Panasonic TX32LXD52 Dog B******S

RyanK

Active Member
I have just set up my 52 and WOW!!!!

If you cannot decide between the 500 and the 52, save yourself £400 and go for the 52.


So far i am using the TV`s settings but the picture is WOW.

DVD Component Via PAL Progressive and NTSC Non-Progressive is outstanding.

MY 2 test discs are R1 Goldeneye Pre Titles and R2 Die Another Day Pre- Titles.

Image is spectacular, NO blurring whatsoever.

Sky+ Via RGB Scart. As you would expect not as good as above but still stunning picture.

Pace Twin Via Oxygen 75ohm Scart. Ugh as you would expect FREEVIEW lets the side down. Horrible pixilation.

Internal Freeview. Surprisingly this is quite a good picture. Much better than my external PACE Twin View FREEVIEW.

As another member has posted as soon as you plug in the TV it tunes itself automatically.

I don`t like the Auto widscreen mode. I find you have to tune to a 4:3 broadcast and select 4:3. Then when you switch to a 16:9 broadcast it changes correctly.

Also you have to maually choose Component in and again change the Aspect manually.

I hate Panasonic remote controls and Menus and they are as bad as i thought they would be. (Sony is best for remotes and menus)

On the whole this is an amazing TV. I will post my pics tomorrow.
 

sean5302

Banned
Yes.

Entirely agree.

Matsush*ta Electrical Industry Co. Ltd are currently at the very top of their game.

Where are we, precisely, in the UK?

Shocking. And a disgrace. Completely.
 

PhilipL

Member
RyanK said:
If you cannot decide between the 500 and the 52, save yourself £400 and go for the 52.
I will agree with that, it is hard to imagine the 500 being better than the 52 picture quality wise as it would take some improving on. I have seen both the 500 and 52 on in a shop but the pictures are always so terrible from their feeds that I wouldn't have bought any make or model, let alone tell apart any picture quality differences if they existed.

As I have the 52 now and the 500 is never likely to be sat aside it my living room for me to make a comparision it doesn't really matter if the 500 has an edge here or there if it is indeed different in some way, so I will never know.

So far i am using the TV`s settings but the picture is WOW.
I think you'll find it even better once you tweak the settings a bit and certainly in my opinion a huge improvement in turning of the "dynamic" (I'd like to call it the "buy me I am brighter than the other TVs in this shop") setting. :)

Pace Twin Via Oxygen 75ohm Scart. Ugh as you would expect FREEVIEW lets the side down. Horrible pixilation.

Internal Freeview. Surprisingly this is quite a good picture. Much better than my external PACE Twin View FREEVIEW.
Yes Freeview is pretty horrible due to too many channels being pushed at the expense of the quality, it is the TV equivalent of DAB.

I don`t like the Auto widscreen mode. I find you have to tune to a 4:3 broadcast and select 4:3. Then when you switch to a 16:9 broadcast it changes correctly.
This seems to be working okay for me. It seems to detect the wide screen signal and shows "Wide" briefly and I assume then doesn't apply any zooming even if the 16:9 footage is further letter boxed? On non-wide screen signals the options become 'Panasonic Auto' and then various zoom settings for manual control. The auto detects the edges and zooms in or out accordingly, although it can appear to get stuck but does eventually switch, I think this is just to stop erroneous switching.

On the whole this is an amazing TV. I will post my pics tomorrow.
Yes I agree it is very impressive, can't wait to sit down and watch a good film on it.

Regards

Phil
 

RyanK

Active Member
PhilipL said:
I will agree with that, it is hard to imagine the 500 being better than the 52 picture quality wise as it would take some improving on. I have seen both the 500 and 52 on in a shop but the pictures are always so terrible from their feeds that I wouldn't have bought any make or model, let alone tell apart any picture quality differences if they existed.

As I have the 52 now and the 500 is never likely to be sat aside it my living room for me to make a comparision it doesn't really matter if the 500 has an edge here or there if it is indeed different in some way, so I will never know.



I think you'll find it even better once you tweak the settings a bit and certainly in my opinion a huge improvement in turning of the "dynamic" (I'd like to call it the "buy me I am brighter than the other TVs in this shop") setting. :)



Yes Freeview is pretty horrible due to too many channels being pushed at the expense of the quality, it is the TV equivalent of DAB.



This seems to be working okay for me. It seems to detect the wide screen signal and shows "Wide" briefly and I assume then doesn't apply any zooming even if the 16:9 footage is further letter boxed? On non-wide screen signals the options become 'Panasonic Auto' and then various zoom settings for manual control. The auto detects the edges and zooms in or out accordingly, although it can appear to get stuck but does eventually switch, I think this is just to stop erroneous switching.



Yes I agree it is very impressive, can't wait to sit down and watch a good film on it.

Regards

Phil

Dynamic is HORRIBLE

I`m using Cinema and Cool
 

Woodywizz

Distinguished Member
Ryan,

Excellent, I'm glad you love the Panasonic :smashin:

Can't wait to see the pictures.

Cannot agree more with turning the dynamic well and truly off - I have my 500 on "normal"/"cool"/ sharpness right down with colour down slightly.

Really pleased you've got your panel after being messed about by Empire.

Matt
 

RyanK

Active Member
woodywizz said:
Ryan,

Excellent, I'm glad you love the Panasonic :smashin:

Can't wait to see the pictures.

Cannot agree more with turning the dynamic well and truly off - I have my 500 on "normal"/"cool"/ sharpness right down with colour down slightly.

Really pleased you've got your panel after being messed about by Empire.

