Discussion in 'General Chat' started by Dr Diversity, Jun 15, 2005.
Tom has made his choice but I think he has got it wrong, Nicole every time for me!
Nicole Kidman any day of the week!
Yeah Nicole for me too.
I think I would need to sample both to make a proper decision
Katie For Me please
Well, bear in mind that I didn't have a clue what Katie Holmes looked like until I saw this thread then had a search for her, but on first glance it has to be.....
Katie for me please
According to my 'gay test' i think I should be sharing 50-50 with tom and his missus....
But personally i prefer Katie (to Tom )
Katie for me. Nicole was crap in the sack.
Ms Holmes is (apparently) still a virgin so is unlikely to rock your world.
Its both for me... I just cant decide... one looks dirty as hell and the other is a virgin
I think I'd have to toss for it...
Katie definatley, cant possibly understand why anyone would think otherwise.
I'm not fussed...but possibly kate as she's younger, and I'm not getting any...younger, that is!
I didn't think Tom liked girls!
Sorry I know its personal taste and all that but how can you guys prefer Nicole?? She's looking more witch like every time I see her....pale, thin, pinched face, long nose.
Sorry bit bitchy but hey
I didn't really know what Katie Holmes looked liked Either.
Saw her on the MTV Movie awards and can only now see her as Katie "no neck and mans shoulders" Holmes
Given the age difference you wouldn't think he'd be able to do better but he quite clearly can.
Firstly, thats just mean. Secondly, admit it, you DO own Dawsons Crack on DVD in its entirety dont you......?!?!?
From Toms point of view isn't Nicole "been there done that" while Katie must be 20 years younger and is definately "pastures green"
Not that I mind, I have a 21 year old wife anyway!
don't think much of either of them. If I was a multi millionaire film star, I could definately do better !
Wouldn't choose either...far better out there!!
Poor Katie may have gotten more than what she bargained for.
BTW: Penelope Cruz is missing as choice. Not my type at all though ...
Wouldn't say no to either to be honest, but on balance would go for Nicole.
Mind you, looking at recent photos of her, someone needs to take her to a cake shop and point out a few of the fattening ones..................
well, after the way tom was dancing on the sofa the other week (on some US tv program) - I guess this may longer be the case...
I Wouldn't say no to either, but theres a lot better out there,
Too late for Katie now, Tom has proposed
I have just read on teletext that Tom Cruise has announced his engagement to someone 16 years his junior.
I always think that there's something faintly disturbing about a girl willing to consort with a man old enough to be her father who has been married so many times before - or am I just old fashioned
As a father, yes you would find it disturbing , but if you were in Tom Cruise's position I doubt it
He has only been married twice before: Nicole Kidman and Mimi Rogers. I find it more concerning that he could leave Nicole - but then Katie is 16 years younger
Separate names with a comma.