Pseudo Pal and component output

Discussion in 'Projectors, Screens & Video Processors' started by Jules, Aug 18, 2002.

  1. Jules

    Jules
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2000
    Messages:
    5,585
    Products Owned:
    1
    Products Wanted:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    134
    Ratings:
    +1,045
    My TV does not take a raw NTSC signal, so my DVD player (Pioneer 737) is set to send a pseudo Pal signal to it via S-video.
    My projector (Sony VPL VW11HT) receives an interlaced signal via the DVD’s component output.

    Does the Pal,Pal60,NTSC setting have any effect on the component output, and am I not getting the best image to my projector because of it being set to Pal60?

    Can anyone help?

    Thanks
    Jules
     
  2. Mr.D

    Mr.D
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2000
    Messages:
    11,167
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    133
    Ratings:
    +1,209
    Depends on the player but with regard to component output the colour frequency setting ( PAL/NTSC) will make no difference.
    With regard to the s-video signal into your TV : PAL/PAL60 is actually preferable over NTSC , there are a couple of benefits with regard to generating a PAL signal over an NTSC one.

    (This is not the same process as standards conversion where a 525/60 signal is crowbarred into a 625/50 one and is generally best avoided: However some players refer to this misleadingly as pseudopal)
     
  3. Jules

    Jules
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2000
    Messages:
    5,585
    Products Owned:
    1
    Products Wanted:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    134
    Ratings:
    +1,045
    Thanks Keith,

    Since you mention it, maybe my player doesn't do Pal60 after all.
    The switch is labled 'auto/pal/ntsc'.

    Anyway, I'm too bothered with the signal to the TV as its ok at the moment. My main concern is getting the best image possible to the projector, which from your comment it seems I'm already doing.

    Thanks again
    Jules
     
  4. Messiah

    Messiah
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2002
    Messages:
    7,616
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Ratings:
    +338
    Mr D

    Are you saying that a 525(60) signal is better than 625(50)?

    Thanks.
     
  5. Mr.D

    Mr.D
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2000
    Messages:
    11,167
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    133
    Ratings:
    +1,209
    Nope I'm saying a PAL type colour carrier is superior to an NTSC one.
     
  6. LV426

    LV426
    Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2000
    Messages:
    13,443
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Location:
    Somewhere in South Yorkshire
    Ratings:
    +5,852
    The Pioneer 737 DOES output pseudo PAL (PAL60) via composite and SVideo when the output is set to PAL.

    Also, it does NOT produce a progressive scan signal from an NTSC source via component when the output is set to PAL. It will only produce progressive when set to NTSC or Auto.

    My guess is that the Sony VW11 will produce a better image from component when driven with a Progressive Scan signal. This is certainly true of the VW10, but may not be as true of the 11 which has a better inbuilt deinterlacer/scaler than the 10.

    I can only suggest that you try it both ways. Look especially at things like scrolling end-titles (especially ones with small/fine characters) to see whether horizontal strokes in the characters flash and flicker more as they move up the screen.
     

Share This Page

Loading...
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice