1. Join Now

    AVForums.com uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Ruark vita 100 or vita 50 subwoofer

Discussion in 'Subwoofers' started by pipbull, Aug 11, 2005.

  1. pipbull

    pipbull
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    Hi.

    Can anyone recommend any of the above subs to go with my wharfedale diamond 9.1,s. I know bigger is probably better but i want a good match to the diamonds.

    Any experience of either sub from anyone would be greatly appreciated.

    Listen to all styles of music and would also like to use one set of the sub 's inputs from my sony 5.1 receiver for movies.

    many thanks

    Phil
     
  2. temp649

    temp649
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    I have a Vita 50 with a pair of Boston Micro 100x's, and I'm very happy with it. Better for music than for serious HT grunt, IMO.

    OTOH, this is the first sub I've owned, and we sit pretty close to the sound source (about 2m), so YMMV!

    If your room is larger, by all accounts the BK XLS200 is well worth a look.
     
  3. eviljohn2

    eviljohn2
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2002
    Messages:
    7,529
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    86
    Location:
    Near London.
    Ratings:
    +208
    In this case I think that bigger is better. The 10" driver and 100W amp panel should make the Vita 50s 8" driver and 50W panel look a bit silly. :)
     
  4. pipbull

    pipbull
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    Thanks Gents.

    Decided to go for the Vita 100. Hopefully will also give me deeper bass for the movies and be just as musical for the Hi-Fi. IE Able to keep up with the speed of the Wharfedale 9.1's.
     

Share This Page

Loading...