Dismiss Notice
Attention AVForums app / Tapatalk users
Sadly GDPR means that, from 25th, we can no longer offer access to AVForums via the branded app or Tapatalk.
Click here for more information.

JFK docu on bbc 2 in 5 mins

Discussion in 'TV Show Forum' started by MrFurious, Nov 23, 2003.

  1. MrFurious

    MrFurious
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2000
    Messages:
    14,961
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    137
    Location:
    Cardigan Wales
    Ratings:
    +1,885
    as in the header,should be an interesting one.:smashin:
     
  2. Garrett

    Garrett
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2001
    Messages:
    40,221
    Products Owned:
    2
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    167
    Location:
    The best thief you’ll never see.
    Ratings:
    +6,658
    I was reading the ruled out the theory of suicide, no jokeing.
     
  3. MrFurious

    MrFurious
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2000
    Messages:
    14,961
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    137
    Location:
    Cardigan Wales
    Ratings:
    +1,885
    great programme,they did,nt like Oliver stone's JFK though did they.
     
  4. bowenjones

    bowenjones
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,800
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    106
    Location:
    Wales
    Ratings:
    +441
    JFK (the film) has always been one of my favourites but, after
    watching this excellent documentary, I don't think that I'll ever
    be able to enjoy it again! I loved Oliver Stones interpretation of the many conspiracy theories that have surfaced since the assasination of Kennedy, but this programme made him look like a fiction writer!
     
  5. Rambo John J

    Rambo John J
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2000
    Messages:
    4,617
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Location:
    Hanoi Hilton
    Ratings:
    +1,740
    I'm not sure what to make of it. I don't know whether I should take something as "gospel" just because it was in a documentary (albeit a very interesting one) from the BBC. After all, I've seen how a journo like Martin Bashir can stitch someone up the way he did with Michael Jackson... all these theories are the same, it all depends on just how much you say and how much you don't. I didn't see anything that would make me bet my mortgage on the BBCs theory any more than I would Oliver Stones.

    I remain baffled :confused: :D
     
  6. Gary D

    Gary D
    Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2002
    Messages:
    7,786
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Ratings:
    +838
    JFk (the movie) is one of my all time favs (editing, sound, direction etc) its a mesmerising peice of film making. But i always knew it was partly fiction (as my father is a JFK nut - books videos etc). However, what it did do was highlight that there are/were (?) a lot of unanswered questions surrounding the shooting of JFK. I watched the documentary last night and felt a little short changed - things were glossed over (i.e how did Oswald get back into the USA (with a russian wife) AFTER he had defected to the USSR? esp at the high of the cold war?) and the final shot (the back and too the left one" was not really discussed in any great detail.

    If it was Oswald then so be it - but also remember that Clay Shaw WAS a CIA agent at the time of the shooting.

    Those of you who have seen the film - have you ever wondered who the Mr X character was really? well it was this man:

    http://www.prouty.org/


    Gary
     
  7. o THE CHAD o

    o THE CHAD o
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    1,480
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    51
    Location:
    London
    Ratings:
    +83
    did anyone tape this?

    i forgot it was it was on,ill pay you some £££s for you to jiffy it to me.
     
  8. Garrett

    Garrett
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2001
    Messages:
    40,221
    Products Owned:
    2
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    167
    Location:
    The best thief you’ll never see.
    Ratings:
    +6,658
    I saw Alex Cox do an intro to The Parallax View some years ago, I had seen the film previously and it had chilled me to the bone, but Alex’s intro really frightened me, as he presented some facts about shadow conspiracies and organisations.:rolleyes:

    At first watching last nights documentary I started believing it was a Lone Gunman but thinking back to the Alex’s intro I believe anything could have happened.
     
  9. FoxyMulder

    FoxyMulder
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    I'm just waiting for my copy of JFK directors cut to arrive i love that film and Donald Sutherland deserved an oscar for best supporting actor.
     
  10. Mr THX

    Mr THX
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,309
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    51
    Location:
    Barnsley
    Ratings:
    +32
    Have to say I really enjoyed JKF on the big screen, thought it was one of Costner's more defining moments. After watching the documentary last night though I was quite disturbed at how artistic license Oliver Stone used when making the film - had I know on the films cinema release that it was not really a docu-film but more a representation of how Stone believed the assassination had happened, I would have viewed it in a very different way. As muted it the Doc' last night, Stone’s portrayal of the assassination had so much weight that the ever so intelligent America public (or many of them) now believe Stone's version of the events.
    The bit that really disturbs me are speeches which never happened, like Jim Garrison final summing up in the court room, a speech that was never made in real life but one mustered up by Stone - for what reason? To tell it how he wanted? To make it more exciting? To give it more drama?
     
  11. FoxyMulder

    FoxyMulder
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    I thought that was a speech too far cos they had already made their point before that scene, but still it did make some interesting points and raised some questions.
     
  12. Gary D

    Gary D
    Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2002
    Messages:
    7,786
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    136
    Ratings:
    +838
    the courtroom scene in JFk was written on the fly, stone was writing it then directing Costner.


    Gary
     
  13. Nobber22

    Nobber22
    Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2002
    Messages:
    2,982
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    86
    Location:
    Berkshire
    Ratings:
    +111
    I think Oswald did it - alone. The whole point of the documentary was to try to get people to realise that one nut can do such a monstrous thing on his own. Oswald's brother carefully explained how disturbed he was and that he did it for the attention.

    Jack Ruby also shot Oswald thinking he'd be regarded as a hero. Just small men wanting to feel bigger. No orders, no conspiracy.

    Stone's portrayel of the events now look like a fairytale. :rolleyes: Magic bullet, Pristine bullet, grassy knoll, 6 secs for all 3 shots impossible, etc. :boring:
     
  14. kilvil

    kilvil
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2003
    Messages:
    353
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Ratings:
    +191
    not the first time olly stone has blured fact from fiction. as a doors fan 50% of the film "the doors" is fiction, myth is mixed with fact to make a more interesting story,. likewise in jfk. remember films are entertainment not historical documents has been so for a hundred years,
    eg

    birth of a nation
    olympiad
    bridge on river kwai
    black hawk down

    all based on facts but not in shooting distance of the truth.

    ps. loved all six films listed above

    kilvil
     
  15. Stuart Wright

    Stuart Wright
    AVForums Founder Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2000
    Messages:
    14,545
    Products Owned:
    7
    Products Wanted:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    167
    Location:
    Birmingham, UK
    Ratings:
    +10,367
    I was very upset by the documentary.
    I'm interested in the JFK assasination and watched 'The Men Who Killed Kenedy' which raised a lot of questions which the documentary last night could never have time to address.
    But I had taken the 'facts' used in JFK to be just that - FACTS.
    No - I couldn't believe that Oswald could fire off 3 rounds in 6 seconds. YES I could believe that he could do it in 8.3.
    In JFK they said Oswald was an average shot. Wrong - he was an outstanding shot at 200 yards. And the repository window to the motorcade was 88 yards.
    JFK would have us believe that the 'pristine' 'magic' bullet was 'placed' on the stretch in the hospital. The fact that it was in no way pristine and was a 97% match for the shards in the Govenor's wrist added to the effect.
    And the computer reconstruction which illustrates that the 'magic' bullet theory would only be 'needed' with Kennedy and the Govenor sat in the wrong places in any theoretical model. Place them in the correct sitting positions and the single bullet explains their wounds perfectly.
    And when I discovered that Jim Garrison never made that incredibly moving speech which Costner made at the end of JFK, I was livid.
    I feel Oliver Stone has duped me and I'll never watch JFK again as for me it's completely invalidated.

    You wouldn't believe the number of people who contact me accusing me of some wild conspiracy theory as to why their post has been deleted where, of course, no such conspiracy exists.
    My take on life is that the simplest explanation is probably the correct one. No there are no aliens. No there isn't a God. And after seeing the documentary last night, no, there was probably no conspiracy.
     
