Moon Shot

Discussion in 'Photography Forums' started by nokiauk, Aug 8, 2006.

  1. nokiauk

    nokiauk
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2004
    Messages:
    888
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Location:
    Edinburgh
    Ratings:
    +47
    Took this tonight, but it's not came out that great, any pointers as to whats wrong. Taken with a 70-300mm Canon lens on a 350D with tripod.

    Exif:

    Exposure: 1/250 s at f/5.6
    Exposure mode: Manual
    ISO: 200
    Focal Length 300mm
    Model: Canon 350D

    This is the 100% crop from the original.

    [​IMG]

    :lease:
     
  2. richard plumb

    richard plumb
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2002
    Messages:
    14,514
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    133
    Location:
    Windsor
    Ratings:
    +1,054
    We had a similar problem on here a couple of moons ago.. Seems people wait for the full moon to get a better pic, but actually it makes it worse.

    Mainly though the moon is full, so there isn't so much detail. You want some shadow on the moon which creates more detail along the shadow line (the terminator)

    you could also unsharp mask it to get a bit more detail, but best to wait until it wanes a bit, then try again.

    Here's one from me with the canon 70-300, just to show your lens is just about long enough:

    [​IMG]

    have a search around, there are a couple of moon threads on here with good examples
     
  3. Jazz Monkey Jr

    Jazz Monkey Jr
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2005
    Messages:
    14,356
    Products Owned:
    2
    Products Wanted:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    137
    Location:
    Garstang, Lancs
    Ratings:
    +1,632
    It looks like it is out of focus, just set the focus to infinity and it should be right.

    There's a good thread here with some good moon shot tips.

    Here's one from Paul D, looks like the moon is in a similar position, this was done with a digital camera and a decent telescope.
    [​IMG]
     
  4. nokiauk

    nokiauk
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2004
    Messages:
    888
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Location:
    Edinburgh
    Ratings:
    +47
    not sure why focus was wrong, focus was done manually, no infinity marking on lens however.
     
  5. Gordon @ Convergent AV

    Gordon @ Convergent AV
    Distinguished Member AVForums Sponsor

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    14,230
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Location:
    Living in Surrey, covering UK!
    Ratings:
    +3,096
  6. Pink Fairy

    Pink Fairy
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    Messages:
    240
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Location:
    Watford
    Ratings:
    +32
    Here's one from last month, handheld 300mm + 1.4x tc at 1/80 (the wonders of VR/I.S.)


    [​IMG]
     
  7. BananaTiger

    BananaTiger
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2005
    Messages:
    1,194
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Ratings:
    +124
    I don't have any experience with any long zooms since my longest focal length is only 70mm :( But I remember someone telling me (and please corrent me if I was mistold this info) that with the longer zooms, even on a tripod, it can be prone to camera shake. Using a remote shutter release, or setting the timer will help in this regard.

    EDIT: Might be my friend was talking about macro photography ... hmmm .... confused :confused:
     
  8. richard plumb

    richard plumb
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2002
    Messages:
    14,514
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    133
    Location:
    Windsor
    Ratings:
    +1,054

    longer zooms are more prone to camera shake as they exaggerate slight movements. Basic rule of thumb to avoid camera shake is 1/focal length.

    So on a 70mm lens, 1/70 should be enough to get a steady shot. On a 300mm, you need 1/300 - a lot faster. Add in the 1.6x of the 350d for example, and you get more like 1/500 for a 300mm lens.
     
  9. redmax

    redmax
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2002
    Messages:
    1,079
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    51
    Location:
    ESSEX, UK
    Ratings:
    +43
    The general rule (although there are exceptions) is that your shutter speed should be higher than your focal length for successful handheld shots.

    e.g. Focal length = 100mm - shutter speed should be 1/125

    If your shutter speed falls below focal length then mono or tripod is advised.
    One obvious exception is tracking a moving object. You may find that you need higher shutter speeds to catch objects sharply like the surfers in the Rip Curl thread but still need to support your camera.

    Shutter release cables are always useful for low light and slow shutter speeds as is the self timer and mirror lock-up function.

    Hope this helps
     
  10. nokiauk

    nokiauk
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2004
    Messages:
    888
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Location:
    Edinburgh
    Ratings:
    +47
    thanks for the help comments so far all.

    ps where's the thanks button gone?
     
  11. suniil

    suniil
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2005
    Messages:
    4,948
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Location:
    London SE5 / W1
    Ratings:
    +402
    i tried to shot the same today with nikon d50 / 70-300 lens, but the same result as of OP :(
     

Share This Page

Loading...