NEWS: 4K TV content struggles to find audience

Discussion in 'General TV Discussions Forum' started by Phil Hinton, May 11, 2019.


    1. Andy Bassett

      Andy Bassett
      Standard Member Staff Member

      Joined:
      Aug 7, 2017
      Messages:
      214
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      46
      Location:
      Sheffield, UK
      Ratings:
      +100
    2. 1080 jawbreaker

      1080 jawbreaker
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Nov 30, 2004
      Messages:
      3,285
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      136
      Ratings:
      +899
      I was watching Our Planet on Netflix in HD, my eyes though it was 4k it looked pristine. Quality 4k down scaled to 1080p can look stunning but then you get Football in HD on the BBC which has been put through the ringer destroying detail and looks a mess compared to quality 4k Footy. I would be happy with quality HD but these days its not possible, well not when the broadcaster has to filter the sh#t out of it and shoe horn it into an abysmally low bitrate allocation. I guess the majority get used to the crap and just live with it.
       
      • Agree Agree x 3
      • Like Like x 1
      • List
    3. Bruggelink

      Bruggelink
      Standard Member

      Joined:
      Nov 9, 2015
      Messages:
      42
      Products Owned:
      1
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      11
      Location:
      Brugge, Belgium
      Ratings:
      +12
      Audience struggles to find 4K TV content.
      Where is the rest of Game of Thrones in 4K ? And garbage in 4K remains garbage. 4K blu ray being unrealisticly expensive, often 3 times the price of the blu ray. Now they are trying to sell 8k TVs... how long before such content is available. 1 UHD channel on my Belgian tv distribution (and only rubbish)
       
    4. MahaRaja

      MahaRaja
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Oct 24, 2005
      Messages:
      1,245
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      1
      Trophy Points:
      87
      Location:
      London
      Ratings:
      +447
      Lack of 4K content is the reason as pointed out, TV companies wants customers to upgrade to 4K sets, but watch HD & SD content mostly and if u don’t like or want crap Netflix & Amazon TV shows or don’t want Sky football, then it’s all HD.

      BBC, ITV C4 have no regular 4K content, with BBC showing 4K in Iplayer, once in a blue moon!
       
      • Like Like x 4
      • Agree Agree x 2
      • List
    5. xxGBHxx

      xxGBHxx
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Nov 24, 2015
      Messages:
      639
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      96
      Location:
      United Kingdom
      Ratings:
      +770
      A better title may be "Audiences struggling to find 4k content" because I know on my 4k TV I often have to actively look for 4k feeds for programs I know are in 4k because it doesn't tell me otherwise.

      The promotion of streaming 4k is terrible in general and you also need to factor in the staggering bandwidth requirements that mean it automatically rules out vast swathes of people, especially in the US where Internet access is generally terrible (both speed and cost).

      The Quote is right about them forgetting 8k as the streaming infrastructure is probably 5 years or more off for that.

      G
       
    6. gilesypopper

      gilesypopper
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Oct 29, 2008
      Messages:
      238
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      18
      Ratings:
      +11
      Interesting how tv manufacturers are now starting to roll out 8k but 4k has barely taken off after 3-5 years
       
    7. MahaRaja

      MahaRaja
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Oct 24, 2005
      Messages:
      1,245
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      1
      Trophy Points:
      87
      Location:
      London
      Ratings:
      +447
      It’s a business of buying useless TVs and fools are vulnerable into upgrading.
       
    8. Noblestone

      Noblestone
      Novice Member

      Joined:
      Oct 9, 2018
      Messages:
      15
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      4
      Location:
      Kent
      Ratings:
      +2
      All a bit odd really.

      You couldn't get game of thrones in 4k in the UK. In fact a lot of people got it in 720p via Now TV, me included.

      There is no price premium in buying 4k as its pretty much all you can buy 43" and above, so your getting it, but barely an upgrade in PQ over HD for most people, most of the time.
       
    9. gilesypopper

      gilesypopper
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Oct 29, 2008
      Messages:
      238
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      18
      Ratings:
      +11
      Yeah, I was in currys the other day and the guy i was speaking with was helpful - telling me about nanocell technology - this would mean absolutely nothing to 90% of consumers (myself included if I didn't read avforums! :)) but they fall for it because it sounds good and probably end up buying OTT TVs for their needs.

      Honestly i reckon most (not all) people would be happy with a £500 TV - HD or 4K - for the next 3 years or so.
       
