Discussion in 'Microsoft Windows' started by Synchro, Apr 22, 2007.
Please let me know if you ar using any NAS, or SAN's with Vista and what your experiences are?
The reason I ask, is because I wanted to get my old SC101 working, but found out that currently Netgear do not support Vista with this product
Old systems and applications are not the things to attempt on Vista, be prepared to be often disappointed.
Still no one using NAS with Vista?
I use a Synology DS-106e NAS with Vista and it works perfectly
It is configured by a web interface, so not Operating System dependant
If your Netgear is controlled by a program that has to be installed to your PC's hard drive, then if Netgear haven't updated it to be compatible with Vista you may have a problem
Netgear web page says it is compatible with 2000 (SP4), XP Home or Pro (SP1 and SP2) and 2003 (SP4)
That would be ideal, if it took 2 x HDD, rather than just a single disk
Synology also do a 'CubeStation' which can take 4 hard drives
Do you know if this uses a web browser as control?
Have you tried running the SC101 software? If it doesn't work, you could try running it in XP compatability mode.
I'm using an old Synology DS101 and a NasLite box with no problems on Vista.
I would think that the Cubestation would use a web browser configuration as all the DS range do. One thing to watch on the Synology stuff - i did a firmware upgrade which then proceeded to wipe the hard drive (Luckily i'd just copied almost everything to the NasLite server i'd just built) It did give a warning beforehand, but it looked like the normal "just in case anything goes wrong" warning.
It doesn't work, which ever way you try and install/run it. I'll have to wait for Netgear to release the right drivers, but its not a nice wait
I'm pretty sure that all Synology products are controlled by Web Browser
Quick thread hijack here....
Does anyone know if the SC101 will accept hard drives with data on already, or do you have to format them before you can use them?
I'm about to build an HTPC and this would suit me down to the ground if I can put my existing HDDs in it and access then across the network, but not if I have to wipe them 1st.
I emailed Freecom about this same issue with one of their Classic network drives (I'm not using Vista yet, and mostly I connect my drive via USB to one PC anyway, so not really a biggie for me yet). They said they are not supporting NAS with Vista yet either, but suggested I try the raw drivers from the software house that developed them. I'll try to dig out the email when I get home.
Most NAS products use a flavour of Linux as their operating system, so when you install a hard drive into the NAS, it has to partition the drive for the Linux OS, so you loose any data that was previously on it
I'm using a Buffalo Terastation RAID 5 NAS with 3 Vista PCs generally without problems. File transfer is slower than under XP, and if you create a new foler on the network drive you can't see it until you manually refresh the window.
Why would file transfer be slower than in XP?
All file transfers seem to be slower in Vista than XP...even copying files between two drives in the same PC. There's quite a lot of discussion on the issue in other forums, not sure if there's a solid explanation for it yet.
Apparently this is true, Vista seems to generate at least twice as much network traffic as XP did, see the article below
I did my own test of a 701MB avi file from my NAS to XP and Vista
To XP it took 75 seconds giving a transfer of 9.35MB/s
To Vista it took 110 seconds giving a transfer of 6.37MB/s
I tried it serveral times with both XP and Vista and the time taken was identical each time, even stopping the extra protocols that exist in Vista did not make any difference
That's because it's not a proper NAS!
Ditch that fake NAS and spend it on something decent. A NAS doesn't require drivers for any PC to access it. The Netgear does.
Identical to a router/gateway/switch/modem all in one box, no drivers are needed.
I have a D-Link DNS-323, just had firmware update to fix Vista 4GB limitation, I think sounds like a Vista bug, not the D-Link as no problems with Linux or XP.
SC101 is now listed on a certain bidding site. Another (proper NAS) is nearly on order.
Ah, just checked, the info I had from Freecom was about NDAS drivers. In case anyone's interested, they said:
Just out of interest, which NAS have you chosen to nearly order
I've only ever bought one, and I was interested in your choice and any possible reasons
I'm in the market to buy another one, but I won't need one as featured as the Synology, so hopefully less money can be spent
For me its a toss up between:-
QNap Turbo Station TS-201 £164.49 inc VAT
D-Link DNS-323 £223.24 inc VAT
Synology Disk Station CS-407e £381.86 inc VAT
They are all Gigabit.
They all take 2 x Sata drives
QNap & D-Link do RAID 0 & RAID 1
Synology does RAID 0,1 & 5
My monies (currently) on the QNAP, good reviews (like here) and decent price. However, if when next month comes around and I come to justy the extra features on the Synology, then I may plump for that, but its unlikely.
N.B. I am only looking at 2 disk, Gigabit units.
Couldnt risk waiting till next month. My life would not have been worth living if all the piccies and videos had been lost. Just installed the QNAP today.
Could you keep us updated with how the QNAP is going, as I may be interested in one - many thanks
Is anyone using a NAS for streaming music to Vista Media Center across a network?
I've gone though a couple of devices and never had much success with Windows XP Media Center Edition. I couldn't get the SC-101 to work with MCE despite working very well with a standard XP machine so I ebayed it. Then I got a cheap Safecom NSUR-10100F caddy. That got rid of the client software issue but I've found the caddy is too slow, I often have to refresh folder views to see all the content and this means MCE was struggling to see the music files on there.
Now I've moved to Vista Media Center, I'm using a duplicated local copy of my music until I can find a NAS that will do the business. I've learnt my lesson with doing NAS on the cheap but there's a lot of kit out there - can anyone give me a recommendation?
Thanks, that's good info. I have a friend who's been happy with a Buffalo Linkstation so it looks like I'll got that way. Cheers.
My new QNAP (TS-201) is performing great. I am only using a single hard drive (a certain online retailer borked up my order date and I should have 2 x 750gb drive installed as raid 1) at the moment. I am only using it as a repository for my backed up data (via Live OnCare), but it's packed with features, some of which I'll look in to, once I get time. I've also used an SC101, but no longer own it.
I won't be doing a review of it, as the one here will be much better than any I could do. One part, from within the review, worth mentioning is:-
Which might be useful to some people.
Separate names with a comma.