Labours ongoing anti semitism row

  • Thread starter Deleted member 27989
  • Start date
Hey, Verdana is great for requirements documents!
Closet Comic Sans fans...
 
Bloody autocorrect.

Speaking of which, the guy who invented it died recently.

His funfair is next monkey.
 
The Tory brexiteers loathe to criticise the Hungarian PM's anti semitism because it may hinder the Brexit negotiations, not a good look

transcript.png
 
The Tory brexiteers loathe to criticise the Hungarian PM's anti semitism because it may hinder the Brexit negotiations, not a good look
One or two here too who praise Orban, Le Pen, Salvini et al, while enthusiastically condemning Labour anti-Semitism
 
One or two here too who praise Orban, Le Pen, Salvini et al, while enthusiastically condemning Labour anti-Semitism
Pah, magnetic interference with their moral compass ;)
 
Let's keep it civil guys (and apologies for the typo in the "reason for deletion")
 
If Berger had fears for her own safety, I wonder why she chose to walk the length of the Dock road to the Conference instead of being driven directly to the door like everyone else? The photo in the article shows her walking past the Liver Building which is probably a mile from the conference.

Before anyone suggests I’m defending those who have aimed abuse at her, I’m not. It’s just that it looks like a photo opportunity that i’d have assumed the Police would have advised against?
 
If Berger had fears for her own safety, I wonder why she chose to walk the length of the Dock road to the Conference instead of being driven directly to the door like everyone else? The photo in the article shows her walking past the Liver Building which is probably a mile from the conference.

Before anyone suggests I’m defending those who have aimed abuse at her, I’m not. It’s just that it looks like a photo opportunity that i’d have assumed the Police would have advised against?

Possibly because she fears more, those inside the conference? And who can blame her.
 
Possibly because she fears more, those inside the conference? And who can blame her.

Not sure that makes any sense? Unless the Police escort joined her at her seat inside the conference, or she had her own conference on the Albert Dock, I'm not sure I follow?
 
Possibly because she fears more, those inside the conference? And who can blame her.

But nothing in that article from The Metro says that she was threatened by Labour members or activists? All it says is that she got online abuse.

I'm not a Labour party member or activist but I could theoretically and anonymously send her abuse online related to her Jewish heritage. Does that make her safer outside the conference or inside?

How do you surmise that she feels more threatened or fearful of those inside the conference than outside the conference?
 
Possibly because she fears more, those inside the conference? And who can blame her.
Possibly some of that plus, undoubtedly, capitalising on the situation. Berger's a tiresome professional politician who's risen up the ranks purely through connections (great-niece of Manny Shinwell, friend of the Blairs, basking in the publicity, back in 2005, of being son Euan's supposed girlfriend, which she never was) and PR rather than honest convictions and talent. Parachuted into an ultra-safe northern seat.

EDIT: looks like she's had her Wikipedia page purged of the episode where she woefully mishandled a situation with a very young local politician ...

She was also on my radar as a quackophile ...
 
Last edited:
Maybe she just chose to walk the 3.5 miles from her Wavertree constituency office to the Convention Centre :)
 
But nothing in that article from The Metro says that she was threatened by Labour members or activists? All it says is that she got online abuse.
And the police thought this was credible enough to give her protection.

Why were they wrong?
 
And the police thought this was credible enough to give her protection.

Why were they wrong?

Prior to the convention I read a few articles that said Berger had been in consultation with the CST with regards to her protection rather than the Police, but the photos in the article show Merseyside Police alongside her so I guess so.
 
And the police thought this was credible enough to give her protection.

Why were they wrong?

I have no idea what you're on about. Please point where I said they were wrong or that the threat isn't credible...
 

The latest video from AVForums

TV Buying Guide - Which TV Is Best For You?
Subscribe to our YouTube channel
Back
Top Bottom