Munkey Boy
Distinguished Member
City got what they deserved again today. I know you shouldn't panic, but the lack of urgency sometimes disturbs me. Aguero on the bench? Missed Lescott today. And Hart wasn't to blame.
City got what they deserved again today. I know you shouldn't panic, but the lack of urgency sometimes disturbs me. Aguero on the bench? Missed Lescott today. And Hart wasn't to blame.
Hart is British.
He could make 100 mistakes a month and would get off with it.
Until he does it in the world cup , at which point he's made scape goat.
Do you STILL not know how football works in the English press?
Just recovering from yesterday's result, what a game, what a day. Best result this season for us of course and well deserved, little ol swansea doing me proud, loved celebrating the goal and doing the Poznan i think its called, shame the tv cameras didnt show that but showed a fan crying instead
A few mentions of man citys missing a few players but our best player Nathan Dyer was out also, would of loved to of seen him running at the man city defence....Survival is a step closer
Arsenal got a great opprtunity to be within a single point from spurs. Hope they can do it! Got to keep the pressure on spurs and secure top 4!
The best way to secure top 4 is not to try and aim to finish above chelsea, but to try and finish above spurs. the higher you aim the better your chances are!
About Spurs, dont u think that FA are to blame for spurs recent downfall? They have literally tapped up Harry for the england job!
Had Spurs used a similar attitude, and aimed to win the league title this year rather than try to exercise a damage limitation approach against most of the big teams in the last few weeks, I'm sure they wouldn't have run into as much trouble as they have done.
djdhrubs said:I agree that not using Aguero from the start probably sent out a negative message. But how good has Aguero actually been in the last few weeks? I haven't actually seen many City games recently, but my understanding was that he's been fading and is a bit knackered.
V Arsenal = Goal attempts 11, 5 on target.
V Man Utd = Goal attempts 18, 6 on target.
V Everton = Goal attempts 24, 5 on target.
Not quite sure how that qualifies for an 'exercise in damage limitation'.
We have approached the recent games the same way we always do. We attack.
Aguero was City's player of the month for February, as voted for by the fans.
Does adding someone to your ignore list not cover them being quoted in other people's posts?
V Arsenal = Goal attempts 11, 5 on target.
V Man Utd = Goal attempts 18, 6 on target.
V Everton = Goal attempts 24, 5 on target.
Not quite sure how that qualifies for an 'exercise in damage limitation'.
We have approached the recent games the same way we always do. We attack.
They were very defensive in the Liverpool game.
But u still lost. Arsenal have lost many many games under wenger by playing atacking football and completely dominating the opposition. doesnt mean nout. a loss is a loss mate
Sorry, you've lost me Jonney. I know we lost. Our recent performances were labelled as 'damage limitation'. I disagreed. I know all to well that wwe can batter teams for 90 minutes and get nothing. It's happened less this year, but still too many. We certainly need an RVP/Rooney/Aguero purchase this summer. The number of times we get a stiker a ball to the humber of times it ends up in the net just isn't good enough.
Agree on the Liverpool, but still can't think of any others where we haven't played our normal style. I agree we aren't at our best, but to label it a 'Damage limitation style' is way off the mark.
I thought adebayor was the answer to that for spurs?