Whether HDR10+ succeeds will depend on how much support it gets from streaming services and the studios. Although you don't need a full HDMI 2.1 connection to deliver dynamic metadata, it will depend on how much headroom the manufacturer included when choosing their HDMI 2.0 chipsets, Samsung were obviously planning for HDR10+ with some of their 2016 TVs.Thank you Steve
Million dollar questions: what are the chances of this format taking over hdr10 completely ? When ?
Secondly, it looks like no need for hdmi 2.1 for this new HDR standard.
Whether HDR10+ succeeds will depend on how much support it gets from streaming services and the studios. Although you don't need a full HDMI 2.1 connection to deliver dynamic metadata, it will depend on how much headroom the manufacturer included when choosing their HDMI 2.0 chipsets, Samsung were obviously planning for HDR10+ with some of their 2016 TVs.
HDR10+ isn't currently part of the UHD Blu-ray specs but if it was added I suspect you're right, it would sit on top of the HDR10 base layer.Is it going to be a streaming HDR solution only or will it also be used for future UHD disc releases? If it's going to be used on UHD discs then I imagine it will have to sit on top of the base HDR10 layer. Similar to the way Dolby Vision encoded UHD discs will have to be.
I guess it depends on how 'heavy' the metadata actually is. Dolby uses an enhancement layer, yes, but it's not just for their special sauce dynamic information as it also includes a 1920x1080 signal which one assumes carries some sort of goodness which contains the extra information needed to rebuild the 12-bit output.HDR10+ isn't currently part of the UHD Blu-ray specs but if it was added I suspect you're right, it would sit on top of the HDR10 base layer.
Hiya, I have a 2017 Samsung Q7F and Amazon Prime how do i tell if running HDR10+?