Lennyz
Established Member
Just got a copy of a well known Hifi and Homecinema magazine and they do a comparison of a number of displays.. (they don't include a Panasonic or Pioneer set btw)
The end result of this comparison is that they argue against paying high ££ for a plasma against a conventional CRT based on picture quality. They say that it is not up to standard yet in terms of sharpness and dealing with fast movement.
They do however highlight the cool factor of a plasma and the space saving aspect.
Any thoughts!!
Any plasma owners wish they had bought a crt for the picture alone?? ;-)
The end result of this comparison is that they argue against paying high ££ for a plasma against a conventional CRT based on picture quality. They say that it is not up to standard yet in terms of sharpness and dealing with fast movement.
They do however highlight the cool factor of a plasma and the space saving aspect.
Any thoughts!!
Any plasma owners wish they had bought a crt for the picture alone?? ;-)