    10. NicolasB

      NicolasB
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Oct 3, 2002
      Messages:
      6,686
      Products Owned:
      1
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      137
      Location:
      Emily's Shop
      Ratings:
      +1,066
      It could also be because there actually aren't any image quality gains between a high-quality 1080p source and a 4K SDR source - or rather, at typical screen sizes and viewing distances, the human eye isn't sensitive enough to detect them.

      But that won't stop manufacturers from marketing 8K, or people from buying it, because obviously 8 must be better than 4. :(
       
    11. Abacus

      Abacus
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Jan 19, 2015
      Messages:
      730
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      67
      Location:
      Torbay
      Ratings:
      +470
      Nothing to do with content, all manufactures in all industry’s move forward over time with new equipment, which while initially expensive soon drops so that it cost no more (And sometimes less) to make than previous generation products, thus previous generation products become unviable to manufacture.

      Early HD sets are coming to the end of their lives (They just don’t provide or work properly with the modern tech that people are now used to) so an auto upgrade takes place, which means that as there are no HD sets at the most common sizes (55 & 65 are the most common these days) 4K sets becomes the norm. (The same will apply to 8K and beyond)

      Bill
       
    12. xxGBHxx

      xxGBHxx
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Nov 24, 2015
      Messages:
      639
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      96
      Location:
      United Kingdom
      Ratings:
      +770
      FTFY

      G
       
    13. Hixs

      Hixs
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Jul 24, 2015
      Messages:
      3,348
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      136
      Location:
      France
      Ratings:
      +1,995
      I'm still rocking 1080p. I actually went from a 4k LCD to a 1080p OLED. Most of our content is streamed and it's very rarely above 720p due to slow internet, so 4k just didn't make sense given it's poor upscaling. Yeah there is 4k discs, but the GF refuses to rewatch anything, so spending 25-30 for a single watch is a huge waste of money.
       
    14. Roohster

      Roohster
      Distinguished Member

      Joined:
      Jul 1, 2004
      Messages:
      4,606
      Products Owned:
      7
      Products Wanted:
      1
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Location:
      Derbyshire
      Ratings:
      +5,508
      Ignorance and indifference are big factors - loads of people buy 4K TVs because they're the latest thing (and more readily available these days)... then continue to watch SD channels because they appear first in the program planner of most broadcasters.

      Every time I used to visit my parents they'd be watching BBC/CH4/ITV etc. in SD despite having an HD TV.
       
      • Like Like x 2
      • Agree Agree x 1
      • List
    15. jwsg

      jwsg
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Dec 13, 2002
      Messages:
      566
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      43
      Ratings:
      +216
      My previous HD LCD cost a fair bit less than my last CRT TV and a 4K TV needn't have cost much more except I went for OLED. HD Freeview looks pretty good on the OLED and even SD is watchable so if thats what people want to watch and enjoy on their 4K TV then let them.

      But its hardly a well hidden secret that you can get a 4K Sky or VM box or a 4K Netflix plan. On Itunes many HD films will play in 4K only requiring that you know to buy a ATV box. On sale you buy Itunes 4K films for £2+ so there's no need to buy £20+ UHD disks to get 4K content. On the other hand BBC 4K output is virtually non existent considering the £150 annual fee.
       
    16. smackos

      smackos
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Jan 8, 2007
      Messages:
      1,655
      Products Owned:
      3
      Products Wanted:
      4
      Trophy Points:
      116
      Ratings:
      +699
      It doesn't help when in an age where people are looking at being more thrifty with their money, that services offering 4K will mean an upgrade to people's outgoings too. If we are talking about a general take up of UHD, then the general public will in no way pay circa £24 for a new release. It also doesn't help when you have the likes of Now TV putting out an absolutely dross service. As an aside you only have to look at Sky's lack of HDR content to see another problem. They've marketed the heck out of Sky Q's Ultra HD service, yet not offered the main component that actually does improve picture quality. No wonder people are apathetic over 4K when the largest UK Pay TV service either offers a poor 720p for the low income masses, or subpar 4K for the niche.

      Also, it's actually worthwhile noting that there's a good portion of us even on this forum that know full well a decent 1080p source still can look stunning, so we can hardly bemoan the less than picky general public for not bothering with 4K.
       
      • Agree Agree x 3
      • Like Like x 1
      • List
    17. Sandyb01

      Sandyb01
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Jul 23, 2018
      Messages:
      161
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      43
      Location:
      London
      Ratings:
      +124
      Most people I know are still using their 1080P sets from 5-7 years ago, which are still going strong. They all have plenty of money too, but just aren't bothered by 4K, and wouldn't have an idea what HDR is, nor that it is the bigger PQ improvement.

