Hello, OK, you've guessed it, it's another which one is best post, but please read on... I've been doing extensive research on the 32" LCDs available at the moment and have narrowed it down to two models. I know the differences between the two and as far as I can see the Panasonic comes out on top in terms of features (components, Freeview, etc). Though what I'm really interested in is picture quality. Is there really £500 difference in PQ between the two (£1575 Pana, £2075 Philips). OK, so the Philips has PixelPlus2, HD compatability, DVI and Ambilights, but does that make it a much better screen than the Panasonic? I have seen both of them playing, not very well set-up with mediocre aerial feeds. They weren't side by side so I couldn't make a direct comparison, but they both looked pretty good to me. I'm not a Sky user so I'm not that interested in HQ compatability. I want my choice in my living room by Christmas so please help me out. Do you have either model? What do you think of them? Have you looked at the same two screens and come to any conclusions? All opinions greatly appreciated. Tony.