Sky celebrates 20th Birthday

Discussion in 'Sky Digital TV Forum' started by Phil Hinton, Feb 5, 2009.

  1. Phil Hinton

    Phil Hinton
    Editor Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2001
    Messages:
    10,469
    Products Owned:
    3
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Location:
    AVForums
    Ratings:
    +9,173
    It might not feel like it was 20 years ago that Sky’s TV channels became available to the British public, but Thursday the 5th of February 2009 marked the 20th birthday of Sky TV. In a world where 24hr programming is now common place, it’s incredible to look back and remember that British TV in 1989 consisted of just four terrestrial channels, most of which closed down around midnight.

    That’s not to say that SKY was an instant success. Its requirement for a satellite dish and expensive box certainly put off most from initially signing up for this new TV service. However, one thing Sky has managed to do over the years is turn to innovation in its products and programming, helping them achieve widespread acceptance in today’s entertainment world. And probably the biggest draw right from the start has been a unique stance in covering live sports programming. You only have to look at the archives of how the BBC and ITV covered football to see the unique steps Sky took in changing how we watch the beautiful game. Multi camera coverage, super slow motion replays and in 1999 they introduced the first ever interactive football coverage. But it doesn’t just stop there, who would have imagined that a 24hr news channel would be needed in our country back in 1989? Not many people thought so, but Sky News has for the last 20 years been the forerunner in Europe for instant news coverage and innovation. They won the first of their 21 RTS awards way back in 1993 and have continued to offer unique ways to get up to date with the latest headlines. The organisation won 3 Bafta awards in 2002, one for it’s coverage of the harrowing 9/11 tragedy.

    Readers may wonder what the big deal is about a pay TV organisation reaching its 20th birthday, and if it was just a pay TV channel we would probably agree. However, as AV fans we think it is a very important milestone and nobody can deny that SKY have pushed the TV boundaries over the last 20 years. From interactive features to Sky Plus and now High Definition and possibly 3D TV very soon. It has been down to one TV Company that these services become widespread and accepted by the public at large. With 31 HD services now running and more planned along with its continued sports and entertainment productions, Sky haven’t just taken the subscription money and run. In terms of Audio visual technology the company are undeniably pushing the boundaries for viewers to experience new and exciting products and programming, with the others left to catch up.

    Whether you are a fan of SKY TV or not, we certainly feel you cannot deny the fact that they have helped develop the way TV is delivered and watched by up to 9 million households. The fact that the organisation is pushing HDTV in a way the terrestrial channels could never have managed and offering glimpses of future technology yet to come, you cannot say that SKY are not investing in a better service for viewers.

    We don’t normally take much notice at TV organisations reaching a birthday like this, but AVForums certainly feels that SKY have, for better or worse, been a driving force behind TV change in the UK and helped push much of the technology us AV Fans now enjoy today.

    Happy Birthday Sky from everyone at AVForums.com

    Look back at SKY TV from the past and on to the future at their new website Sky 20 years on...
     
    Last edited: Feb 5, 2009
  2. newhit

    newhit
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    Messages:
    62
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Ratings:
    +7
    I am a Sky subscriber, and don't want to dump it but, regarding the football coverage, I'm not overly happy. There are too many times when the camera cuts to somebody in the crowd or the manager or some no name celeb just when you want to see how the play is panning out. If I ever want to know all about bald patches all I have to do is wait every two or three seconds for another close up of the back of some players head who has nothing to do with the current ball movement or setup of the game. Having said that you have to laugh at ITV's gaff at missing the Everton goal (even if it was a dull game).
     
  3. toddy28

    toddy28
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2007
    Messages:
    3,650
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Ratings:
    +686
    i was 10 when sky came out i remember my parents got it from a offer in the sun paper and we were one of the first in our area to get it and it was amazing to have so many channels good luck to them there not perfect but they have changed tv in this country in so many ways for the better :thumbsup:
     
  4. Trollslayer

    Trollslayer
    Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2007
    Messages:
    26,156
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Location:
    Poole
    Ratings:
    +10,983
    I agree about Sky moving HD forwards, they keep investing in better headend equipment which allows more HD (and a few more SD) channels. :thumbsup:
     
  5. STdrez625

    STdrez625
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,100
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    London
    Ratings:
    +79
    Bread and Circuses...Tesco for the Bread, Sky for the Circus
    Ban all Satellite Dishes in Towns, Reduce Premiership money to £26 million per season, equally shared. Enforce Media ownership Rules. Never Vote for a MurDocH, Now or in the Future, Lest we end up like Italy.
     
