Nakamichi Av10

Discussion in 'AV Receivers & Amplifiers' started by smit, Mar 8, 2002.

  1. smit

    smit
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    Has anybody used Nakamichi AV10?
    What is the quality of the product? - any problems with the unit or reliability issues.

    I am aware that this product do not have DPLII or DTS-ES, but
    it is a mean machine.

    Many AV amps are good for AV porpose , but Musical quality
    is not taht brilliant.
     
  2. PaulWh

    PaulWh
    Standard Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2008
    Messages:
    4
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Location:
    Auckland
    Ratings:
    +0
    I've just gotten one to replace my AV-1 which has been an excellent amp for me over the last 2 years or so. And I only used it, and now the "new" AV-10, as a (100W+) stereo amp - am not remotely (no pun intended) interested in hometheatre.

    I got the AV-10, together with an MB-10 CDplayer, to see if this optical interconnect business would be "the answer" for how to get a decent sound out of the dreadful CD format - sampling only an octave above what you can hear (when young at least:() - I now use DVDaudio on the computer for "taping" offof the FM radio now - after 10+ years of using exquisite Nak cassette decks for this job.

    But, as you say, times change - TDK SAs or SAXs are 7 or 8+$s each for 90 minutes versus about 40c for a DVD for 4 or 5 hours of audioquality 99% as good as that offof a good Nak analogue tape - I "record" at 96K/16bit sampling rate so I get about 2 or 3 "CD equivalents" onto a DVD.

    I find the sound of my new AV-10<optical>MB-10 setup to be wonderful - a "quantum leap" in audio reproduction - it's (almost :)) worth listening to CDs again! Being a baroque & renaissance recorder maker the harpsichord sound is critical for me and at last I'm getting the ability to hear it properly - eg to hear what temperament is being used. Basically the CDformat has, up till now, "destroyed" the (very sharp rise-time) sound of harpsichords - on the "lower grade" CD player setups I've had until now. One can hear the trucks etc changing gear outside the recording venues - but, as a friend says, What sort of truck was it? - my hifi setup is not quite there yet :):) - better speakers are the next "research area".

    Surprisingly, doing some A/B experimenting, the sound out of the MB-10's headphone jack is not as good as the sound of the (same track, same phones) out of the AV-10's headphone jack - maybe a better DAC(s) in the amp rather than the more "basic" DAC(s) in the MB-10?? Any ideas anybody?

    PaulWh
    Te Henga Recorder Workshop

    PS A few days after posting the above and after a read of the excellent "DAC FAQ" posting in this forum I've just discovered that yes, a digital link through an ordinary RCA>RCA interconnect does seem to be noticeably better than the optical link between the amp and CDplayer. So it's the digital link that was "the answer" rather than the optical/digital. But is the quality of that interconn as important as it is on analogue interconns? I wouldn't think so. Dunno - I'll find out I spose.
     

Share This Page

Loading...
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice