1. Join Now

    AVForums.com uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

New Planet Is Earth's Twin 200 Light Years Away

Discussion in 'General Chat' started by p1tse, Jan 6, 2014.

  1. p1tse

    p1tse Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,857
    User Reviews:
    0
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    68
    Ratings:
    +72
    It's amazing us humans can calculate such things being so far away. What are your views?

     
  2. Bill Hicks

    Bill Hicks Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2004
    Messages:
    7,108
    User Reviews:
    0
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Location:
    London, England.
    Ratings:
    +1,627
    Wonder if they have Tesco's as well? :rolleyes:
     
  3. DPinBucks

    DPinBucks Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2008
    Messages:
    5,682
    User Reviews:
    0
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Location:
    Burnham, Bucks
    Ratings:
    +1,304
    What kind of views are you looking for?

    In what sense do they consider it Earth's 'twin'? At the same weight (they mean mass) but 60% larger, it would have a surface gravity of 3/4 g. That's midway between rocky and gas-giant. It would have huge implications for its atmosphere and climate. It would not be Earth-like.
     
  4. The Glimmer Man

    The Glimmer Man Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2013
    Messages:
    104
    User Reviews:
    0
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    West Norfolk, England
    Ratings:
    +40
    The Andromeda Galaxy is roughly the same size as our galaxy, The Milky Way, and is 2.5 million light years from Earth. You can see its sun in the night sky with the naked eye. Our galaxies are moving towards each other, so if you stick around for approximately 3 billion years, it should be quite a show. But it's reckoned that as they are so large, there will be no collisions.

    Trivia (showing the insignificance of this planet on a universal scale)
    It takes a jet plane 48 hours to circumnavigate the Earth on the Equator at 500 m.p.h.

    To fly round the Equator of the largest sun known to man at the same speed of 500 m.p.h. would take just over 11 years.
     
  5. stephenbarnes

    stephenbarnes Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2013
    Messages:
    4,864
    User Reviews:
    0
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Ratings:
    +854
    "To fly round the Equator of the largest sun known to man at the same speed of 500 m.p.h. would take just over 11 years."

    I think you mean thousands of years read 2000-10,000 years. read that elseware
     
  6. Bill Hicks

    Bill Hicks Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2004
    Messages:
    7,108
    User Reviews:
    0
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Location:
    London, England.
    Ratings:
    +1,627
    If so, do they grit their car parks. if they have snow that is?
     
  7. The Glimmer Man

    The Glimmer Man Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2013
    Messages:
    104
    User Reviews:
    0
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    West Norfolk, England
    Ratings:
    +40
    I must have heard that wrong.

    I just calculated it at approximately 173 years to go round VY Canis Major, the largest known star (well... it was a year or so ago, but who knows these days)
     
  8. Doug the D

    Doug the D Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2010
    Messages:
    5,044
    User Reviews:
    0
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Ratings:
    +5,608
    "This planet might have the same mass as Earth, but it is certainly not Earth-like," said lead astronomer Dr David Kipping, from the Harvard-Smithsonian Centre for Astrophysics in the US.

    Now, call me old-fashioned, but to be a 'twin' usually means that some sort of similarity exists between 2 things? This just sounds like a deliberately poorly-worded headline to me. Is is from the Daily Mail by any chance ;)

    edit: Sky News has the same duff headline.
     
    Last edited: Jan 7, 2014
  9. aVdub

    aVdub Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2010
    Messages:
    4,175
    User Reviews:
    0
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Ratings:
    +2,467
  10. DPinBucks

    DPinBucks Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2008
    Messages:
    5,682
    User Reviews:
    0
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Location:
    Burnham, Bucks
    Ratings:
    +1,304
    About 900 years. The largest known stars are about 3 billion miles in diameter (the Sun is about 900,000).
     
  11. AvengingAngel67

    AvengingAngel67 Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    505
    User Reviews:
    0
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Location:
    Durham
    Ratings:
    +88
    There is only one Gaia.

    The right distance away from the sun... distance from the moon - just so. Runs like clockwork - for the moment...

    ... All by chance? I think not. :)

    Rob
     
  12. Iccz

    Iccz Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2008
    Messages:
    24,058
    User Reviews:
    0
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Location:
    Keystone City
    Ratings:
    +6,750
    Of course it's not by chance, it's by nature.

    It runs like clockwork because everything that is running like clockwork has adapted to the environment it's in.

    It's by chance that the conditions were perfect for it to happen though. But then again, given the, possible infinite, vastness of our universe, it's not really THAT surprising.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Useful Useful x 1
    • List
  13. AvengingAngel67

    AvengingAngel67 Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    505
    User Reviews:
    0
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Location:
    Durham
    Ratings:
    +88
    Oh ye of little faith. I still believe it is the only organic celestial body in the cosmos. But then again that's just me...

    Rob:D
     
  14. Inferno

    Inferno Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Messages:
    4,920
    User Reviews:
    0
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Location:
    Bedlam, Warrington, Cheshire
    Ratings:
    +1,420

    Impossible, we will find one, whether we ever get there is remote but the only one, not a chance.
     
  15. AvengingAngel67

    AvengingAngel67 Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    505
    User Reviews:
    0
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Location:
    Durham
    Ratings:
    +88
    Aye, yer reet... ;) 'Science' has all the answers - like being able to label 30% of what space is comprised of.


    Rob
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 16, 2014
  16. Pisto_Grih

    Pisto_Grih Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    3,170
    User Reviews:
    0
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Location:
    Woking
    Ratings:
    +2,182
    I imagine it runs like clockwork because we set our clocks by it ;)
     
  17. wilbanat

    wilbanat Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2009
    Messages:
    5,512
    User Reviews:
    0
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Ratings:
    +5,521
    So who has the answer to the other 70% ??????
     
  18. AvengingAngel67

    AvengingAngel67 Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    505
    User Reviews:
    0
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Location:
    Durham
    Ratings:
    +88
    'Dark Matter' apparently... Not unlike the term 'Idiopathic'...

    Scientific speak for 'Dunno, haven't a clue'.;)

    Rob:)
     
  19. Trollslayer

    Trollslayer Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2007
    Messages:
    18,590
    User Reviews:
    0
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Location:
    Bristol
    Ratings:
    +5,534
    No, scientific speak for 'I will ridicule other people's hard work so I can try and look clever but still do nothing.'
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
    • List
  20. lucasisking

    lucasisking Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2007
    Messages:
    16,925
    User Reviews:
    60
    Products Owned:
    1
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    177
    Location:
    Isle of Wight
    Ratings:
    +8,985
    "Dunno I havent got a clue" is the entire basis of science. It is all about the investigation of nature.

    If you dont even grasp that, then you have no business commenting on science matters at all.
     
  21. IronGiant

    IronGiant Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2003
    Messages:
    50,757
    User Reviews:
    0
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Location:
    Oxford UK
    Ratings:
    +26,446
    Rob has a rather jaundiced outlook on life that creeps into his postings. We are encouraging him to leave that behind him.
     
  22. AvengingAngel67

    AvengingAngel67 Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    505
    User Reviews:
    0
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Location:
    Durham
    Ratings:
    +88
    ... yourselves and YT it seems... :)

    Rob
     
  23. stephenbarnes

    stephenbarnes Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2013
    Messages:
    4,864
    User Reviews:
    0
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Ratings:
    +854
    It would take us 19,000 to 81,000 yars to reach a star that is 4.22 light years away.

    So it'll take us around 1 million to 4 million years to get there (200 light years)

    and once a planet is 13 billion light years away, about 520000000000000 years.
     
  24. Ste7en

    Ste7en Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2005
    Messages:
    4,887
    User Reviews:
    0
    Products Owned:
    3
    Products Wanted:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Location:
    Durham
    Ratings:
    +1,162
    Nah, everyone knows you just go full belt in a wheelchair and smash into a mirror to get there.
     
  25. AvengingAngel67

    AvengingAngel67 Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    505
    User Reviews:
    0
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Location:
    Durham
    Ratings:
    +88
    I think you should substitute that for Uraemic... :laugh:

    Rob:)
     
  26. Trollslayer

    Trollslayer Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2007
    Messages:
    18,590
    User Reviews:
    0
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Location:
    Bristol
    Ratings:
    +5,534
    With what acceleration/deceleration?
    If you could get up to light speed very quickly it could be 50 years.
     
  27. Dancook

    Dancook Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2007
    Messages:
    14,205
    User Reviews:
    0
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Ratings:
    +4,886
    maybe I missed something, but to reach a star 4.22 light years away - travelling at the speed of light it would take.. 4.22 years?
     
  28. stephenbarnes

    stephenbarnes Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2013
    Messages:
    4,864
    User Reviews:
    0
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Ratings:
    +854
  29. Dancook

    Dancook Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2007
    Messages:
    14,205
    User Reviews:
    0
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Ratings:
    +4,886
    I see I was interpreting 'very quickly' as instantaneous :D
     
  30. stephenbarnes

    stephenbarnes Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2013
    Messages:
    4,864
    User Reviews:
    0
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Ratings:
    +854
    warp speed from 0 to multiple speed of light in star trek, suffer from a few trillion g in g forces lol. Be funny if geordi forgot to switch on inertia dampners when they went to warp.

    as for power requirements you'd probably need a sun or black hole as a power source. Certainly not rocket propellent you'd probably use earth's entire water (hydrogen) supply for a space craft to reach near speed of light.
     
    Last edited: Jan 18, 2014

Share This Page

Loading...