LCD 16:9 or 4:3

Discussion in 'LCD & LED LCD TVs Forum' started by jonwilde, Apr 23, 2004.

Tags:
  1. jonwilde

    jonwilde
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    Looking at a 20 to 23 inch LCD screen should I go for widescreen or full screen, I will be using it for mainly watching sky and playing the occasional DVD's.

    Thanks Jon
     
  2. LV426

    LV426
    Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2000
    Messages:
    13,571
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Location:
    Somewhere in South Yorkshire
    Ratings:
    +6,088
    Widescreen, then.
     
  3. jonwilde

    jonwilde
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    so you would't recommend a 4:3, why ?
     
  4. GaryB

    GaryB
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2002
    Messages:
    5,392
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    133
    Location:
    St Albans
    Ratings:
    +1,302
    Because virtually all DVDs, apart from those of older TV programmes and a large part of Sky's output are in widescreen. It's a shame to waste those extra inches. Even with CRT sets I can't think of a good reason for buying 4:3 any more.
     
  5. jonwilde

    jonwilde
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    so why dont Sony produce a 21" 16:9 screen, any ideas ?
     
  6. calscot

    calscot
    Standard Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2002
    Messages:
    665
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Milton Keynes
    Ratings:
    +0
    I agree, if you've got a digital tv signal then it's mostly broadcast in widescreen and most DVD's are. With 4:3 you'd have to watch it in letterbox mode with black bars top and bottom or in pan scan mode where the sides of the picture are just chopped off.

    The former means you'd be better off with a 16:9 as it would be neater and take up less space and the latter means you're missing out on an important part of the picture.

    You'd need about a 10% bigger diagonal size for a 4:3 to give the same size widescreen picture as a 16:9. So if you want to watch widescreen at 17" diagonal you would need a 19" 4:3 which would cost more than the equivalent 17" 16:9.
     
  7. calscot

    calscot
    Standard Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2002
    Messages:
    665
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Milton Keynes
    Ratings:
    +0
    Go for a 23" Philips or JVC at £974 or £1118 respectively. I plan to but would prefer the JVC so waiting for availability and a price drop to the level of the Philips.
     
  8. LV426

    LV426
    Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2000
    Messages:
    13,571
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Location:
    Somewhere in South Yorkshire
    Ratings:
    +6,088
    Probably a question best asked of Sony. But most of other other 'big names' and many lesser brands have 16x9* screens at various sizes, starting at 15, 17, 22/23, 26/27 and up.

    (* actually, some are 15x9).
     

Share This Page

Loading...
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice