1. Join Now

    AVForums.com uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

PLIIx or DTS:Neo6?

Discussion in 'AV Receivers & Amplifiers' started by sk4nky, Sep 7, 2004.

  1. sk4nky

    sk4nky
    Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2004
    Messages:
    138
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +1
    which is the best one to use and why? thanks.
     
  2. Vodder

    Vodder
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2004
    Messages:
    443
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    London, UK
    Ratings:
    +0
    Personal preference me thinks, they're basically do the same thing - personally I prefer Neo 6, much crisper sound!
     
  3. Ed Selley

    Ed Selley
    AVF Reviewer

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    10,849
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Ratings:
    +3,222
    PLII/IIx for me please :). Nice subtle use of the rears and can create an excellent soundstage with the right material.
     
  4. sk4nky

    sk4nky
    Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2004
    Messages:
    138
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +1
    does neo6 not use the rears at all?

    ive used PLII before with stereo movies and such with quite good (rear) effects.

    the dts bit confuses me, so i can use neo6 on any stereo source?
     
  5. Ed Selley

    Ed Selley
    AVF Reviewer

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    10,849
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Ratings:
    +3,222
    Neo 6 uses the rears- a bit too much and in an obvious way if you ask me but it uses the rears.
     
  6. Costas

    Costas
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2003
    Messages:
    1,662
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Swindon, UK
    Ratings:
    +121
    It must be a personal taste issue! I found the DTS Neo to be much crisper, clearer and equally softer with good use of the surrounds. But equally I much prefer DTS than Dolby Digital. Any film you try with DTS soundtrack available it will reveal more detail than DD. Perhaps this is why I also prefer the DTS Neo 6 against the DPLII
     
  7. pez

    pez
    Active Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    776
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Location:
    Newport
    Ratings:
    +27
    doesnt neo 6 allow for a greater frequency range to be used for the surrounds?

    pez
     
  8. Lostinapc

    Lostinapc
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    dolby prologic is taking the sound from an analog source, dolby digital takes the sound from a compressed digital source, dts takes the sound from a less/un compressed source.
    therefore dts should be best.
    the different formats (Neo, IIx) just say how many speakers are being used (6/7 in this case i think)

    I'm not sure if this is 100% accurate, don't shoot me if i'm wrong! :p
     
  9. jdanielp

    jdanielp
    Standard Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    Messages:
    176
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    21
    Location:
    Edinburgh
    Ratings:
    +2
    :thumbsdow
     
  10. sk4nky

    sk4nky
    Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2004
    Messages:
    138
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +1
    this is what im having a bit of trouble understanding, what if the source was your bog standard TV? how would Neo6/PLIIx be different if the source is still the same? or am i missing totally obvious here?
     
  11. David-Bel

    David-Bel
    Standard Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2004
    Messages:
    67
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Ratings:
    +0
    IMHO, PLII/PLIIx and Neo6 use two different algorithms in order to "matrix" a stereo (analog or digital) source into 5.1/6.1/7.1.

    Hence, I believe it enventually comes down to a matter of taste. I personnaly prefer Neo6 (Music) for music (!) because its 5.1 remix gives a surround soundfield that is not too far away from stereo. To me, Neo6 sounds more natural (although I have to say that I still prefer stereo for cd replay). Conversely, I find PLII (Music) leaning towards the "show-off" side.

    That being said, I reckon PLII (Movie) being more appropiate for movies, rather than Neo6 (Movie).

    My two cents,

    David
     
  12. David-Bel

    David-Bel
    Standard Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2004
    Messages:
    67
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Ratings:
    +0
    IMHO, PLII/PLIIx and Neo6 use two different algorithms in order to "matrix" a stereo (analog or digital) source into 5.1/6.1/7.1.

    Hence, I believe it enventually comes down to a matter of taste. I personnaly prefer Neo6 (Music) for music (!) because its 5.1 remix gives a surround soundfield that is not too far away from stereo. To me, Neo6 sounds more natural (although I have to say that I still prefer stereo for cd replay). Conversely, I find PLII (Music) leaning towards the "show-off" side.

    That being said, I reckon PLII (Movie) being more appropiate for movies, rather than Neo6 (Movie).

    My two cents,

    David
     
  13. Ed Selley

    Ed Selley
    AVF Reviewer

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2003
    Messages:
    10,849
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Ratings:
    +3,222
    I'd sooner listen to music in mono that with either of the formats in place but would second your comments about PLII being a better listen for film work. Receiver make may come into this as well given how they perform differently with the two formats in pre encoded versions as well.

    And that is 1000 posts :clap:.
     

Share This Page

Loading...