Its quite common for people to critisicse the sentencing system in this country, crimes involving violence often result in a lesser sentence than those of a financial nature. When a serious crime occurs the public often demand harsh sentencing and are appauled when child killers walk free after short periods behind bars.
Reading this article it shows the other end of the spectrum. I cant even begin to comprehend the damage thats caused by locking up a child for life, and over there they mean life.
Granted if a person commits a crime then they should be punished, but is the death sentence or complete removal of freedom for life really the answer? Should we as a progressive nation be looking to develop better forms of punishment that don't upset the victims, don't cause a strain on the economy and give the individual a sense of hope for a better future?
Reading this article it shows the other end of the spectrum. I cant even begin to comprehend the damage thats caused by locking up a child for life, and over there they mean life.
Granted if a person commits a crime then they should be punished, but is the death sentence or complete removal of freedom for life really the answer? Should we as a progressive nation be looking to develop better forms of punishment that don't upset the victims, don't cause a strain on the economy and give the individual a sense of hope for a better future?