Quantcast

Marantz launch sleek NR1607 AV receiver

flashf1

Active Member
Does anyone know are there any major advantages over last years NR1606?
 

dgilberts

Active Member
Does anyone know are there any major advantages over last years NR1606?
Looks like duel band WIFI and improved on screen graphics?
 

flashf1

Active Member
Great, that's not too much. Just took delivery of 1606 and was hoping I wasn't going to miss out!
 

Pulsar

Well-known Member
Great, that's not too much. Just took delivery of 1606 and was hoping I wasn't going to miss out!
I took delivery of a 1606 last Wednesday so I feel your pain. That said, it doesn't sound like there's been much of an upgrade.
 

Pulsar

Well-known Member
What are these like? I've been casually looking at them, but can't find any reviews.
I've spent all of 5 minutes with mine listening to a few familiar music tracks in stereo and it sounded less impressive that the Denon 3310 it replaced but overall 'fine'. I think there's no escaping the fact that these units are a compromise on absolute sound quality due to their form factor.

Overall I'm happy with what I've seen and heard from the unit and will be keeping it. I'd just say that you should probably go for a full-size unit if you can accommodate the size.

** All of the above comes with the caveat that I haven't completed the full setup procedure yet which may well improve things further **
 

flashf1

Active Member
I'd have to disagree with Pulsar, however I'm coming from an av receiver less than half the price of a Denon 3310! I'm coming from a Yamaha rxv679, and for me the Marantz with music in stereo is far nicer, warmer and I would say detailed, also more dynamic. I'm using q-acoustics 3020 on the front, matching centre and 3010 for the rears, Dali e9f sub.

I have run the multi point calibration and it sounds fantastic in my 15x15 room, no lack of power, It just needs to be turned up slightly more that the Yamaha, but still can't get it past 75%, way too loud!

I genuinely do not think there is any difference in the quality of sound due to the lower wattage or slimmer form factor, this to me sounds the exact same as my friends Marantz sr5010, but with less power.

Cheers
 

flashf1

Active Member
Whats a better option (if size isn't an issue) for around the £4-500 mark then?
Maybe if you need to fill a large room have a look at the Marantz SR5009, it's the previous years model, still available, just check out if the features fill your requirements. If your room is 300sqft or less, the 1606 is perfect
 

stosoorok

Novice Member
Does anyone know are there any major advantages over last years NR1606?
Looks like dual band WIFI and improved on screen graphics?
Really interesting, I saw no difference except dual band wifi and DSD 5.8MHz support. Looks like NR1606 is with improved screen graphics too. Maybe there are internal modifications for future firmware upgrades and speed improvement.
 

stevos

Distinguished Member
I would be interested to know how they measure those 90watts, seems a little optimistic for such a small AVR.

EDIT: nevermind, using some very 'interesting' measurements

6 ohm, 1 kHz, 1%, 1ch Drive 90 W
6 ohm, 1 kHz. 0.7%, 2ch Drive 70 W
8 ohm, 20 Hz - 20 kHz, 0.08%, 2ch Drive 50 W

1% distortion would be pretty painful, only using 1 channel to drive a single frequency.

Ok so 50w using more realistic measurements, which is still pretty decent.
 

dante01

Distinguished Member
The rating is actually only 50 watts @ 8 ohm, 20 Hz - 20 kHz, 0.08%, 2ch driven. The more conventional sized receivers at this level would have rated output in the region of double this. The power ratings are exactly as they were for the NR1606.
 

Pulsar

Well-known Member
I think this 'lack' of power is what I heard when I turned it for a few minutes on music tracks I knew - it didn't exactly drive my Quad 11Ls with ease (compared to the Denon).

I think most people will appreciate that this amp is a compromise given the dimensions. I had a strict height budget and this suits perfectly. I might add a small (digital?) power amp at some point if I still feel wanting for power. I could stash a small unit in a cupboard next to the amp.

I am also considering looking for some new speakers for this setup and will certainly keep an eye on sensitivity now.
 

stosoorok

Novice Member
I think most people will appreciate that this amp is a compromise given the dimensions. I had a strict height budget and this suits perfectly. I might add a small (digital?) power amp at some point if I still feel wanting for power. I could stash a small unit in a cupboard next to the amp.
Exactly! These powerful AV receivers are so huge that I'm thinking NR1606/7+PM8005 would be the way to go...
 

al17

Novice Member
Very interested in this, my (12 maybe) year old Marantz SR4400 is just taking up too much room. I am interested to see what price this retails at. It seems there is little difference between this and the NR1606 though, so may go for that if it is cheaper.
 

stosoorok

Novice Member
I ordered NR1606. 1606/1607 price difference is about 200€ at the moment. I'm sure 1607 will not be cheaper than 1606 was. Hurry up, last ones are on sale now!
 

CiASpook

Active Member
Anyone know if the 1607 does 4k ondisplay audiobar? The 1606 does not display the audiobar on the tv when video is 4k...
 

Trending threads

Latest News

Sony XH81, XH80 and X70 TVs now available in UK
  • By Andy Bassett
  • Published
TV sales rise as UK stays home
  • By Andy Bassett
  • Published
AVForums Podcast: 30th March 2020
  • By Phil Hinton
  • Published
UK telecoms come together to keep country connected
  • By Andy Bassett
  • Published
Sharp and NEC display venture to push 8K + 5G tech
  • By Andy Bassett
  • Published
Top Bottom