Finally someone unbiased. QD OLED is simply better, it fixes almost all the weaknesses of OLED. More brightness, no tinting on whites, almost no banding, better near black performance, no more green tint when viewing the TV under an angle... it's simply better and no brand will stand a chance competing with WOLED against QD OLED. There is a reason why Sony placed the A95K at the top of their TV line because QD OLED is the best technology.
Of course the QD OLED tech is better but people are acting as if it’s a magic bullet for brand level problems when clearly that’s not the case . The S95B is doing a usual Samsung mistake (though a promised firmware update is coming) while the A95K is doing a usual Sony mistake.
A piece tech is only as good as comapnies utilise it’s potential .
The fact that Samsung display have already got yields to improve is hopefully just one of the many and soon lessons QD OLED will “learn” from WRGBOLED. We’re getting a Damn good price in the first year and we could potneitally have most mainstream sizes covered by the third year of QD OLED . That and manufacturers so far haven’t fully capitalised on QD OLED to fix their usual mistakes (until the Samsung update is out at least ).
Till then WRGB OLED is a contender , not because of the technology but the maturity that comes with experience .
QD OLED is of to a flying start . No point of being a fanboy and acting like it’s impossible for that pace to be ruined and no point being a denier and saying QD OLED isn’t going to be a viable contender any time soon .
Either way things are getting exciting before micro led and true QLED is even close to hitting the shelf . Hopefully as consumers we’re all gonna benefit from that alone