1. Join Now

    AVForums.com uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

progressive scan ?

Discussion in 'Plasma TVs' started by tabs, Apr 18, 2005.

  1. tabs

    tabs
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2005
    Messages:
    1,918
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Location:
    warks
    Ratings:
    +130
    is progressive scan a "must" on a DVD player through a plasma tv ? thanks
     
  2. Jazz Monkey Jr

    Jazz Monkey Jr
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2005
    Messages:
    13,821
    Products Owned:
    2
    Products Wanted:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    137
    Location:
    Garstang, Lancs
    Ratings:
    +1,525
    I have read that it isn't, the plasma will do it for you...I think you have to spend over £500 on a DVD player to make it worth it.
     
  3. johndon

    johndon
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2002
    Messages:
    1,925
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +88
    Depends on the plasma as well - if the panel is an ALIS panel, progressive offers no improvement over non progressive (IMHO after extensive testing with a Hitachi 5300 & Arcam DV79 DVD player).

    John
     
  4. NicolasB

    NicolasB
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2002
    Messages:
    5,804
    Products Owned:
    1
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Location:
    Emily's Shop
    Ratings:
    +520
    Non-ALIS plasma screens are inherently progressive, and the original source (the recording) is inherently interlaced. So something, somewhere along the line, has to convert the interlaced signal to progressive. But all plasma devices have a deinterlacer built in (otherwise you wouldn't be able to watch Sky/Freeview/Cable on them!) So you certainly don't need a progressive scan player to use a plasma.

    However, with a good quality DVD player, it may be the case that the player's deinterlacing device is actually better quality than the one built into the screen. If so, then using that player's progressive scan output might give you a slightly better quality picture than you'd get if you fed the screen an interlaced signal.
     

Share This Page

Loading...