Ed Selley
Hi-Fi Editor
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2003
- Messages
- 12,046
- Reaction score
- 5,503
- Points
- 3,078
- Age
- 43
I'm still up for expensive IEM's from non-mass market companies, but for "less critical" (I hate that phrase), I'm up for wireless now having tried some.Completely different opinion to What HiFi! I’ve liked most of the Sennheisers I have tried but I think my days of using expensive (and wired) in ears are past.
Yeah, I’d use wireless IEM’s for convenience when out walking but in the house it is always over the ear for comfort. I know some of the expensive IEM’s have amazing sound quality but they’re just not for me.I'm still up for expensive IEM's from non-mass market companies, but for "less critical" (I hate that phrase), I'm up for wireless now having tried some.
LOL. It is all relative, some headphones cost more than £1000 so in that context these are reasonable. It really depends on how serious you are about listening to music through headphones/earphones. I think my Sennheiser HD800S was worth every penny but others wouldn’t spend more than £50. But then I think £25 a month for Sky is a waste of money, I don’t drink or smoke so music is my main hobby/vice.avforum guys must be loaded in the financial sense and drugs if £250 is reasonable. Can I have a job please?