JustTheFacts
Established Member
Arguments For How Prevalent is OLED Burn In
Unopinionated, the professional TV reviewers, rtings.com, Consumer Reports, and any other member with views similar to his are incompetent with respect to OLED Burn In.
Professional TV reviewers are incompetent and Consumer Reports Scientific Statistical Data is invalid when it comes to OLED Burn In.
Some of what rtings.com says about burn in is good, but their overall stance on burn in is incorrect. "Although we don't expect most people who watch varied content to have any issues, OLED TVs, such as the LG OLED C9 do have the possibility of experiencing burn in. "
Because I have experienced OLED Burn In it can't be a rare occurrence.
Because I have experienced OLED Burn In it is pandemic and everybody will get OLED Burn In sooner or later.
There are to many cases on you tube and social media for OLED Burn In to not be a pandemic problem.
I know a lot about pixels and TV technology and I say OLED Burn In is a problem.
If OLED Burn In wasn't a problem then LG would provide a 10 year warranty like Samsung does for their LCDs.
The professional TV Reviewers opinions can't be trusted. They are in on a big conspiracy with LG to minimize the OLED Burn In issue, since they have to suck up to LG in order to get special privileges at CES.
Gadgetobsessed AVForums poll shows burn in is at 35 percent for certain years.
Curry's and all of the other stores that sell TVs are in on a big conspiracy. They know that a huge number of their TVs are returned for OLED Burn In and they don't report it to the general public.
LG knows that their OLED panels are prone to burn in and they are conning all the other TV manufacturers to use their panels and manufacturer OLED TVs.
Sure would help if LG was more upfront about OLED Burn In.
The most reliable source of information on OLED Burn In is obtained from people on social media that have actually experienced OLED Burn In.
Unopinionated, the professional TV reviewers, rtings.com, Consumer Reports, and any other member with views similar to his are incompetent with respect to OLED Burn In.
Professional TV reviewers are incompetent and Consumer Reports Scientific Statistical Data is invalid when it comes to OLED Burn In.
Some of what rtings.com says about burn in is good, but their overall stance on burn in is incorrect. "Although we don't expect most people who watch varied content to have any issues, OLED TVs, such as the LG OLED C9 do have the possibility of experiencing burn in. "
Because I have experienced OLED Burn In it can't be a rare occurrence.
Because I have experienced OLED Burn In it is pandemic and everybody will get OLED Burn In sooner or later.
There are to many cases on you tube and social media for OLED Burn In to not be a pandemic problem.
I know a lot about pixels and TV technology and I say OLED Burn In is a problem.
If OLED Burn In wasn't a problem then LG would provide a 10 year warranty like Samsung does for their LCDs.
The professional TV Reviewers opinions can't be trusted. They are in on a big conspiracy with LG to minimize the OLED Burn In issue, since they have to suck up to LG in order to get special privileges at CES.
Gadgetobsessed AVForums poll shows burn in is at 35 percent for certain years.
Curry's and all of the other stores that sell TVs are in on a big conspiracy. They know that a huge number of their TVs are returned for OLED Burn In and they don't report it to the general public.
LG knows that their OLED panels are prone to burn in and they are conning all the other TV manufacturers to use their panels and manufacturer OLED TVs.
Sure would help if LG was more upfront about OLED Burn In.
The most reliable source of information on OLED Burn In is obtained from people on social media that have actually experienced OLED Burn In.
Last edited: