1. Join Now

    AVForums.com uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Receiver or Amp.... whats best for 5.1 surround??

Discussion in 'AV Receivers & Amplifiers' started by samjenkins, Jan 4, 2003.

  1. samjenkins

    samjenkins
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    Receiver or Amp.... whats best for 5.1 surround??
     
  2. mjn

    mjn
    Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2001
    Messages:
    18,385
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Location:
    Herts, England
    Ratings:
    +5,471
    which is better my red car or your white car?

    doesn't make a difference
     
  3. samjenkins

    samjenkins
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    so why do receivers seem much cheaper than amps?
     
  4. sounddog

    sounddog
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2002
    Messages:
    3,373
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    107
    Location:
    Leicestershire, UK
    Ratings:
    +461
    AV Recievers are just AV Amps with a radio tuner added.

    Often the AV Recievers are lower end products where as at the very high end, users don't want the radio so Denon / Pioneer / Marantz / etc make Amplifiers at this price point.

    So basically is you've buying lower end you'll get a Reciever ... buy higher end and you're more likely to get an Amp.

    I guess Yamaha are a little different in this respect as they make (or certainly used to make) most of their AV Amp/Recievers in two versions ... one with a tuner (the Reciever) and one without (the Amp).


    Victoria
     

Share This Page

Loading...