I get that part.
What I fail to understand is your specific point about the relevancy to the topic.
I get that part.
Interesting! Let us ruminate over this one:I presumed it was to do with your comment about linking to the articles possibly breaching copyright ?
Are you seriously suggesting that by posting a comment which is mostly copy/pasting from 3 other sources you have obtained copyright for that content and should have some control over it's use?Interesting! Let us ruminate over this one:
You are granting us with a non-exclusive, permanent, irrevocable, unlimited license to use, publish, or re-publish your Content in connection with the Service. You retain copyright over the Content.
Rules & Terms
Apparently, I retain copyright of the contents of my post. So gracious of the forum.
But the forum can do anything on the planet with it? Anything? Fair use does not apply? No permission or my consent needed?
Interesting! Let us ruminate over this one:
You are granting us with a non-exclusive, permanent, irrevocable, unlimited license to use, publish, or re-publish your Content in connection with the Service. You retain copyright over the Content.
Rules & Terms
Apparently, I retain copyright of the contents of my post. So gracious of the forum.
But the forum can do anything on the planet with it? Anything? Fair use does not apply? No permission or my consent needed?