Matt
This screen is so good, when i was watching my test disc the pre-titles of Die Another Day. When the hovercraft smashes through the bell house and seems to be coming straight at you and falls over the waterfall. I DUCKED!!!!. :oops: I couldn`t belive it, even when i watched it at the cinema i didn`t flinch :eek:
 

mjw123

Novice Member
My Pace twin on the samsung is dissapointing.....can't use on the TV tuner as I wan't the HD facilities of the pace twin. Shame these lcd's haven't got Hard Drive's on board !!
 

PhilipL

Member
Hi

Well the Panasonic isn't quite so good this morning after it woke me up at 2am :) I could hear voices and conversation coming from down stairs and wondered what was going on, as I woke up I soon guessed it was the TV so had to get up to switch it off.

Turns out in standby the TV will switch itself on if another component comes on which is daft if you are recording something as you are more than likely not there to watch it! Is there a way to stop this happening (apart from remembering to turn it off completely), can't see anything obvious in the setup menus?

Regards

Phil
 

RyanK

Active Member
i`d never leave a TV in standby overnight.

consumes too much electric plus if the TV shorts out say goodbye to your house and before you say anything i have had a TV that caught fire.
 

PhilipL

Member
Hi

Granted, but there will be a time when I or someone else forgets to flick the switch and then the set could come on, just would rather have it not responding to other equipment. The instructions talk about Q-Link being the mechanism this works by so I will try telling the TV the Q-Link device is on AV2 (which has nothing at the moment), hopefully that will do it.

Regards

Phil
 

RyanK

Active Member
DaveAnderson said:
Ryan,

the important question is....have you got over the 'wish I'd bought the 500 feeling'?

Dave

i can say with my hand on my heart YES!!!!!!


I`m glad i empire screwed up with my 500 and that i got the 52 instead. I have a cracking TV for £1109. I paid £800 for my 28" Sony Trinitron TV 5 years ago, so an extra £300 for a TV with a larger screen and HDTV ready is amazing.
 

HMHB

Distinguished Member
Does the 52 have a computer input ? I was hoping to get one that I could connect my pc to via a proper PC connection.
 

RyanK

Active Member
JohnG said:
Does the 52 have a computer input ? I was hoping to get one that I could connect my pc to via a proper PC connection.
NO pc connection. for that you need the 500.
 

RyanK

Active Member
REALDEAL said:
hi m8 any pics , does it have a vga connection, cant seem to find it when checking specs
NO VGA

it has 3 scarts(2 RGB), HDMI, Component, Audio(phono) in/out
 

REALDEAL

Novice Member
what would be the best adaptor/cable to connect this to a pc , gather i would be using the hdmi on the tv so an adaptor and cablt would be needed to connect to the dvi on the pc.
new to this so bare with me.
 

BigJohnson

Standard Member
Hi guys
Can anyone confirm what AV connectors the 52 has? Is it the same as the 500, ie component & HDMI?

Thanks
 

Funster

Standard Member
It's definitely got component and 1 x HDMI. See attachment for the rest of the details.

It really is an excellent bit of kit. If it came in a 37" I would have probably would have bought it instead of my Toshiba. If they just could have included a PC input it would be superb. The 500 with all its SD card recording and gadgets isn't worth the extra £400.

Glad you're enjoying it RyanK. :)
 

Attachments

S

SMcL

Guest
In my infinite wisdom I have been reading this forum for months and being a bit of a technophobe I took a lot of advice and plumped for the 32 inch Panny LCD about 3 weeks ago. Absolutely superb choice, so thanks - however I have 2 kids under 4 who like to play with controls. I now have "AV2" displayed on the screen permanently! How do I get this off? In the words of a famous person in distress - please help me you're my only hope...........
 

HMHB

Distinguished Member
I think it will be the "i" button on the remote control that will toggle this display on and off.
 

BigJohnson

Standard Member
Ok, almost ready to buy the panny 52. Can anyone recommend a good surround system. Looking at the Panny HT520 - seems to have had good reviews?

Thanks
 

davidac

Active Member
I was interested in getting the LXD52 but a bit concerned about the low response time. The Panasonic shop quoted 16ms, is this correct? Is there any noticable blurring?
Are Panasonic just being more honest about the refresh rate?
Has anyone managed to use the DVI (or HDMI whichever its got) with a PC or do I need to spend an extra £300 for the port with the LXD500 (Panasonic must be joking).
How good is freeview on this LCD?
 

AdieJ

Formerly 'Adrian Hughes'
I have the 26" version of this LCD, and its amazing. the quality has totally blown me away. Freeview is perfect, and I have friends who have the Samsung 26" and they even said the Panny set is so much better.

Im thinking of putting the 26" in the bedroom now, and buying a 32" for the lounge.


Ade
 

RyanK

Active Member
davidac said:
I was interested in getting the LXD52 but a bit concerned about the low response time. The Panasonic shop quoted 16ms, is this correct? Is there any noticable blurring?
Are Panasonic just being more honest about the refresh rate?
Has anyone managed to use the DVI (or HDMI whichever its got) with a PC or do I need to spend an extra £300 for the port with the LXD500 (Panasonic must be joking).
How good is freeview on this LCD?

it has a 14ms response time, and believe me there is NO blurring.
 

Similar threads

The latest video from AVForums

Podcast: Home AV, TV, Tech News & Reviews, Plus The Best of July 2020

Trending threads

Latest News

Has Amazon Prime Video dropped Dolby Atmos?
  • By Andy Bassett
  • Published
JBL launches 4349 Studio Monitor
  • By Andy Bassett
  • Published
LG Display next generation OLEDs showcased at SID 2020
  • By Andy Bassett
  • Published
AVForums Podcast: 2nd August 2020
  • By Phil Hinton
  • Published
Top Bottom