  6. mjcairney

    mjcairney
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    7,294
    Products Owned:
    2
    Products Wanted:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    137
    Location:
    Airdrie, Scotland
    Ratings:
    +1,079
    There is no doubt about it, love the or loathe them, they have innovated TV and look set to continue to do so.

    Cheers,

    Martin.
     
  7. SeanT

    SeanT
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2005
    Messages:
    6,156
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Location:
    Coventry
    Ratings:
    +368
    Are they going to celebrate their birthday with some more price rises though... (they already announced that their broadband was going up, but "generously" gave existing customers a "discount" back down to the old price for a year...)
     
  8. J4CK DANIELS

    J4CK DANIELS
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,483
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Ratings:
    +231
    I'm not too fussed about HD or the amount of channels sky have to offer, but what continues to impress me is Sky+! Simple, effective and really has changed the way we all watch TV! fair play Mr Murdoch (perhaps time to give some of the profit back though?... i'm skint!)

    :thumbsup:
     
  9. Flugzeugler

    Flugzeugler
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2005
    Messages:
    828
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Location:
    Leeds
    Ratings:
    +38
    I got satellite TV in 1990. I'm trying to remember the channel line up. Something like:

    Screensport
    Eurosport
    Sky Channel
    Sky News
    CNN
    Bravo
    Sky Movies
    One other?

    There were also some German channels RTL1, RTL2, Sat1, RTL Nachtrichten(?) and more.
     
  10. Jimmer

    Jimmer
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2006
    Messages:
    696
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Location:
    The Lakes
    Ratings:
    +125
  11. David Mackenzie

    David Mackenzie
    Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2003
    Messages:
    10,351
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Location:
    Glasgow, UK
    Ratings:
    +1,312
    Happy birthday Sky. I don't really care for actual television as it stands for various reasons (or for the prices you have to pay to access it), but I have a lot of respect for them for giving the snooty British TV world a well-needed slap.

    One thing though - why not bring back the cool glitzy idents you had in the 90s, when satellite TV felt special instead of just another delivery method? The minimalist stuff you had last time I watched just wasn't the same.
     
    Last edited: Feb 6, 2009
  12. Ian J

    Ian J
    Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2001
    Messages:
    25,639
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Ratings:
    +4,906
    You must be joking. Sky + isn't a patch on Tivo which was far more flexible in every way. The only reason that my Tivo was replaced by Sky + is that the hardware was never updated for the digital age in the UK. I doubt whether you will find anyone who has used Tivo who will agree that Sky + is better
     
  13. J4CK DANIELS

    J4CK DANIELS
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,483
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Ratings:
    +231
    I agree my friends but it was a shame that Tivo didn't have the support it deserved, I kinda meant Sky changed the way that the UK watched TV I totally agree there was and is many PVR's that are better but this to me is the complete 'package'! :)
     
  14. Stevenage Neil

    Stevenage Neil
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2008
    Messages:
    9,826
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    133
    Ratings:
    +897
    mtv ?
     
  15. David Mackenzie

    David Mackenzie
    Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2003
    Messages:
    10,351
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Location:
    Glasgow, UK
    Ratings:
    +1,312
    Sky Arts?
     
  16. leitchyleck

    leitchyleck
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2008
    Messages:
    218
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Ratings:
    +17


    canal+ (french i think)
     
  17. Stuart Wright

    Stuart Wright
    AVForums Founder Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2000
    Messages:
    14,888
    Products Owned:
    7
    Products Wanted:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    167
    Location:
    Birmingham, UK
    Ratings:
    +10,886
    Sky could still really innovate by removing the DOGS from the Sky channels.
     
  18. Ian J

    Ian J
    Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2001
    Messages:
    25,639
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Ratings:
    +4,906
    They annoyed me when I had a 32" CRT and even more so with a 42" plasma. Now that I have upsized to a 50" plasma I find that they are too intrusive
     
  19. David Mackenzie

    David Mackenzie
    Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2003
    Messages:
    10,351
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Location:
    Glasgow, UK
    Ratings:
    +1,312
    They're one of the main reasons I don't subscribe. Dogg'd video is degraded video.
     
  20. IAN P

    IAN P
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2002
    Messages:
    8,285
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Ratings:
    +1,042
    I remember the furore when they experimented with the D O G S on the film channels,i think it lasted a few days before they wisely retreated.:D
     
  21. PoochJD

    PoochJD
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2000
    Messages:
    11,006
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    133
    Location:
    Norwich
    Ratings:
    +1,861
    HI,

    Whilst I don't "love" Sky the company, I do like the variety of channels Sky offers me, and the choice it gives me the viewer, compared to the five main terrestrial channels.

