilian
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Dec 26, 2008
      Messages:
      330
      Products Owned:
      1
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      46
      Ratings:
      +187
      Thought long and hard about waiting for this or going for the Panasonic FZ802. In the end I opted for the latter and am glad I did. For the extra £1000+ I would be hoping that the AF9 blows the Panny and other associated sets out of the water. I am not doubting it is a fabulous set - just not fabulous enough to warrant that kind of hike in price.
       
    30. Joe C

      Joe C
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Dec 4, 2014
      Messages:
      1,612
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      116
      Location:
      London
      Ratings:
      +792
      That means Sony have got it wrong with successive TV’s. And the points you make don’t address what I said.

      I moved to an LG C7 when my B6 went, and there was a big improvement there. The C8 is nowhere near the same step up
       

    Share This Page

    Loading...
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice