Dismiss Notice
Attention AVForums app / Tapatalk users
Sadly GDPR means that, from 25th, we can no longer offer access to AVForums via the branded app or Tapatalk.
Click here for more information.

Its a Jukebox not an Mp3 Player!!!!!!!!

Discussion in 'Headphones, Earphones & Portable Music' started by jason5_k, Oct 26, 2005.

  1. jason5_k

    jason5_k
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    Hi, isn't the mp3 format old and rubbish compared to others???
    Since 128kb/s mp3 is the same as 64kb/s wma and 64kb/s Atrac3plus is the same quality as 128kb/s wma etc etc etc Why do people use mp3s when there are better alternatives for less size??????

    P.S I refuse to call my music thingy an mp3 player cos there are no mp3s on it, I call it a Jukebox.
     
  2. mick's cat

    mick's cat
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    That's why most people call them digital audio players (DAPs) actually.
     
  3. doctorjuggles

    doctorjuggles
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2004
    Messages:
    799
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    21
    Location:
    London
    Ratings:
    +19
    mp3s are ubiquitous and, ripped correctly using VBR/LAME/EAC, offer an excellent level of reproduction.

    What you have to remember is that while all companies seem hell-bent on pushing their own proprietary formats regardless of what the users want, mp3 capability remains pretty much constant on all of them, and therefore is the format of choice. Looking at your posting history and your problems with your current player being unable to play wma, you should be able to appreciate the convenience of having everything in one format that will play on almost any player you choose.

    I'd also be very, very wary of claims that 128kbps of format X is only as good as 64kbps of format Y when it's normally a specific company making those claims. They usually have their own agenda.

    Head over to HydrogenAudio's forums for a fair, balanced and scientific take on the issue.

    And technically, a jukebox is a big thing with records in. You may be referring to a digital jukebox, but again, the definiton is hazy on that. The more popular name, as has been eloquently pointed out, is a DAP
     
  4. jason5_k

    jason5_k
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    Okay thanks, this whole digital audio is quite confusing, and I thought I knew it all.
     
  5. jason5_k

    jason5_k
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    I obviously don't!!
     
  6. doctorjuggles

    doctorjuggles
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2004
    Messages:
    799
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    21
    Location:
    London
    Ratings:
    +19
    Heh. Only one way to learn, which you're doing. There's plenty of knowledge on these forums if you ask. :thumbsup:
     
  7. lukey

    lukey
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    remember aswell that mp3 is supported by virtually all types of players and thats one of its advantages, the problems with formats such as aac or atrac is that they are specific to a particular player so if your ipod or sony hd goes arse up then you either have to replace it with another or re rip your entire collection again.

    Mp3 whilst being an old format still provides excellent quality, i rip in 320 kbs vbr which for me gives near cd quality, admitidly it takes up more space but thats only an issue if your intending to rip 10000 tracks onto a 20 gb drive.

    Quality, as one poster has already said, is a subjective word. Some people cannot notice the difference between and mp3 in 128 or 320kbs or between an mp3 and an atrac or aac file. I have downloaded from itunes whose aac compression rate is much poorer in quality that what im used to in mp3 so its not that easy trying to compare like with like
     
  8. DiGdUb

    DiGdUb
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    i rip my songs in mp3 format even though my player plays ogg. i learnt a painful lesson previously when i switched from an ogg-capable player to one that does not support ogg and had to re-rip half of my collection back to mp3. stick with the widely used mp3 format unless you have golden ears.
     
  9. lukey

    lukey
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    yep...same thing happened to me when i ripped 200 cds into atrac then my sony hd went bust, didnt want another sony so had to re-rip to mp3, wont be caught out again thats why i will always use mp3 in future.!!!
     
  10. Sasso

    Sasso
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    Some formats are preferred not only because they have better compression but they allow gapless playback, eg, sony's atrac
     
  11. lukey

    lukey
    Guest

    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0
    yep thats right...its all comes down to what your priorities are when choosing a dap
     
  12. SuperSaiyan4

    SuperSaiyan4
    Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2005
    Messages:
    2,245
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +49
    On the subject of formats whats the highest quality to use on say iTunes with a Nano? As in bitrate? I cant tell much difference from 256k and 320k bit rates at which bit rate is their noticeable difference in audio? i.e. 64k to 256k?
     
  13. doctorjuggles

    doctorjuggles
    Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2004
    Messages:
    799
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    21
    Location:
    London
    Ratings:
    +19
    That's a question only you can answer, because everyone has different hearing. So rip a song you know well at various different bitrates and listen to it at all those bitrates. However low you can go without noticing a difference, that's the one you should choose.
     
  14. Steven

    Steven
    Senior Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2005
    Messages:
    37,222
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    166
    Ratings:
    +6,428
    Hell just buy a 60/80gb DAP and have your music lossless :D
     
  15. drmoze

    drmoze
    Standard Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2005
    Messages:
    196
    Products Owned:
    0
    Products Wanted:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Ratings:
    +1
    A 60-80 gb DAP wouldn't come close to holding my music in a lossless format. I have close to (or maybe a bit more than) 1000 albums. Can't even quite fit them onto my 20gb HD5 at 64kbps, so they wouldn't even fit on an 80gb unit at 256 lossy format.

    (And yes, I *like* being able to pick out whatever I may be in the mood to listen to at any time, and not have to go back to my pc to transfer stuff. ;) )
     

Share This Page

Loading...
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice