Photography beginner.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jordan

Standard Member
Hi, I've currently got a Sony DSC-P9 (4mp) which I've had for a few years now, got it mainly to just take family pictures. It's been ok but I find it a bit small and delicate to hold, the flash is a bit too intense even on the lowest setting, there is an annoyingly long delay between pushing the button to take a picutre and the camera actually taking it, and a lot of my pictures come out blurred (perhaps I just have shakey hands!?).

I'd like start photography as a hobby and was thinking about getting a better camera at around the £400ish mark. I'm quite interested in architecture/engineering so it would be mainly for taking photos of buildings, bridges, historical sites etc from a distance, but I'd also like to use it for general family pictures too because I think I'd sell my Sony camera.

I'm getting bogged down by the reviews online so was wondering if anyone can recommend a decent camera for what I want to use it for?

Also, is it best to learn photography from trial and error or should I get some books or magazines for reference?

Jordan
 

MarkB

Active Member
Up until recently i had a Sony DSC-V3 which is superb - you can get it for about £400 online including delivery. I sold mine (for what i paid for it) to get a digital SLR, but it has plenty of manual modes as well as auto modes.
Mark
 

Jordan

Standard Member
What does an SLR camera have over a normal camera, I'm a bit clueless about all this as you can probably tell! :confused:

Jordan
 

seany

Banned
Well the biggest difference is you can add lenses, flash guns ect. Giving you much more scope. Faster to shoot with better sensors just simply beat compacts hands down. If you really want to get into photography then you should be looking at an DSLR like the 300D which you can get for about £500


But if you dont want to go down that route then with the type of photos you'll be taking i'd say the compact to go for is the Canon D70 which is wider then most compacts at 28mm and you can even add a lens (though no match for an slr)
 
C

Centurion

Guest
If you can stretch to the canon eos300d then do. but if 400 is your max then the panasonic fz20 isn't a bad choice, with the 12x optical zoom you will be able to crop in tight to those distant architectural shots you are after. There is also a wide angle lens available for this model for close proximity shots allowing you to get the whole building in frame. It also has auto modes for point and shoot but you also get creative modes for manual overide.

As for magazines and books, there are a few out there to choose from. Digital camera magazine and digital photo are very good for beginners as they have lots of tutorials and step by step guides to creating better photos.

Hope this helps a little

Gav
 

expat

Active Member
Centurion said:
As for magazines and books, there are a few out there to choose from. Digital camera magazine and digital photo are very good for beginners as they have lots of tutorials and step by step guides to creating better photos.
Are "Digital Camera" and "Digital Photo" both available online? Google delivers many results for "digital photo", none of which seem to be a magazine.

Thanks,
expat
 

owain_thomas

Active Member
definitely get the SLR, they are a different world to compact digitals. If you are interested in getting into photography as a hobby they are the best way to go. I got my nikon D70 a month or so ago and absolutely love it, it has been even better than I expected, I've learnt loads that I just never understood or got to experiment with using my old canon digital Ixus. I know several people with a 300D and they all love it.
 

seany

Banned
300D all the way. You're going to want a wide angle lens for the type of shots you like at some point, but the kit lens is 18-55mm which is wide enough but its a starter lens (quality wise) but still very good for the money . It will serve you well (as it has on my 20D) until you get a better lens
 

mjw123

Novice Member
Just to address the balance mate their seems a lot of 'snobbery' over DSLR's and I for one am still to be convinced !

I think the FZ20 is a better proposition for you.

DSLR's are expensive, heavy, need extra lenses and 90% of the time you'll get just as good results with an FZ20. The ability to use much higher ISO is a big + for the DSLR though.

We did a macro comp at work and the results were staggering.

5th Place EOS300D with no macro lens - useless result
4th Place EOS300D with Macro - good result but for the cost of everything dissapointing
3rd place Pan FZ3 - Excellent sharp result
2nd place Oly 765 - Just edged the FZ3 on detail
1st Oly Mju 410 - Unbelieve result from a £149 point and shoot in super macro

OK this is just one example but just proves a thousand pounds worth of kit doesn't always beat 150 quids worth :eek:

Rhardaker from the forum will confirm these test results if you don't believe me.
 

Johndm

Active Member
mjw123 said:
Just to address the balance mate their seems a lot of 'snobbery' over DSLR's and I for one am still to be convinced !

I think the FZ20 is a better proposition for you.

DSLR's are expensive, heavy, need extra lenses and 90% of the time you'll get just as good results with an FZ20. The ability to use much higher ISO is a big + for the DSLR though.

We did a macro comp at work and the results were staggering.

5th Place EOS300D with no macro lens - useless result
4th Place EOS300D with Macro - good result but for the cost of everything dissapointing
3rd place Pan FZ3 - Excellent sharp result
2nd place Oly 765 - Just edged the FZ3 on detail
1st Oly Mju 410 - Unbelieve result from a £149 point and shoot in super macro

OK this is just one example but just proves a thousand pounds worth of kit doesn't always beat 150 quids worth :eek:

Rhardaker from the forum will confirm these test results if you don't believe me.
Compact Camera/Beko TV/Mini HI FI/Ford Focus = Mr Average
Digital SLR/Plasma TV/AV HI Seperates/American V8 = Mr Enthusiast
 

mjw123

Novice Member
What a load of [email protected] - I take pictures every day, just because I don't have the urge to lug around a heavy DSLR doesn't mean I'm not an enthuisast

Look at the winning photo from the Feb photo of the month comp :hiya: :hiya: - yep taken on a poxy Olympus 765....probably one of the cheapest cameras that entered :clap:

You've just proved my point - 'I own a DSLR so i'm a better photagrapher than you'........snobbery.
 

Johndm

Active Member
mjw123 said:
What a load of [email protected] - I take pictures every day, just because I don't have the urge to lug around a heavy DSLR doesn't mean I'm not an enthuisast

Look at the winning photo from the Feb photo of the month comp :hiya: :hiya: - yep taken on a poxy Olympus 765....probably one of the cheapest cameras that entered :clap:

You've just proved my point - 'I own a DSLR so i'm a better photagrapher than you'........snobbery.
Everyone to their own.........if you and your compact are happy toghther, what's your problem.

No need to slang people who have higher spec equipment now is there?

If I was a 'snob' surely I'd have ordered a 350D by now.............. :hiya:
 

mjw123

Novice Member
I'm extremely happy with my £200 invesment mate that does everything (and well)

I get concerned when people ask for advice and and straight away it's get a DSLR......why ?

Yes they are very good cameras but you need all the extra's and to get the best from them you need to know what you're doing. So it's quite an outlay up front.

Look at the thread title 'Photography beginner' - is a DSLR really what a beginner needs ?

Jordan - go for the all singing all dancing FZ20 for now (approx £300) and grow into it. If you feel the camera is not giving you everything you need then try a DSLR once you've honed your technique & knowledge. I'll be surprised if you do feel the urge to move from the FZ20.
 

RobertP

Standard Member
Many years ago I started with an SLR camera and a couple of lenses. Using an SLR camera helps you understand the relationships between shutter speed and aperture, depth of field, ISO etc etc.

I then moved on to an early Kodak digital with minimal manual options. It took good pictures but was frustrating. After that I bought a Olympus 5MP c5050. That had full manual options allowing me to have similar control to my old SLR film camera. If I had never had the SLR experience I would probably not have understood what the advantage of using manual modes in certain situations would be. It was still lacking in feedback - you don't get to look through the lens and see the shot as it happens and that restricts your creativity.

My brother in law has bought various expensive compact digital cameras and has used them all on full auto because he does not understand what f stops etc mean.

The original post said about developing a photographic hobby. My suggestion would be library books on basic photograpy (not necessarily digital) and borrow or buy used off ebay a FILM SLR and shoot a few rolls of film (you can return/ sell the camera afterwards). For £25 invested in film+developing you will find out if you like what SLR gives you and learn a lot even if you decide to stay with compact cameras.

For me DSLR is a dream come true. I have a camera type that I grew up with and no developing costs + instant feedback.
 

seany

Banned
I don't think mj that you repeatedly mentioning your winning a very novice comp that's made for fun, in anyway means have a camera that really can compete in the real world with an DSLR. There’s not a photographer in the world that would agree with you mate. As I’ve said go on fred Miranda and you’ll see what they can do, and how your entry and mine and most all of ours would get ripped to shreds. They have more knowledge and skill, but they will have started out as we all did at some point.

I’m still a novice with very advanced kit, but I want to grow and as we have talked about better to have the scope if you’re really serious about it, and I am.

Your test to with the camera, was a macro lens used with the dslrs (part of owing one is the ability to use the right tools for the job) thats the strength of them

I'll say any real enthusest will move from a compact, be it 3x x12 at some point if they are serious about it.

I recommended the S70 to the lad by the way because its 28 mm and that’s better suited to the type of shots he likes..

Get the camera that’s right for you and how you think you’ll go in the future. I have idea where I want to go and I think I have the starting point to do it
 

mjw123

Novice Member
seany said:
I don't think mj that you repeatedly mentioning your winning a very novice comp that's made for fun, in anyway means have a camera that really can compete in the real world with an DSLR.
Sean i mentioned it ONCE mate to illustrate a point.

I realise DSLR are better cameras - however you have to know what your are doing to get the best from them.

The difference between good compact and DSLR's is reducing all the time - the FZ20 is a fine example of this.

My point here all along has been that for a beginner a DSLR may not be the correct choice, the better all in one compacts might be a better choice for now that's all.

It never ceases to amaze me how touchy some DSLR owners are that a crappy compact just might be able to get a good result in the right hands. I'm not just referring to this thread either as we get this arguement at work nearly every day.....
 

seany

Banned
I never pointed him in the direction of one myself. I thought that the S70 suited him well. I never meant in anyway there to have a swipe at u matey so sorry about that.

I don't think that compacts are crappy i've had two and loved them to bits. Had an ixus and then an S1 which was pretty much the same spec as the Z3. So i've worked my way up. Best way to do as you know what you like then

I'm in no way a snob about these things. I'd never say get a dslr no matter what, because it just isn't what some people want or need. I have some plans where i'd like to go so i felt that i needed an dslr. Thats not to say everybody does

Compacts are great, never thought otherwise. They are kinda like the lifestyle option in the same way a Sony dav is to a full range AV setup. People worry about size and cost ect. That should not be such in issue if you're really serious about it

My camera goes everywhere with me when i'm not working, i was with Steve and tom drunk as a skunk. I've taken about 2000 shots with it at least outside in mainly town when i've been on an all dayer



It's lenses that really are the big issue with drlsr. I've been asked to take photos of my pals Childs christening, so i'm going to go out and get a 50mm prime 1.4 great for available light and a really fast lens. Perfect for in the church

As much as i loved my S1 and it was something i really liked. Never in a million would it do for such things, and i want to get to do such things.

Compacts are great they are getting better al the time. They are not nor will they ever be up there with dslrs. That is as much to do with the lenses then the bodies

Thats what people seem to be missing
 
M

MattB1

Guest
As a beginner who wants to learn I would be inclined to go with a good compact that gives you full manual control of things like apeture, shutter speed and iso value. As mentioned previously the panasonic FZ20 is a good example of one of these cameras.

Digital SLR's are extremely good if you know what you are doing but in the hands of a beginner you will struggle to get results any better than a good compact (in most situations). Compacts such as the Fz20 also allow you to take a wide range of photo types from macro to 12X zoom without the addition of extra lenses. Of course DSLR's can do this as well but it comes at a hefty price because you'll need 3 or 4 lenses and they dont come cheap.

I know a few people with DSLR's and i'm yet to see a photo taken by these people that would convince me they are worth the money. This isn't because DSLR's are rubbish but because too many people buy them that don't have the knowledge or ablity to use them properly, and therefore they become a very expensive (and heavy) toy that you will not want to carry around with you.

Of course if you look on websites like fredmiranda there are some stunning pictures taken with DSLR's but the people that take these are experts. I'm sure given a midrange compact they could still take pictures 10 times better than any DSLR owner that enters the av forums competition (no offence intended ;-)

This is an example of some photos taken by a guy with an olympus c770 (a £275 camera). He clearly knows his camera well and his pictures are superb.

C770 pics



My advice would be to buy a good compact for £300 use it for 6 months until you know it inside out, read a few good books. If you then still want to take photography up as a serius hobby sell the compact for £200 and buy a DSLR. They will probably be at least £100 cheaper for the equivalent model now so you'll be no worse off.

Matt.
 

mjw123

Novice Member
A well balanced sensible view MattB - good post.
 

nobackwheel

Standard Member
If you really want to get into photography SLR is the way. Whether that be 35mm film first then so be it. Get a digital compact that has manual features, buy a second hand film slr - even one with just a standard 50mm lens. Then get yourself on a photography course and/or buy some photography books (not necessarily digital). I don't think you can truly know what you're doing unless you know about f-stops etc. It's easy to take a great photo - most of us have taken a few - the ability is to be able to take them time and time again (and also know where you are going wrong).

I note that the original poster brought up the shutter lag problem - I don't know about current digital compacts, but one thing is certain, you don't get that with a DSLR.

other than that - just shoot!
 
M

MattB1

Guest
Shutter lag on most newer compacts is pretty good. Some people get mixed up with focus time and shutter lag though and include the time it takes for the camera to focus as well when they complain about shutter lag. Obviously compacts are still not as fast as DSLR's though.
 

imichael

Standard Member
The Fuji f810 is around the 0.05 sec mark for shutter lag. I've just been dumb/brave and ordered the FZ20 to have a play with.

I have the Fuji and a Sigma SD9 d-SLR at the moment. the SLR is a leap forward in quality, but this is dependant on the glass used (and of course me being any good behind it). I use the compact more at social events and for 'happy snapping', so it goes pretty much everywhere. The SLR gets an outing when I don't want to compromise, but lugging it around with spare lenses and a Manfrotto 055 tripod can be heavy work.

I'm hoping the FZ20 is going to give me a compromise as it has full manual control, although a manual override on the zoom and a wider rather then longer zoom would have been ideal. I can lug it around like a compact, but then get serious if needed. If I find I use the SD9 less and less because of it, then someone will be getting a bargain.

Back to the original posters questions, using a compact on it's widest setting and will always produce a fair degree of barrel distortion, adding an adapter will make it even worse. But go for the widest quality compact available (Canon S70 last time I looked) and it'll be a great start point, and has manual overrides for the controls as you get more confident.



Ian
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

The latest video from AVForums

Podcast: Marantz SR7015 & NAD T 778 AVR + Mission LX2 MKII Speaker Reviews, AV & Film News and More

Latest News

Humax launches AURA 4K Freeview Play Recorder
  • By Andy Bassett
  • Published
Fyne Audio adds new standmounts to F1 speaker range
  • By Andy Bassett
  • Published
Mark Levinson expands 5000 Series with amplifiers and players
  • By Andy Bassett
  • Published
AVForums Podcast: 14th October 2020
  • By Phil Hinton
  • Published
Sony launches Apple TV app on XH90 TVs
  • By Andy Bassett
  • Published
Top Bottom