1. Join Now

    AVForums.com uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

JPG v RAW

Discussion in 'Photography Forums' started by seany, Apr 8, 2005.

  1. seany

    seany
    Banned

    Joined:
    May 1, 2003
    Messages:
    2,987
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    61
    Location:
    Manchester city
    Ratings:
    +1
  2. Johndm

    Johndm
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2003
    Messages:
    1,813
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    51
    Location:
    Bedford UK
    Ratings:
    +56
    5-10% better.....is it worth it.. :suicide:

    Had a little dabble with RAW, and for the moment, I have made the decision to stick with large/fine jpeg.

    Why you may ask....or may not.. :rotfl:
    Where I was struggling to get good quality from my 75-300 at times, now I have the 'L' beastie, quality is just soooo much better.

    After an airshow, I just ain't got time to process 400-500 RAW files.. :eek:
    And I have other hobbys to persue..

    Now maybe if I went Pro.....gave up the day job....
     
  3. mr jones

    mr jones
    Standard Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,041
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    41
    Location:
    (S)cumbria, UK
    Ratings:
    +22
    i shoot raw, it just allows me to further play with the image

    the whitebalance is a good tool for me, able to control the colours alot finer than in photoshop
     
  4. S2K DG

    S2K DG
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2004
    Messages:
    259
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    21
    Ratings:
    +18
    Mr Jones, what software do you use to adjust the raw files?
     
  5. mr jones

    mr jones
    Standard Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,041
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    41
    Location:
    (S)cumbria, UK
    Ratings:
    +22
    ive tried a number of differnt progs

    started with digital photo professional that ships with the 20D, its ok, but didnt really like it
    then used PS CS plugin for raw, didnt like that either


    ive been using rawshooter essentials 2005 for about a week now and find it alot better than the others.

    still open to others though :)
     
  6. seany

    seany
    Banned

    Joined:
    May 1, 2003
    Messages:
    2,987
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    61
    Location:
    Manchester city
    Ratings:
    +1
    Still 90 to 95% shots are just as good (but then thats one opinion), does make you wonder if for most shots (for guys like us at least) is all that's needed
     
  7. mattym

    mattym
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2003
    Messages:
    2,116
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Location:
    maidstone
    Ratings:
    +101
    i think for amatuers hi-q jpegs are fine, but for the pros the flexibility of raw must be better? Also, raw is quiet cool if your not anygood at exposure like me and keep getting it wrong, it can help loads!
     
  8. martynk

    martynk
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    Just a thought. Maybe it's the other way round. Pros generally get the jpegs right, and don't have time for extensive editing, but amateurs got another shot at it?
     
  9. mattym

    mattym
    Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2003
    Messages:
    2,116
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Location:
    maidstone
    Ratings:
    +101
    possible i suppose, some cameras like the 20d give a high quality Jpeg as well as the raw, allowing the photographer to see instant results and still fiddle with the digital 'negative'
     
  10. HotblackDesiato

    HotblackDesiato
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2002
    Messages:
    1,170
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    USA
    Ratings:
    +230
    I use RAW i guess because i've found it to be a "get out of jail free card" in terms of its subsequent flexibility. Manipulations in RAW cause less degradation than those in PS. I use CameraRAW to screen out the keepers then batch process those shots i want to take to CS . The odd picture i really like i'll work on extensively in RAW before shipping to CS. I only really use CS to work on shadows and sharpen.
    My only real worry is the long term support for the ever changing raw files... jpg i suspect will be around in one form or another in 20 years...CR2 i'm not so sure.
     
  11. mr jones

    mr jones
    Standard Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,041
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    41
    Location:
    (S)cumbria, UK
    Ratings:
    +22
    Jpegs automatically output at 72DPi whereas raw files can be converted to higher DPi's without any fuss whcih can only be good for printing
     
  12. tomson

    tomson
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2000
    Messages:
    1,918
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Location:
    Berk'amsted
    Ratings:
    +187
    Raw can be handy if you have a difficult shot like a person back lit by a bright window in quite a dark room. You can process the image twice: one where you expose for the person and one where you expose for the window or other bright spots in the picture. Then, you merge the two together. Doing it from the raw file allows you to adjust things without too much degradation - something that isn't possible from a jpeg. Of course you could take a sequence of bracketed shots but thats not always convenient.

    But image quality wise the difference between jpeg and raw is getting less and less as in-camera jpeg engines get better and better.
     
  13. ASH1

    ASH1
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2003
    Messages:
    1,208
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    51
    Ratings:
    +61
    I mostly shot in raw, as tyefi said it's a get out of jail free card. It's like having a second chance at the shot. I then send them to PS for levels/curves ect, and then save them as tiffs as they leave you with a better quality image then a jpeg.

    ASH1
     
  14. Pink Fairy

    Pink Fairy
    Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    Messages:
    236
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Location:
    Watford
    Ratings:
    +11
    Personally, with my own type of photography (birds), life is just too short to use RAW... and I know a lot of pro's in my own field think the same. Speed of use and getting far more shots on the card vs the difference between a well exposed jpg and a RAW file just isn't worth it.
    I can certainly see the benefits of RAW for many photographers though.

    Andy
     
  15. Johndm

    Johndm
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2003
    Messages:
    1,813
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    51
    Location:
    Bedford UK
    Ratings:
    +56
    Thats me too. :smashin:

    If the shot is a good one, no need to faff around with RAW
     
  16. HotblackDesiato

    HotblackDesiato
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2002
    Messages:
    1,170
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    USA
    Ratings:
    +230
    That's one of the main uses i have for RAW...forget more MP and a full size sensor the day they come up with something with more than 5 or 6 stops of dynamic range i'll be buying it! Like i say i find postprocessing in RAW then 16bit Tiff to CS seems to offer improvements over starting with Jpeg.
    The point about file size is well taken though just had to buy two new 200Gb drives to cope with the load.
     
  17. ASH1

    ASH1
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2003
    Messages:
    1,208
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    51
    Ratings:
    +61
    But if it's not then your stuffed. At least with raw you may be able to rescue it.

    ASH1
     
  18. Pink Fairy

    Pink Fairy
    Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    Messages:
    236
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    31
    Location:
    Watford
    Ratings:
    +11
    The latitude for recovering a poor jpg shot is still huge, hardly 'stuffed'.
     
  19. HotblackDesiato

    HotblackDesiato
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2002
    Messages:
    1,170
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    USA
    Ratings:
    +230
    Recovery of highlights in RAW is way ahead of anything i've been able to pull off from jpg. At the other end of the scale working with shadows in RAW linear gamma is a pretty blunt tool compared to what you can do in tiff or jpg.

    Each has pros/cons..."right" or "better" comes down to personal preference.
     

Share This Page

Loading...