I liked 6 Underground's actions scenes. I thought they looked very real and less CGI than others. But hey, that's just me.
Even Richer?Crap. Watched first 30 minutes and realised what a crap this is and switched it off. What has become of Mark.
I am with you strightforwards funWell I quite liked it as in a good vehicle for Warlberg in that classic 80s mode of wise cracking odd couple buddy flick . Was nothing more than that . Its not to be taken tp serious like the underrated Broken City . Great PQ with DV and soundstage with Atmos .
Yup I quite enjoyed it and a 7.5 /10 for me as bit of harmless fun.
I am with you strightforwards fun
agreed, I really don't look at movies starring Makie mark and directed by peter berg and expect an Oliviere, type performance , I do however think fast and furious with an x certificate on a budget.I think people take films too serious these days i see loads with 8 and 9s outta 10 and i think are pap, sometimes i enjoy these 5 and 6 films much better than the serious crap out there
Well I quite liked it as in a good vehicle for Warlberg in that classic 80s mode of wise cracking odd couple buddy flick . Was nothing more than that . Its not to be taken tp serious like the underrated Broken City . Great PQ with DV and soundstage with Atmos .
Yup I quite enjoyed it and a 7.5 /10 for me as bit of harmless fun.
Yup , found it no better or worse than Two Guns that Cas gave a 7 for back in the day and at least a couple of points better than Netflix 6 Underground .
I think people take films too serious these days i see loads with 8 and 9s outta 10 and i think are pap, sometimes i enjoy these 5 and 6 films much better than the serious crap out there
Good to know.
Ha yeah good point, Two Guns = 7 is an insult to any other 7 film. This can NEVER be worse than that Paul Calf.
TBO I can totally see this as a erm, munchie film. And you know, some films are made to be just that. Catering for an audience, is catering for an audience, be them used to holding bi-noc-u-lars or bongs.
No. People dont take films too seriously they take Cas's reviews too seriously.I think people take films too serious these days i see loads with 8 and 9s outta 10 and i think are pap, sometimes i enjoy these 5 and 6 films much better than the serious crap out there
Agree, its really just a popcorn flick a bit of light entertainment, its not trying to win any awards, actually enjoyed it far more than 6 underground and fast and furious which has just gone silly since the first couple which bordered on believable.I think people take films too serious these days i see loads with 8 and 9s outta 10 and i think are pap, sometimes i enjoy these 5 and 6 films much better than the serious crap out there
Personally, I find Cas's Reviews give me more insight into a Movie than the Trailer or the IMDB Synopsis. But many Films & Programmes he Reviews I don't bother watching, or watch & disagree. It's just an info tool to me.No. People dont take films too seriously they take Cas's reviews too seriously.
Seen that with Mark Kermode.
These are juat journalists who love and know films. They are not Gods.
I mean Mark loves Lost in Translation but it is one of a handful of films i had to switch off. My opinion matters more to me.
As a kid, when on Holiday, I could sit by the seashore after Dusk & watch a lighthouse for Hours.Much rather watch this for 2 hours than something like the lighthouse!