It's says' X1 Processor: Is that 'Extreme' or 'Ultimate' type?.
More suitable for Gaming than getting most of out of viewing of Movies or TVs series, as it lacks either of X1 powerful processors to bring out the best of normal content.
Why would someone buy this over an LG C9 at the same price?
For instance, I have to use it as main PC monitor (work, gaming and movies) and I'm terrified by burn-in.Why would someone buy this over an LG C9 at the same price?
Pixel degradation over time/usage.Why would someone buy this over an LG C9 at the same price?
In my opinion, Sony absolutely has to clarify two points:
1) How many HDMI 2.1 inputs (40 or 48 gbps) has this TV?
2) When 4k 120 firmware update will be available?
Does worry me when manufacturers say "yeah yeah don't worry we'll release it sometime in the future"
Though £1499 for a 65" isn't a bad price
Also slower pixels + usable motion interpolation = much less stuttering.I suppose it depends on if you reckon your viewing habits have a chance of screen burn issues with an oled and you want to stick with an lcd.
Why would someone buy this over an LG C9 at the same price?
For not having to worry about direct sunlight hitting the screen for hours a day. Sure the Mrs would be overjoyed at me saying we have to go home because you didn't draw the curtains this morning....
Yeah I wouldn't use an oled as a monitor but everything else is fineFor instance, I have to use it as main PC monitor (work, gaming and movies) and I'm terrified by burn-in.
Never heard of this as an OLED issue. Keen to know moreSorry what does this mean? Is there an issue with oleds and direct sunlight?
Unless you have a static image on for hours every day the risk is low on the newer OLEDs.I suppose it depends on if you reckon your viewing habits have a chance of screen burn issues with an oled and you want to stick with an lcd.
I don't think motion handling is that far off LCD these days.Also slower pixels + usable motion interpolation = much less stuttering.
Unless you have a static image on for hours every day the risk is low on the newer OLEDs.
Sorry what does this mean? Is there an issue with oleds and direct sunlight?
Yes, I discovered this doing research for a new TV. The general opinion seems to be not to place an oled where direct sunlight can hit the screen. If in a situation like mine where the TV will be facing a wall of windows behind the sofa, oleds are not advised. You will always get the replies of "rearrange the room" or "draw the curtains" that unless living in a bachelor pad is not normally viable. There was a recent pic in C9/CX thread I think where most looked at it and said sunlight from gap in curtains. I'm not a oled doom monger or LCD fanboy. I really want an oled but don't think it's suited for our set up. Just have a Google of Oled and direct sunlight and see what you find.
If the companies were willing to honour any issues by stating burn in was a warranty issue yes.Unless you have a static image on for hours every day the risk is low on the newer OLEDs.
Not only that. My wife's hearing is deteriorating, so we have subtitles on pretty much all of the time. My LG 65 C6 now looks horrible, any redish background shows all the 'pockmarks' of where the subtitles normally appear. No OLED for me any more.Unless you have a static image on for hours every day the risk is low on the newer OLEDs.