Why do you think this is massively disappointing?
Panasonic make create OLEDs with great picture quality - more of the same same is most welcome!
And they are adding the HDMi 2.1 features that games want for 120 Hz etc.
I imagine 77" would be too prohibitively expensive - I'm sure they've crunched the numbers and decided the market is too small to warrant the investment necessary.
Personally, I'm not interested in any of the auto-adaptive TV modes - but I'm sure more mainstream consumers may appreciate it.
Regards,
James.
It’s disappointing because as a technology provider, I am looking for manufacturers to push the boundaries, come up with new ideas, fix issues that were apparent in previous models etc. They need to do that to justify why a consumer would:
a. Pay a premium price higher than other brands
b. Why choose them in general v others or LCD etc
Their PQ is great, I’m a big Panasonic fan other than their QA which my experience was quite frankly awful. But one of their differentiators was brightness which looking at the flagship Sony, may be not a differentiator anymore.
Their OS is rubbish and while the purists may say this doesn’t matter, the purists make up a tiny % of the overall market. Panasonic mention in their marketing bilge that they want to widen their customer base - well aside from HDMI 2.1, Sony and LG offer a fantastic OS with full suite of internal apps and this was an opportunity for Panasonic to at least get on a level playing field. It does matter to many people who don’t want lots of external boxes, wires and remotes.
You mention 77” being too expensive, but Sony and LG are not only offering 77” but also 83” - again disappointing regardless of what their internal reasons are.
So those are the reasons I am disappointed.