NEWS: Samsung HW-Q950A soundbar adds room calibration for 2021

davejones2

Well-known Member
I find it absolutely outrageous that Samsung has managed to get away with 4 generations of a >£1500 atmos soundbar without even basic room calibration. It was just about forgivable on the k950 given that it was pretty much the first atmos product of it's type, but since then they absolutely, 100% should have introduced something.

Reading between the lines it doesn't seem like they have even implemented what the system actually needs (basic calibration of the levels of the different channels to a mic in the listener's position; even a simple set of test tones would have been sufficient) and instead it's going to be a some sort of auto EQ, given that the mic being utilised is on the TV set itself. Subwoofer management might be of some benefit, but that is very easily adjusted manually regardless.

To add to the insult Samsung are only making it available to consumers with one of their new TV's! That is an incredibly cynical move and an absolute facepalm to any of the other 1000s of consumers who happen to have a different model / brand and have just spent >£1500 on a soundbar.

I really think that the reviewers of these products need to take on some responsibility for holding Samsung to account on this. As long as the likes of Steve Withers, who produce multiple reviews of the same product across much of the popular tech press, are giving recommended badges and 9/10 scores they are just not going to bother. Dolby Atmos test discs are not even available through normal retail channels so what exactly is the point of reviewing the soundbar using one when it's not in any way representative of the average consumers experience?

It's a tiny extra cost for them to implement that would make an absolutely vast difference to the products sound quality.

Perhaps if Samsung finally get deservedly slated for this sort of decision-making on their premium products they would stop taking the pee.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Tegs200

Active Member
I find it absolutely outrageous that Samsung has managed to get away with 4 generations of a >£1500 atmos soundbar without even basic room calibration. It was just about forgivable on the k950 given that it was pretty much the first atmos product of it's type, but since then they absolutely, 100% should have introduced something.

Reading between the lines it doesn't seem like they have even implemented what the system actually needs (basic calibration of the levels of the different channels to a mic in the listener's position; even a simple set of test tones would have been sufficient) and instead it's going to be a some sort of auto EQ, given that the mic being utilised is on the TV set itself. Subwoofer management might be of some benefit, but that is very easily adjusted manually regardless.

To add to the insult Samsung are only making it available to consumers with one of their new TV's! That is an incredibly cynical move and an absolute facepalm to any of the other 1000s of consumers who happen to have a different model / brand and have just spent >£1500 on a soundbar.

I really think that the reviewers of these products need to take on some responsibility for holding Samsung to account on this. As long as the likes of Steve Withers, who produce multiple reviews of the same product across much of the popular tech press, are giving recommended badges and 9/10 scores they are just not going to bother. Dolby Atmos test discs are not even available through normal retail channels so what exactly is the point of reviewing the soundbar using one when it's not in any way representative of the average consumers experience?

It's a tiny extra cost for them to implement that would make an absolutely vast difference to the products sound quality.

Perhaps if Samsung finally get deservedly slated for this sort of decision-making on their premium products they would stop taking the pee.

Could not agree more .
 
Last edited by a moderator:

sc1lcq

Active Member
I know realistically having calibration is a good thing but with the q950 I haven’t missed it. With previous soundbars and set ups I’ve found it hinders the quality rather than improves it but appreciate I might have had some bad luck. But it was stressful nonetheless and I welcomed just going with how it sounds out the box!
 

The latest video from AVForums

Podcast: Q Acoustics Q3030i, Humax Aura, Roku Streambar & WandaVision Reviews and more...
Top Bottom