Meshuggener
Novice Member
Hey guys and thank you for accepting me to the forum all the way from New Zealand!
I managed to somewhat eliminate Cambridge cxa81 from my shootout. It's voice is too scooped for the genre I listen to predominantly. Eliminated the Yamaha 803d as well due to the top end being too thin and the soundstage feeling too unnaturally separated despite it's great power and detail.
So I tried Marantz out for the first time (nr1200) driving my kef q750 and kube 10 sub. Instantly preferred the voice of marantz to the Cambridge cxa81 for rock music. More muscular and warm and hey presto MIDRANGE PUNCH!
Despite it feeling a bit underpowered I really like the way the marantz house sound works with my music taste (Tool, Meshuggah, Dire Straits, Pink Floyd Metallica etc)
I'm now looking at the Marantz Pm7000n or the Arcam sa20 with volumio streamer, both amps have toroidal trannies but the arcam boasts 90w class G per channel vs 60w class A/B for the marantz.
Marantz has no qobuz built in to the streamer and only a single sub out so can't operate true stereo subs.
Arcam with volumio will have qobuz built in and uses pre outs for the sub so can eventually do stereo subs once I save up for second kube10.
Price difference between both setups is marantz $2250 vs arcam/volumio $3050 which ironically means the money freed up via the marantz route can't be used for another sub as it doesn't have pre outs.
Does anyone have experience with both these amps? I can't audition both together so I'd love to hear if anyone can tell me the difference in general voicing of arcam vs marantz in terms of soundstage depth, detail, dynamics and warmth?
Worried the marantz may be underpowered for heavy volumes and the streamer too limited but if the Marantz House sound is better suited for me than the arcam I'll deal with the limitations.
Cheers all.
I managed to somewhat eliminate Cambridge cxa81 from my shootout. It's voice is too scooped for the genre I listen to predominantly. Eliminated the Yamaha 803d as well due to the top end being too thin and the soundstage feeling too unnaturally separated despite it's great power and detail.
So I tried Marantz out for the first time (nr1200) driving my kef q750 and kube 10 sub. Instantly preferred the voice of marantz to the Cambridge cxa81 for rock music. More muscular and warm and hey presto MIDRANGE PUNCH!
Despite it feeling a bit underpowered I really like the way the marantz house sound works with my music taste (Tool, Meshuggah, Dire Straits, Pink Floyd Metallica etc)
I'm now looking at the Marantz Pm7000n or the Arcam sa20 with volumio streamer, both amps have toroidal trannies but the arcam boasts 90w class G per channel vs 60w class A/B for the marantz.
Marantz has no qobuz built in to the streamer and only a single sub out so can't operate true stereo subs.
Arcam with volumio will have qobuz built in and uses pre outs for the sub so can eventually do stereo subs once I save up for second kube10.
Price difference between both setups is marantz $2250 vs arcam/volumio $3050 which ironically means the money freed up via the marantz route can't be used for another sub as it doesn't have pre outs.
Does anyone have experience with both these amps? I can't audition both together so I'd love to hear if anyone can tell me the difference in general voicing of arcam vs marantz in terms of soundstage depth, detail, dynamics and warmth?
Worried the marantz may be underpowered for heavy volumes and the streamer too limited but if the Marantz House sound is better suited for me than the arcam I'll deal with the limitations.
Cheers all.