      And I have a bit of sympathy with that view. I tend to like to have the best of the best, but a Blu-ray on my 65inch high end plasma is still so gorgeous, I'll happily keep the 3-4k in my pocket required to update.
       
      • Like Like x 1
      • Agree Agree x 1
      • List
    18. Evinger

      Evinger
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Jan 28, 2017
      Messages:
      593
      Products Owned:
      18
      Products Wanted:
      1
      Trophy Points:
      66
      Location:
      Eving, Germany
      Ratings:
      +497
      Our 4K TV is generally used for 4K Disks, Apple TV, & a few series on Amazon Prime. Except for some American Football, we don't watch "regular" TV channels. Its upscaling is very good, so regular Blu Rays look great as well - often I only upgrade to the 4K Disk for better sound (Atmos, or a redo of the original Blu Ray recording), otherwise we stay with the Blu Ray.
      I can see 8K mostly appealing to people who can fit big TV's in their viewing Room, but our 55" is about as big as we could fit in our TV Alcove (Maybe a 65" at a pinch). Along with the price and the limited Market I agree that 8K is going to be very niche for a very long time.
       
    19. scrowe

      scrowe
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Jan 8, 2005
      Messages:
      1,570
      Products Owned:
      1
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      116
      Location:
      Brighton
      Ratings:
      +1,026
      If a survey was made on UK habits, I'm sure it wouldn't be an issue of indifference, instead appalling software and delivery combined with below par broadband and wireless capability.

      I don't have experience of Virgin but nothing at all on SkyQ is delivered as broadcast TV. For football you need to watch the live HD feed and enter a combination of remote button presses to switch to UHD, and you can't setup the box to automatically record the UHD feed. For shows that you season pass, you have to record the HD version, and wait at least 30 minutes and then browse or search fir the On-Demand UHD version and download it. Even the default download UHD is buggy often making you check for UHD over HD when you select the download.

      For Amazon they have a single membership level that gives you UHD/4K fir free but they don't easily highlight the option in the App and the UHD version must be searched and selected separately from the standard version. Why on earth its so hard to unify the show and just offer the option on playback will never know.

      Netflix at least dies unify the search/browse by the show and offers you the best version on playback detected by the App on startup. But you only get UHD if you a) have a modern app iteration on your smart playback device b) have detected suitable Internet bandwidth and c) pay for the highest tier even if you don't need the multiple device playback bundled in.

      And don't let's ignore the whole inconsistency on any number of options such as 4k/HDR/HDR+/Dolby Vision/Stereo/DD/DD+/Atmos across the device app implementations, or the limitations of 4K TVs on HDMI 4k/50/4:4:4 output or sound format pass thru via ARC, etc from inbuilt apps.
       
      • Agree Agree x 3
      • Like Like x 1
      • List
    20. Sandyb01

      Sandyb01
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Jul 23, 2018
      Messages:
      161
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      43
      Location:
      London
      Ratings:
      +124
      Not sure about that - yes you've accurately showed why the user experience is messy and broken, but we're also far from content being widely available in 4k, let alone HDR.

      There are niche things that get discussed on this forum, and UHD is not quite as niche as some fo those things, not suggesting that. But most people are happy enough with HD. Of course if you ask them an open ended question like "do you want to be able to watch everything in the highest possible quality, such as UHD", they'll say yes.

      But that's not illustrative of the broader publics actual habits. I'm sure they are generally aware of 4K, know that he next big TV they get will likely be 4k, but beyond that couldn't tell you much more.
       
    21. martin 39

      martin 39
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Aug 20, 2009
      Messages:
      633
      Products Owned:
      1
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      31
      Ratings:
      +83
      I thought I had nigh on stopped buying discs as having so many that never get watched . But after buying a oled and 4k player I'm back buying discs again . I never pay more than £12 I tend to buy 2nd hand or wait for deals . The quality of HDR 4k just blows me away . More than happy with Netflix and Amazon just wish Amazon was easier . Next is weather it's worth going Atmos but that means more speakers and changing the amp . My amp cost more than the TV a few year's back and really can't justify the cost so stuck with plain old hd master audio . After watching Dunkirk I think I am more than happy it sounded amazing . People in general just couldn't care about 4 k i believe and have a amp and speakers
       
      • Like Like x 1
      • Thanks Thanks x 1
      • List
    22. JH4

      JH4
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      May 6, 2003
      Messages:
      2,467
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      83
      Ratings:
      +299
      The best 4K material is on YouTube..
       
    23. Doctor Smith

      Doctor Smith
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Apr 3, 2007
      Messages:
      2,500
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      106
      Location:
      Loughborough
      Ratings:
      +270
      Netflix 4k content is a bit of a letdown. Don't have sky q but I expect its no different. The only 4k content which has blown me away is 4k blu ray
       
    24. Zigourney

      Zigourney
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Nov 26, 2006
      Messages:
      657
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      66
      Location:
      Birmingham
      Ratings:
      +338
      good luck with those 8K tv sets suckers...... :laugh:
       
    25. AudioWave

      AudioWave
      Standard Member

      Joined:
      Mar 31, 2019
      Messages:
      33
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      11
      Location:
      England
      Ratings:
      +15
      I think the best innovation we have had in terms of picture quality for televisions in the last 2.5 years has to be OLED regardless weather its 4k or 1080p its something which is noticeable the only downside is its still to expensive for the average Joe hence why I'm still sitting on my 1080p TV till the price starts to come down further.
       
      • Like Like x 1
      • Agree Agree x 1
      • Love Love x 1
      • List
    26. Jason72

      Jason72
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Jan 13, 2015
      Messages:
      427
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      28
      Location:
      London
      Ratings:
      +83
      Have to agree with AudioWave's previous comment about Oled TV's. The improvement over my previous Panasonic plasma is substantial. I never expected the colours to be so much more vivid (even in SD).
      The downside for me is that I bought an LGE6V 65" From this Forum, and I'll walk into the lounge and the wife will be watching her soaps in SD !! When we watch a movie, she'd be just as happy listening through the TV speakers.
      It's a fact of life, some people just aren't bothered.
       
      • Like Like x 1
      • Funny Funny x 1
      • List
    27. martin 39

      martin 39
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Aug 20, 2009
      Messages:
      633
      Products Owned:
      1
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      31
      Ratings:
      +83
      Exactly the same here . This is why I want to cancel sky once game of thrones is finished . No one watches it all Freeview tv being watched in SD it's lucky itv is straight hd as no one would bother looking for hd let alone 4k.this frees up money for my films .
       
    28. T1berious

      T1berious
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Feb 1, 2006
      Messages:
      161
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      31
      Location:
      Birmingham
      Ratings:
      +44
      No idea how they are going to market 8k with zero content but back on topic, here we are X years later and 4k content is something you have to search out or pay for (either streaming services or 4k media). Fortunately or unfortunately depending on your point of view, I'm a bit daft and can't help myself so subscribe to both Netflix and Amazon (already a prime member so no big deal) but point blank refuse to have Sky and buy UHD disks as the movies i want to re watch come out. 5.1 is fine for me as more speakers just isn't an option.

      As a friend of mine once said on the early days of the HD \ UHD debate "content is king"
       
    29. steviedr

      steviedr
      Distinguished Member

      Joined:
      May 23, 2006
      Messages:
      6,016
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Ratings:
      +4,218
      Agree with many here.
      Can’t afford Sky Q, discs are too expensive (although the P&AQ are fantastic on them), so purchase second hand. Those films I want to see in higher res, but won’t watch multiple times I purchase on ATV for a few pounds.
      Netflix cater for 4K tv shows, but not much in the film department.
      Amazon is a joke, they have again 4K tv content and make it impossible to find, search’s don’t even work half the time.
      I will always seek the 4K feed, but with many don’t want to have the hassle looking for the cheapest deals for the uptick in res.
      Nowtv, very cheap and it looks just about ok on a 4K set, can’t even get Sky to upgrade to 1080P never mind 4K...
       
    30. oldfart

      oldfart
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Jul 15, 2015
      Messages:
      86
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      8
      Location:
      Bletchley
      Ratings:
      +21
      The vast majority of my family are indifferent to 4K technology and are just happy to watch content in any format.

      I totally get the 4K experience but think 4K discs are way to expensive so now only buy BD and to be honest the difference in quality is minimal.

      Go to Currys for example and what a lot of people don't realise is most of the TV's are connected to sound bars and sound great. After purchasing and setting up at home are then disappointed with the crappy internal speakers, Then have to fork out another £200 or so for a sound bar so they can hear dialogue clearly.

      One thing that does annoy me is there is just not enough HDMI sockets on 4K TV's. My previous Sony HD had 4 sockets but the Panasonic 4K replacement only has 3. Consequently unless you phaff about with HDMI extension sockets something has to give and with me it was ATV.

      Do not get me started on mainstream television picture quality as it sucks.
       

    Share This Page

    Loading...