DaveCheltenham
Established Member
Thanks for that Steve - Quite a surprise to see such a difference particularly with the same full screen 50% white pattern.
Regards
Regards
HI STEVE BOUGHT A 50VT65 AND I AM GETTING JUDDER AND BLUR ON PANNING OON BLURAY AND SKY ANY INPUT ?The VT65 hit 113 at a contrast setting of 70 and it doesn't get any brighter at 100. As for the rest of your questions, I can't answer them as the TV has gone back but I think your obsessing about trivial details, why not just demo one?
In Normal mode, which is how the TV ships, all the eco features are on. These reduce power consumption, which helps meet EU criteria but are detrimental to image quality. The Calibrated setting represents the level of energy consumption for a well setup and accurate image. The 3D setting uses the most power because you need added brightness in that mode to combat the dimming effect of the glasses.
Any idea what the difference in wattage means in terms of pounds in pocket/bills???
I highly doubt that. Why putting lots of effort in calibrating a high end display, when you ruin the PQ with the Darbee afterwards?The Radiance also has built in Darbee DVP which I prefer to 3D in the home environment. It does produce a picture that looks like you could climb into, without producing an artificial image that works better with animation than live-action pictures.
I highly doubt that. Why putting lots of effort in calibrating a high end display, when you ruin the PQ with the Darbee afterwards?
I don't fully agree with you. The Darby is a marmite product, you either love it or hate it. I hate it. That being said companies like Oppo and Lumagen would not put this sort of processing on place if it adversely had a negative effect on picture processing.
It doesn't as long as you don't over do it. Personally if it was supposed to look like the effect it creates then the director would have done it in post production.
It's a personal preference thing. Almost like someone preferring a little more or less saturation.
Where I agree with you is that indeed a properly calibrated image will simply not require it IMHO.