1. Join Now

    AVForums.com uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

JVC DLA-X7900 D-ILA Projector Review & Comments

Discussion in 'Projectors, Screens & Video Processors' started by Phil Hinton, Dec 22, 2017.


    1. Phil Hinton

      Phil Hinton
      Editor Staff Member

      Joined:
      Jan 18, 2001
      Messages:
      9,998
      Products Owned:
      3
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Location:
      AVForums
      Ratings:
      +7,726
    2. HAWK-EYE

      HAWK-EYE
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      May 13, 2006
      Messages:
      1,112
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      83
      Ratings:
      +478
      Thanks for the review.
      To get the Sony 360s Native resolution to Native 1:1 pixel an option in the service menu needs to be changed. Then I bet you will seen a difference between true Native 4k and e-shifted from your seated distance.

      Sample X9500 (x9xx are even softer) Vs VW760 same lens as in VW360s.

      LUCY | JVC X9500/RS620 V SONY 760/885ES #1 : Screenshot Comparison
       
      Last edited: Dec 22, 2017
    3. Phil Hinton

      Phil Hinton
      Editor Staff Member

      Joined:
      Jan 18, 2001
      Messages:
      9,998
      Products Owned:
      3
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Location:
      AVForums
      Ratings:
      +7,726
      Why would Sony release a projector that doesn't 1:1 out of the box? I've fully tested the VW360ES using the native panel and panel zoom functions. It is not going to make any huge difference in terms of resolution and besides, as I say in all these reviews, there's more to it than just resolution. In that respect the VW360ES can't match the JVC.
       
      • Agree Agree x 2
      • Like Like x 1
      • List
    4. Abacus

      Abacus
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Jan 19, 2015
      Messages:
      311
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      47
      Location:
      Torbay
      Ratings:
      +145
      Another top notch review that other reviewers should take note of, one thing I am surprised about however is why projector manufactures still haven’t added Dolby vision, as I would have thought it would be ideal for use with projectors.

      On a side note, have you got any of the new sub £5000 laser projectors in for review yet, (Some online shops are showing the Acer laser at £3500) as theoretically it could really shake up the market.

      Merry Christmas

      Bill
       
    5. Phil Hinton

      Phil Hinton
      Editor Staff Member

      Joined:
      Jan 18, 2001
      Messages:
      9,998
      Products Owned:
      3
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Location:
      AVForums
      Ratings:
      +7,726
      Thanks for the kind words, Bill. We will be looking at these in the new year after CES, so stay tuned and Merry Christmas.
       
    6. bandyka

      bandyka
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Oct 6, 2010
      Messages:
      3,121
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      136
      Location:
      Sydney Australia
      Ratings:
      +966
      Agree. I have tested the 9900/9500 760ES/Z1 and from normal distance the absolute resolution difference is minimal and I prefered the JVC image over the Sony with SDR, especially with low APL stuff there is no comparison end of story. Not to mention the Sony will dither 60p 4:2:2 or higher which introduces banding etc. There is more fine detail on the Sony though if you look hard. The service menu tweak does help.
      Also found that eshift 5 softens the image compared to the previous version but it's very slight.
       
    7. eiren

      eiren
      Distinguished Member

      Joined:
      Oct 12, 2007
      Messages:
      11,211
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      1
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Ratings:
      +2,791
      Bad comparison as one of those shots looks close to being calibrated (the Sony) and the JVC doesn't.

      Having said that, as I say every time, I love JVC but refuse to buy a fake 4K projector.

      Come on JVC - release a proper one that isn't 10s of thousands please :)
       
    8. jfinnie

      jfinnie
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Oct 1, 2004
      Messages:
      3,461
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      133
      Location:
      Norwich
      Ratings:
      +1,147
      From what I understand as of yet there isn't a published Dolby Vision for projectors spec; so there isn't anything for manufacturers to add yet. There was quite a lot of debate over at "the other place" on whether it would ever happen.
      http://www.avsforum.com/forum/24-di...041-dolby-vision-coming-front-projectors.html
       
    9. Russ 66

      Russ 66
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Jan 5, 2004
      Messages:
      1,664
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      116
      Location:
      Norfolk
      Ratings:
      +980
      @Phil Hinton, Good review, I agree about the autocalibration, the Spyder 5 isn't the best but a Spyder 5 express is only £90. I use the autocal to get the gamma in line which it does well then use a better meter with Chromapure to get the greyscale tracking better. Doing this you get ruler flat gamma.
      In the autocal software there is also a manual gamma editor (12pt from memory) so you can still manually adjust the gamma. Why this couldn't be in the projector controls is a mystery.
       
      • Like Like x 1
      • Useful Useful x 1
      • List
    10. dfdd

      dfdd
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Oct 18, 2008
      Messages:
      1,002
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      63
      Ratings:
      +182
      Great review, is there enough of an improvement to upgrade from a x7000, just for watching movies, or not significantly better? Cheers
       
    11. ryanvincent

      ryanvincent
      Banned

      Joined:
      Jul 26, 2017
      Messages:
      464
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      46
      Location:
      Stoke/London
      Ratings:
      +175
      JVC really are king when it comes to projectors, great review many thanks.
       
    12. Javs

      Javs
      Member

      Joined:
      Dec 6, 2011
      Messages:
      1
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      6
      Ratings:
      +3
      Hi, That is a not even close to a controlled same-time-same-gear comparison sorry.

      I own the JVC in that comparison and thats my image. It is also calibrated, the Sony which is onwed by a different person in the UK was not calibrated.

      They are two competely different situations, the JVC in Australia with 22mpixel Canon And the Sony was a different user in the UK with a 44mpixel Nikon. Different gear, way different settings and source players, different continents!

      The Sony 760 will of course be sharper but those photos are not a fair comparison, I made that very clear in the AVS thread you took that link from.

      Cheers
       
      • Like Like x 1
      • Agree Agree x 1
      • Useful Useful x 1
      • List
    13. Batdog

      Batdog
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Mar 12, 2005
      Messages:
      1,722
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      84
      Ratings:
      +444
      Hi

      I don’t claim to be the expert, but from what I gather the X7000/7500/7900 are broadly the same when it comes to playing Blu-ray, so it would be pointless spending thousands to upgrade just for that.

      I think the main improvements in each generation were the addition of gaming mode to the X7500, so if you’re a gamer then that’s important (the lag in my X500 makes gaming a no go and I imagine the X7000 is similar). The gaming mode in the X7500 reduces input lag to similar to a tv (40m/s or similar I think?) so it’s no longer an issue.

      I think the major additional benefit of the X7900 is the new HDR modes so I’d expect playback of UHDBD to be better than either of the X7000/7500.
       
      • Like Like x 1
      • Thanks Thanks x 1
      • List
    14. Russ 66

      Russ 66
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Jan 5, 2004
      Messages:
      1,664
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      116
      Location:
      Norfolk
      Ratings:
      +980
      The X7500 also has the improved HDR mode, the main difference between the X7000 and X7900 is the HDR mode and Eshift5. Looking at owners feedback it’s not clear that eshift 5 is actually better than 4.
       
    15. scorpion 13

      scorpion 13
      Member

      Joined:
      Aug 12, 2005
      Messages:
      20
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      6
      Location:
      Greece
      Ratings:
      +4
      great review as always !! keep up the good work!!! :)

      The X7900 cost 5600 Euro in my country and the X5900 3600 E...... Is it worth the 2000 E more ?? Or will i get almost the same picture quality for less money ?

      Thanks!!


      P.S. The X7500 cost the same as X7900...... :S
       
    16. danny daniell

      danny daniell
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Jul 25, 2004
      Messages:
      1,635
      Products Owned:
      2
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      66
      Ratings:
      +148
      HDR aside and considering that the X7900 is faux 4K, is there much of an improvement in picture quality on 4K UHD discs over standard Blu Ray?

      And can anyone comment on the 3D and wether it has improved over the last couple of generations.

      I have an X500 and I am a big fan of 3D, eventually I would like to move up to 4K but not sure if it is worth the £xxxx outlay.

      Thanks, any input appreciated
       
    17. mambo1888

      mambo1888
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Dec 8, 2009
      Messages:
      3,697
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      136
      Location:
      Fife
      Ratings:
      +559
      Thats pretty much the exact same questions I was about to ask myself. I currently have an X70 which I still think is amazing but was wondering if its time for an upgrade.

      I dont quite get how these work. I know that the x70 only accepts 1080p and uses eshift to do a faux 4k image, but if these accept a 4k signal how does that work?

      One extra question id like to know the answer too is has the chassis changed from the x70 and would my current ceiling mount still work, its a cyberselect mount that was for x70/x75
       
    18. danny daniell

      danny daniell
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Jul 25, 2004
      Messages:
      1,635
      Products Owned:
      2
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      66
      Ratings:
      +148
      My guess would be that, no, there won’t be much difference. HDR and slightly better colours I would think .... the JVC’s are after all a 1080p design.
       
    19. mb3195

      mb3195
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Dec 27, 2007
      Messages:
      795
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      2
      Trophy Points:
      96
      Location:
      Deeping Gate, Peterborough
      Ratings:
      +623
      I can only comment on an Epson 9300. 4K discs are noticeably sharper than standard blu rays. Doing a direct comparison with Dunkirk and the difference was pretty obvious. More detail on things like clothing, skin, hair, etc.

      T2 was the biggest difference I have seen so far.
       
    20. mambo1888

      mambo1888
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Dec 8, 2009
      Messages:
      3,697
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      136
      Location:
      Fife
      Ratings:
      +559
      I think you may be right mate. I am still very happy with the X70, and Ive had it almost 6 years. I think I may hold off for a native 4k projector before making the upgrade. I doubt I would be able to wait another 6 years for the next upgrade if went for this and the next year or two they released a native 4k PJ.
       
    21. mambo1888

      mambo1888
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Dec 8, 2009
      Messages:
      3,697
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      136
      Location:
      Fife
      Ratings:
      +559
      Thats cool, so do these projectors take a 4k signal downscale the image to 1080p then use trickery to produce a faux 4k image. So by using a 4k source you are still getting gains compared to using a 1080p source.

      Im at the stage now where I am contemplating buying UHD Blu Rays as apposed to standard Blu Rays, but havent bought any yet as I only watch them on my PJ which wont accept a 4k source. I guess it might be time to start, even if for just future proofing.
       
    22. mb3195

      mb3195
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Dec 27, 2007
      Messages:
      795
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      2
      Trophy Points:
      96
      Location:
      Deeping Gate, Peterborough
      Ratings:
      +623
      Put it this way, I’m now starting to double dip on my collection, the dark knight trilogy in 4K has arrived today!!
       
    23. danny daniell

      danny daniell
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Jul 25, 2004
      Messages:
      1,635
      Products Owned:
      2
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      66
      Ratings:
      +148
      I think you can buy a gizmo called an HD fury that will allow your X70 to take a 4k input. Not sure if the X70 will be bright enough to take advantage of HDR and the wider colour gamut, that seems to be where the newer models like the X7900 really shine. Lol kudos to JVC for wringing every last drop out of 1080P!
       
    24. Toenail

      Toenail
      Member

      Joined:
      Sep 18, 2017
      Messages:
      23
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      3
      Location:
      New Zealand
      Ratings:
      +6
      Phil - have you checked the panel convergence compared to the X5900 or Sony? Is it better or worse?
       
    25. jfinnie

      jfinnie
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Oct 1, 2004
      Messages:
      3,461
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      133
      Location:
      Norwich
      Ratings:
      +1,147
      X70 cannot ever receive a 4K signal. It can only convert a 1080p signal to something 4kish internally and then display that on the screen in two alternating sets of diagonally overlapping pixels.

      The ability to receive 4K (albeit with only HDCP1.4) came in with the X500. For those displays an HDFury device can allow connection of modern HDCP2 signals. But you'll have to do something else with the HDR (either custom curves in the projector, or allow the player to convert).
       
    26. paulr2006

      paulr2006
      Distinguished Member

      Joined:
      Jun 30, 2007
      Messages:
      9,199
      Products Owned:
      1
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      166
      Location:
      Nottinghamshire
      Ratings:
      +2,315
      I had an Epson 9300w and yes a difference between BD and 4K but not massive, however the difference from BD to 4K on the JVC 5900 is much bigger, it can be jaw dropping. Despite what the AVF Review said HDR on the JVC is superior for sure.
       
      • Like Like x 3
      • Agree Agree x 2
      • List
      Last edited: Dec 25, 2017
    27. charles

      charles
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Jul 6, 2001
      Messages:
      1,337
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      63
      Location:
      norwich
      Ratings:
      +166
      An interesting review.Normal viewing distances -I view my 108" diagonal screen from 12 feet away with a Panasonic projector.At this distance would I see a difference with the Sony?
      Does the JVC use the same processing for upscaling other sources or is it only on 4K that it is used?
       
    28. mb3195

      mb3195
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Dec 27, 2007
      Messages:
      795
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      2
      Trophy Points:
      96
      Location:
      Deeping Gate, Peterborough
      Ratings:
      +623
      It can be used for any source about 480i.

      What do you mean will you see a difference with the Sony? Against your Panasonic or against the JVC?
       
    29. charles

      charles
      Active Member

      Joined:
      Jul 6, 2001
      Messages:
      1,337
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      0
      Trophy Points:
      63
      Location:
      norwich
      Ratings:
      +166
      Sorry my post was not clear.With the JVC compared to the Sony at the distance mentioned is it likely that I would see any difference between the Sony 4K projector and the JVC? Reviews mention that at normal viewing distances it is hard to tell but do not elaborate.
       
    30. mb3195

      mb3195
      Well-known Member

      Joined:
      Dec 27, 2007
      Messages:
      795
      Products Owned:
      0
      Products Wanted:
      2
      Trophy Points:
      96
      Location:
      Deeping Gate, Peterborough
      Ratings:
      +623
      I can’t comment as I’ve only read various reviews, but the general opinion is that it’s almost impossible to tell and it is only one part of what makes for a cinematic picture.

      The JVC is regarded as giving the best overall picture all things considered.
       

    Share This Page

    Loading...