kBm
Distinguished Member
I'm covering an week long event at the end of May. Both outdoor and indoor locations (including a theatre). Last year i hired the Nikon 24-70 F2.8 lens for the week. Gave me great results, especially in low light.
Since then i have bought the Sigma 17-70 f2.8, whilst it meet the demands i need and can produce the goods, i.e etc weddings, general photography, in low light i really need to crank up the ISO. In reality it's no match for the mighty Nikon! So i could hire out the Nikon lens again.
OR
I could hire a Sony A6000 + Sony 70-200 f2.8, slightly more cost, but it would give me extra focal length, decent quality lens and a 2nd body. I would need to sort out extra batteries.
I can see merits in both options, just need to decided (as i would like a play with the A6000
Thoughts?
Since then i have bought the Sigma 17-70 f2.8, whilst it meet the demands i need and can produce the goods, i.e etc weddings, general photography, in low light i really need to crank up the ISO. In reality it's no match for the mighty Nikon! So i could hire out the Nikon lens again.
OR
I could hire a Sony A6000 + Sony 70-200 f2.8, slightly more cost, but it would give me extra focal length, decent quality lens and a 2nd body. I would need to sort out extra batteries.
I can see merits in both options, just need to decided (as i would like a play with the A6000
Thoughts?