1. Join Now

    AVForums.com uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

MJA Pro 50 & Marantz 4200

Discussion in 'Home Cinema Speakers' started by Huggy, Feb 21, 2003.

  1. Huggy

    Huggy
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2002
    Messages:
    205
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    21
    Location:
    Kent, UK
    Ratings:
    +11
    I asked this question in a previous thread, but that thread went off on a different tack, so I'll try again.

    A Sevenoaks salesman was less than supportive of my proposed solution of:

    Marantz 4200 Receiver
    MJA Pro 50 sub
    2 Kef Egg Fronts (to please Mrs H)
    Mission M7C1 centre
    Mission M7ds rears

    To my ears the strange speaker set up works fine, and visually Mrs H is happy. However, while the sub with music is great, I feel the need for more oomph with movies. It's not terrible, just a reason for upgraditis in the future ;) .

    To his credit the salesman had said that my Marantz 4200 wasn’t powerful enough to do the MJA justice.

    My question is - is he right? Is it the Marantz or is it the MJA that's lacking? I know alot of you have this combination. What are your views?
     
  2. sounddog

    sounddog
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2002
    Messages:
    3,352
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    107
    Location:
    Leicestershire, UK
    Ratings:
    +449
    Sounds a suitable setup to me ... might be worth considering a third egg though for your centre to keep the tonal balance constant accross the front three channels.

    Do you already own a Marantz SR4200 btw ... cause if not you might find it difficult to get hold of one.
     
  3. Huggy

    Huggy
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2002
    Messages:
    205
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    21
    Location:
    Kent, UK
    Ratings:
    +11
    I went against the Sevenoaks guys advice and have this set up.

    The 3rd egg in the centre is not an option - Mrs H didn't like it sitting on top of the telly - the Mission centre is more streamlined, and to be frank, I really am happy with that arrangement.

    No it's the sub/receiver combination, I'm worried about.
     
  4. wilber

    wilber
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2002
    Messages:
    1,970
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    51
    Ratings:
    +30
    To quote MJ Acoustics - "if it makes a sound add a sub". Your Marantz is a capable piece of kit and so is your sub so really it's a question of setup I would guess - i'm certainly no expert on setting up subs (and I got shown that in five minutes talking to the MJ Acoustics guy in Bristol today) But what I do know is that there's a lot more to subs that just plugging them in and connecting them to the amp. mjacoustics.co.uk has a section about setting up your sub and the guy at the show today (Phil Mason - the M in MJ) said if I had ANY questions about my sub I was to give them a call and if necessary he would talk to me (you won't get an offer like that from Mr Kef I dare say).

    Perhaps those with more knowledge can answer your question this time. :suicide:
     
  5. James45

    James45
    Standard Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2002
    Messages:
    2,844
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    59
    Location:
    Taking Care of Business
    Ratings:
    +0
    hang on a second what has the receiver got to do with the sub? unless its a passive sub the amp will send a signal to the sub's own amplification so its the sub that decides its own ompph, the reciever's power output has nothing to do with it.
     
  6. Huggy

    Huggy
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2002
    Messages:
    205
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    21
    Location:
    Kent, UK
    Ratings:
    +11
    Honest to God, this is what the salesman told me. Was this all sales bull**** to try to get me to buy a bigger and better receiver???

    :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:
     
  7. mandlebrot

    mandlebrot
    Standard Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2001
    Messages:
    426
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Manchester, UK
    Ratings:
    +0
    Yes it was, salesmen:thumbsdow
     
  8. Ian J

    Ian J
    Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2001
    Messages:
    25,529
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Ratings:
    +4,906
    No, not necessarily bigger nor better but one in which they had a higher profit margin :rolleyes:

    Respectable dealers try hard to persuade people that the service they provide is worth the extra cost of buying from them over an internet box shifter and then a dork like this opens his mouth and ruins all their hard work in a minute of stupidity.
     

Share This Page

Loading...