  16. FoxyMulder

    FoxyMulder
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    Why was my post deleted lol
     
  17. Stuart Wright

    Stuart Wright
    AVForums Founder Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2000
    Messages:
    14,545
    Products Owned:
    7
    Products Wanted:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    167
    Location:
    Birmingham, UK
    Ratings:
    +10,367
    I can't comment on Birth... or Olympiad and I know Bridge... was a story so far from the truth that the people who actually suffered at the hands of the Japs were upset by it (excellent though the film was). But BHD was made to be as close to the truth as possible while maintaining an entertaining story within 2 hours. IMO it was within spitting distance of the truth.
     
  18. bh

    bh
    Standard Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2000
    Messages:
    397
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    21
    Location:
    Lost (no GPS here)!
    Ratings:
    +1
  19. FoxyMulder

    FoxyMulder
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    sheeeeesh i got JFK coming this week on DVD and now readin all those pages have spoiled it for me, Stones made a work of fiction tskkk.
     
  20. Garrett

    Garrett
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2001
    Messages:
    40,221
    Products Owned:
    2
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    167
    Location:
    The best thief you’ll never see.
    Ratings:
    +6,658
    Just enjoy it as a piece of fiction like I do with Braveheart.:D

    There is an other JFK documentary tonight on BBC2 called Days That Shook The World.
     
  21. Kevo

    Kevo
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2001
    Messages:
    5,397
    Products Owned:
    1
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    86
    Location:
    Manchester
    Ratings:
    +149
    I was planning on watching the JFK DVD this week with my GF (I've seen it before, she hasn't).

    Before the BBC2 doc I explained to her how great it was and how they prove there 'probably' was a conspiracy involving many different characters and complex sub-plots etc.

    But now after seeing the doc, i've had to retract all this and we WON'T be watching it.

    I feel such a fool for believing it. I know it's only a film but Stone is such a skilled film maker, he sucks you in and you can't help but take it all as fact. :blush:

    Even before the film was made I believed there was a conspiracy.
    Back in the 80s Central TV made a convincing doc based on the book 'Crossfire' which nailed it for me.

    But this is the first doc that I have seen on JFK that solely looks at the facts and the lone nut guman theory rather than any conspiracy theory.

    Like Spectre says....

    The simplest (and most obvious) explainationation is usually the correct one.

    Let's hear it for modern documentary film makers who in recent years have debunked the Monroe conspiracy theory, Psychics (cold reading), Ghosts, UFOs etc and most other paranormal nonsense.
     
  22. FoxyMulder

    FoxyMulder
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    Hey Braveheart isn't fiction that man's a hero in Scotland with his own statue.

    Ghosts and other apparitions which we see are the result of low ultra sonic frequencies which distort human thinking and cause hallucinations.

    Tssssssk :)
     
  23. Garrett

    Garrett
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2001
    Messages:
    40,221
    Products Owned:
    2
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    167
    Location:
    The best thief you’ll never see.
    Ratings:
    +6,658
    Not saying WW wasn’t real, he was real like JFK but there was a lot of fiction thrown in Braveheart which a many of the punters took as being actual fact or liked to be fact.
     
  24. seany

    seany
    Banned

    Joined:
    May 1, 2003
    Messages:
    2,997
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    61
    Location:
    Manchester city
    Ratings:
    +1
    For starters, it was Sir william wallace. not the farmer type gibson had you believe
     
  25. DVDcake

    DVDcake
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    471
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    21
    Location:
    Invading Surrey UK
    Ratings:
    +3
    'Infrasound', as used in the Japanese movie 'Ring'...

    I Hope...:rolleyes:
     
  26. HMHB

    HMHB
    Distinguished Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2001
    Messages:
    26,715
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Location:
    Nottinghamshire
    Ratings:
    +5,477
    It's no wonder Americans believe the won the 2nd World War single handed, people seem to believe Hollywood rather than the history books. No doubt soon they will all believe that one American single handedly saved the UK from German invasion during the Battle Of Britain
    ;)
     
  27. DVDcake

    DVDcake
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2002
    Messages:
    471
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    21
    Location:
    Invading Surrey UK
    Ratings:
    +3
    That would have been the Rocketeer.:)
     
  28. seany

    seany
    Banned

    Joined:
    May 1, 2003
    Messages:
    2,997
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    61
    Location:
    Manchester city
    Ratings:
    +1
    The devils own made me want to throw up. The way they made brad pitt out to be a hero. Harrison ford saying to mr pitt as he kicking it. "You had no choice"!!!

