1. Join Now

    AVForums.com uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Response Times - LCD's

Discussion in 'LCD & LED LCD TVs' started by Damo121, Sep 24, 2004.

  1. Damo121

    Damo121
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    836
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    21
    Ratings:
    +23
    Is it the higher the response time on a LCD, the better or the worse.

    Cheers

    Damo :)
     
  2. Steve_P

    Steve_P
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2004
    Messages:
    1,338
    Products Owned:
    1
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    67
    Ratings:
    +142
    Lower response times = better picture, i.e. less smearing as the individual pixels can switch brightness/colour faster.

    Higher response times = worse picture, picture can be prone to smearing as the pixels lag behind what should be displayed.

    S.
     
  3. Bob Todd

    Bob Todd
    Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2000
    Messages:
    3,080
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Location:
    UK
    Ratings:
    +373
    Thats not totally true Steve you might get a lightning fast panel which has poor contrast and brightness.

    But the lower the Ms steve is right, the less ghsoting or blurring you will see on fast action scenes
     
  4. Steve_P

    Steve_P
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2004
    Messages:
    1,338
    Products Owned:
    1
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    67
    Ratings:
    +142
    Ironduke,

    Perhaps I should have been more clear, I didn't mean to imply a lower figure meant a panel could have better contrast/brightness... a lower response figure means that a pixel can change state faster. For a pixel to change state it is changing from one colour to another or from one brightness value to another. Of course as you say if a panel has lightning reaction times but an overall contrast ratio of 50:1 it'll still look utter pants.

    The original question was relating to response time only and no other factors.

    S.
     
  5. richard plumb

    richard plumb
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2002
    Messages:
    14,294
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    133
    Location:
    Windsor
    Ratings:
    +1,017
    For what its worth, its quite straightforward. a 16ms response time is quick enough to support 60Hz updating, so would be enough for any NTSC video source, or games console in 60Hz mode.

    Many PC monitors are often 25ms, which is slightly slower, but not the end of the world if budget is the main issue.

    16ms is also the threshold at which a manufacturer can describe its sets as LCD 'TVs' and not monitors.
     

Share This Page

Loading...