    Yes, Sky has problems, (Channel DOGS; interactive icons like the Red Button, Remind Me Now, etc,; lots of terrrible channels that are of interest to no one, and some of the dumbest channel continuity announcers this side of the Space-Time Continuum), but for the most part it gives me the chance to see material that has been constantly denied to me by terrestrial.

    With Ofcom wanting Channel 4 to merge with either Five or BBC Worldwide, it seems terrestrial TV is only going to get worse rather than better. :( Channel 4 should be forced to go it alone, not merge with other companies. I know what would happen if it did merge with Five: it would bring Five down to the lowest common denominator that Channel 4 has become over the past ten years or so, and Five is about the only decent terrestrial channel left.

    So, congratulations to Sky for making TV choice better for the viewer. You've made mistakes, but let's hope that your next 20 years concentrate more on what the viewers want from you, rather than what you want from the viewers! :lesson:


    Pooch
     
  22. 961

    961
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2006
    Messages:
    4,675
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Location:
    Berwickshire
    Ratings:
    +667
    No lover of Murdoch, R I have to say that he put his money where his mouth was when no one gave him a hope in hell of making a go of Sky

    If you look at the squarial and the ITV dogsview jobbie with ondigital boxes, you have to say he has stuck with it and, today, his Sky service is to be admired

    Sky News, more often than not, gets the news on air before the Beeb. I watched as Jeremy Thompson walked up a deserted street in Kosovo risking his life

    You want to watch sport live, UNINTERRUPTED, there really is no alternative. The BBC is almost always either not live or edited highlights or late at night when you know the result. Or wall to wall Darts or Carpet bowls

    And today, I am watching the test match from the Windies in Hi-Def. You may think this bandwidth from 4000 miles comes cheap. Think again

    Thanks Rupert. It's good value

    (Just don't put the price up, we're credit crunching here!:hiya:)
     
  23. Miyazaki

    Miyazaki
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2003
    Messages:
    14,393
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Ratings:
    +850
    I think sky have too much of a monopoly and should be broken up and/or forced to sell parts of the business to others.

    Regarding the issue of choice, I don't believe that sky increases the quality of television at all.

    The license fee represents greater value for money.

    With sky you have a subscription and adverts.

    It should be one or the other IMO.
     
  24. kopchoir

    kopchoir
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2007
    Messages:
    25,220
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Location:
    Anfield Theatre of Reality
    Ratings:
    +5,455
    I only have sky for the beautifull game and boy does it look beautifull in hd there have been times where my sky bill was extortionate almost
    £100 a month last year.
    I dont care about thier business nor rupert all i care about is i get to watch some footy i said in another thread i would rather pay my sky bill than my mortgage:p
     
  25. Ian J

    Ian J
    Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2001
    Messages:
    25,639
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Ratings:
    +4,906
    They may have adverts on Sky but who watches them. I record everything and watch it later - sometimes just 15 minutes later so that I can fast forward over the ads.

    Other times I wash up in the ad breaks :(
     
  26. Miyazaki

    Miyazaki
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2003
    Messages:
    14,393
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Ratings:
    +850
    But if its battlestar galactica and you've been waiting 7 days to watch it, 15 minutes is too long to wait :eek:
     
  27. namuk

    namuk
    Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2006
    Messages:
    22,187
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Ratings:
    +4,332
    yea the day they ruined tv, can i have a free pass :thumbsup:
     
  28. beasty54

    beasty54
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2005
    Messages:
    6,196
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Location:
    Lincoln
    Ratings:
    +530
    :eek: Do you not have a woman :D
     
  29. volatileacid

    volatileacid
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    51
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Location:
    London, England
    Ratings:
    +3

    Complete and UTTER rubbish.
     
  30. David Mackenzie

    David Mackenzie
    Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2003
    Messages:
    10,351
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Location:
    Glasgow, UK
    Ratings:
    +1,312
    Ban satellite dishes? Why would anyone want to restrict anyone's freedom of information in that way?

    From what I've heard, Rupert Murdoch's political views are very, very different to mine, but if consumers were to boycott every service or product that had the involvement of someone they didn't agree with... well, you know the rest.

    But one thing I do agree with him on, relates to elitism in the UK media. There's a quote from him where he says "much of what passes for quality television in the UK is actually dictated by a narrow-minded elite" (paraphrased). I don't think it's around so much now, but seemingly when satellite TV was new in the UK, there was an underlying snooty attitude where if something didn't conform to BBC's principles then it was cheap crap.

    Now I don't think anyone is ever going to argue that shows like Jerry Springer or America's Dumbest Criminals are top-notch TV, but quality in the arts is ultimately subjective, which certain notions of "quality TV" don't sit with me.
     

Share This Page

Loading...