    Just show'd how little they know about terrorism, and northern Ireland
     
  29. Spazwunkle

    Spazwunkle
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    I love the film but haven't seen it for a while, and I watched about 10 minutes of the documentary, so I can't say whether this stuff was covered or not. Maybe someone can help me out.

    But wasn't there a guy hit with a ricochet under the over pass, that I think Stones' film said proved there was more then one gunman? Was this covered in the documentary?

    There was all those witnesses who said they heard gunfire from the grassy knoll. Before all the conspiracy stuff started circulating. And although they mentioned in the documentary, that a body can move in any direction after being shot, it still seems a bit iffy that his head would move "back and to the left", after being shot in the back of the head.

    I did like the dispelling of the magic bullet theory in the doc which kind of quells that theory for me. but that part is all I really got to see.

    There was the thing about the the Oswald photo, and how it seemed to be a forgery.

    Like has been mentioned, there was the thing about Oswald being let back into the country after defecting. Shaw being CIA. The notes from Oswalds interogation being destroyed etc. The way there was no police presence on the street or covering the windows. The president driving in an open top car, with it being cleaned and repaired straight after the shooting without being looked at. etc.

    Theres tons of stuff, but these are just things I can remember off the top of my head.

    How much of Stone theories were covered in the documentary?

    I'm not or never will believe Stones film is the truth or that there was a conspiracy, or whether it was only one person. For the simple reason that one film and one documentary won't guide my stance either way. Its not enough, and should not be for anyone who is saying that 'the other guy' is talking total bullsh*t after watching the one documentary or one film.

    For people who are now shocked and appalled at Stones film and the fact that that Garrison never made the speech. Its a film and films have always taken liberties. If you are watching either a film or a documentary, and taking it as gospel truth, I think you may need to step back a bit and realise that every arguement has two sides (or in the case of JFK many sides :))

    From what I saw of the doc, and Stones film, both of them refused or just disregarded any information that would upset their theories. Which will always cause a problem in assuming 'the truth'.

    The only persons opinion I would believe at this point is Garyd's dad :) who is a "JFK nut" and has done a load of research on the subject. What does he think actually happened?
     
  30. Kevo

    Kevo
    Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2001
    Messages:
    5,397
    Products Owned:
    1
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    86
    Location:
    Manchester
    Ratings:
    +149
    Watch ALL the documentary, it deals with the FACTS unlike the film which deals with THEORIES and a LOT of fiction.
    It will change your view.

    Have a look at this site....

    http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm

    It explains all (and much more) of what the doc covered, i.e THE FACTS.

    Other than in films, have you ever seen anybody shot in the back of the head and seen what happens? I certainly haven't.

    Do you have any medical, pathological or ballistics expertise to back your 'iffy' statement?

    I know I haven't, but on the link above there is a clip demontrating somebody shooting a melon from behind with a rifle and lo and behold it rolls backwards.

    Quite a lot and they were all POO POO'D.

    e.g. Oswald was a crack marksman and he had 8.5 seconds not 6 seconds to fire 3 shots. Even an 89 year old man being interviewed could do it!

    Not in this case. One deals with the facts, the others deal with theories, hearsay, speculation and even a much fiction (which helps sells books and a film!).
    You wouldn't make a good juror.

    Stone's film was a good piece of cinema and that' all it was nothing more.

    JFK was assasinated by a lone gun man nut.
    Why is this so hard to believe?
    Reagan and Lennon were shot by similar nuts.

    There was no conspiracy.
    It just seems incomprehendable that a frail looking misfit could be capable of killing the world's most powerful man at the time.

    It happened.
     

Share This Page

Loading...
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice